🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242

Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,577 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
7 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030(c)(1)(i)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

ALJ

Brower Dental Health, P.C.

Exposure-control-plan violation affirmed with reduced penalty

Brower Dental Health operated dental offices where employees encountered blood and other potentially infectious material in their daily work. During OSHA's inspection, employees could not locate or identify the required written exposure control plan, and the owner did not produce one until about…

January 26, 2017 ·Patrick B. Augustine
Modified
ALJ

American Recycling & Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Broad safety violations affirmed after amputation inspection

American Recycling & Manufacturing produced wood packaging materials and pallets at a Rochester, New York facility. OSHA opened a safety inspection after a twenty-year-old employee's left hand was amputated when a coworker accidentally activated a pop-up saw, then opened a related health inspection…

October 15, 2015 ·Dennis L. Phillips
Mixed result
ALJ

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc.

Press-cleaning violations affirmed and pathogen items vacated

An employee lost a finger while cleaning a running can-end press near the unguarded rear of a pulley. The judge found it reasonably predictable that employees would clean beyond the machine's front because they had done so regularly and were never clearly prohibited from cleaning the rear. Crown…

March 28, 2011 ·G. Marvin Bober
Mixed result
ALJ

Thoroughgood, Inc., d/b/a Azalea Court

Most bloodborne pathogen and vermin citations affirmed at a personal care home

Thoroughgood, Inc., doing business as Azalea Court, runs a residential personal care home in downtown Philadelphia that housed about 70 to 80 residents. After a September 1996 inspection, OSHA cited the home for failing to control rodents and insects and for ten separate violations of the…

April 5, 1999 ·Nancy J. Spies
Mixed result
COMM

Tidewater Pacific, Inc.

OSHA jurisdiction upheld on uninspected tugboat

OSHA cited working conditions on an uninspected tugboat operating within Alaska's three-mile territorial waters. The Commission held that a vessel in those waters is a workplace in a state under the OSH Act. Coast Guard regulation did not preempt OSHA's confined-space, machine-guarding…

March 24, 1997
Modified
ALJ

Central Operating Co.-Philip Sporn

First-aid crew bloodborne-pathogen items affirmed as nonserious

Central Operating Company designated 82 employees at its Philip Sporn plant as members of a first-aid crew. The company argued that rendering aid was voluntary, so the crew members were good samaritans rather than employees with occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens. The judge rejected that…

March 15, 1995 ·Michael H. Schoenfeld
Modified
COMM

EBAA Iron, Inc.

Silica overexposure and control citations vacated

EBAA Iron operated a foundry in Cordele, Georgia, where OSHA sampled the breathing zone of an inner-diameter grinder operator and calculated exposure above the limit for respirable crystalline silica. EBAA showed that the grinding wheel contained 40 percent zirconium oxide and that OSHA's own…

February 7, 1995
Citations vacated

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.