🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,577 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
7 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030(f)(2)(i)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

ALJ

Denaka Partners, LP, dba Home Rubber Company

Machine-guarding and bloodborne-pathogen violations affirmed

Denaka manufactured rubber products at a New Jersey facility where an employee's sleeve became caught in an operating slitter mill, pulling his arm into the machine and resulting in an amputation. OSHA cited the company for inadequate machine guarding and for failures involving hepatitis B…

June 21, 2023 ·Sharon D. Calhoun
Modified
COMM

Home Rubber Company, LP

Audiogram violations reduced to serious and shaft-coupling item vacated

Home Rubber manufactured specialty industrial rubber products at a New Jersey facility where an employee's hand was pulled into a mill, resulting in the surgical amputation of four fingers. OSHA's inspection produced citations covering numerous safety and health requirements. On review, the…

August 26, 2021
Mixed result
ALJ

Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, d/b/a Walmart Distribution Center #7035

Hepatitis B vaccination violations affirmed

Walmart operated a volunteer Serious Injury Response Team at a Florida distribution center to provide first aid until emergency medical personnel arrived. Because team members could contact blood while treating injured employees, the judge found that they had occupational exposure to bloodborne…

May 30, 2017 ·Heather A. Joys
Modified
COMM

Loretto-Oswego Residential Health Care Facility

Repeat violations reduced to serious

Loretto-Oswego operated a nursing home affiliated with two other Loretto facilities that had prior final orders for substantially similar violations. The judge treated the related corporations as a single employer and affirmed seven items as repeat. The Commission reversed because the facilities…

January 7, 2011
Modified
COMM

The Barbosa Group, Inc. d/b/a Executive Security

Bloodborne-pathogen items affirmed with reduced penalty

Barbosa supplied security personnel to a federal immigration detention facility where their duties exposed them to blood and other bodily fluids. The Commission held that Barbosa remained their employer because it hired, paid, scheduled, supervised, and disciplined them, even though the federal…

February 5, 2007
Modified
COMM

Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc.

Temporary-worker violations affirmed as non-willful

Froedtert used temporary-agency housekeepers who were exposed to bloodborne-pathogen and chemical hazards at the hospital. The Commission held that Froedtert was their common-law employer because it controlled their assignments, daily activities, tools, work location, and performance, even though…

January 15, 2004
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Thoroughgood, Inc., d/b/a Azalea Court

Most bloodborne pathogen and vermin citations affirmed at a personal care home

Thoroughgood, Inc., doing business as Azalea Court, runs a residential personal care home in downtown Philadelphia that housed about 70 to 80 residents. After a September 1996 inspection, OSHA cited the home for failing to control rodents and insects and for ten separate violations of the…

April 5, 1999 ·Nancy J. Spies
Mixed result

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.