Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.
Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.
No decisions match these filters
Try a different search term or clear the filters.
Allied Equipment Company
Numerous shop violations affirmed with a one-cent total penalty
Allied Equipment manufactured horse and stock trailers and repaired truck bodies and frames with five employees. The judge affirmed numerous nonserious violations involving flammable-liquid storage, fire extinguishers, machine and power-transmission guarding, grinder adjustments, a portable saw…
"AH" Metal Fabricators, Inc.
Ironworker point-of-operation citation affirmed with a $300 penalty
"AH" Metal Fabricators performed custom metal fabrication using a Mubea Ironworker with notching and hole-punching stations. Operators manually positioned metal close to the unguarded points of operation, creating a risk of finger or hand amputation. The judge rejected the employer's impossibility…
Central Meat Company
Exit, machine-guarding, and electrical violations affirmed
Central Meat Company operated a small meat-processing plant where an inspection found a slippery floor, locked rear doors, inadequately guarded bandsaws, and several electrical hazards. The judge vacated the housekeeping item because the company devoted substantial effort to continuous cleaning and…
Mikel Company, Inc.
Machine-guarding items affirmed in part and penalties reduced
Mikel Company manufactured high-style furniture using saws, routers, a jointer, and a root shaper. The judge vacated the root-shaper item because the evidence showed a hold-down guard was installed, but affirmed jointer and router guarding violations with penalties of $30 and $35. Four saw-guarding…
Hedges Neon Sales, Inc.
Steelworker guarding violation affirmed with reduced penalty
Hedges Neon Sales used a multipurpose steelworker with flat shears, a V-notcher, and a punch. OSHA originally cited a mechanical-power-press rule, then amended the charge without objection to the general point-of-operation guarding standard. The machine had movable guards, but operators could…
Kennedy Houseboats, Inc.
Machine-guarding citation affirmed without penalties
Kennedy Houseboats contested point-of-operation guarding allegations involving double-angle saws, a Pexto shear, and the shear and punch on a Dvorak Iron Worker, while several other electrical and machine-guarding items remained contested only as to penalty. The judge found that employees’ hands…
Huron Culvert and Tank Company
Rivet-punch and shear guarding violations affirmed
Two Stamco rivet-and-punch machines required a helper to place a hand beneath the punch and rivet hammer at least once during each culvert assembly, and no guarding device was present. The judge found that interlocking dual controls could be installed and that possible production slowdown or…
Schultz Roof Truss, Inc.
Judge's decision affirmed without substantive review
The Commission affirmed the judge's decision because no party objected and the review order identified no compelling public-interest issue. Commissioner Moran agreed with affirming settled nonserious items but said he would vacate two litigated serious citations under the woodworking-machinery…
Western Steel Manufacturing Company
Squaring-shear guarding violation affirmed
Western Steel used an unguarded Niagara squaring shear to cut metal. The Commission held that the machine was not a mechanical power press because its moving element was a blade rather than a slide fitted with tools or dies. The general machine-guarding standard therefore applied, and the evidence…
Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. and Blount Brothers Corporation, a Joint Venture
Superdome citations affirmed
The joint venture was general contractor for construction of the Louisiana Superdome, with about 350 employees and numerous subcontractors at the site. The Commission affirmed two serious citations and eighteen additional items covering perimeter and opening guards, personal protective equipment…
Long Manufacturing Company, N.C., Inc.
Press-brake penalty affirmed, punch-press item vacated
Long manufactured farm equipment and had been ordered to guard the operating points of two press brakes. It installed paired palm buttons, but the buttons were close enough to operate with one hand and could also be bypassed with plug-in devices. Supervisors knew that employees sometimes defeated…
Slyter Chair, Inc.
Two machine-guarding violations affirmed
Slyter Chair manufactured wood and upholstered furniture at a plant in Tacoma, Washington. OSHA cited the company because sewing-machine needles and wood-shaper cutting heads were not adequately guarded, and because a drum of lacquer thinner was kept near spray-finishing operations. The Commission…
Advance Specialty Company, Inc.
Cyanide-gas and guarding violations affirmed
Advance Specialty fabricated wire parts at a worksite shared with Platers and Coaters, an affiliated plating operation under common ownership and management. An employee of each company died when an inexperienced worker mixed acid salts with sodium cyanide and produced hydrogen cyanide gas. The…
Apex Glass & Sash, Inc., d/b/a Acme Glass Company
Radial-saw guarding violation affirmed
Acme Glass used a 12-inch radial arm saw to cut aluminum window-framing tubing. The upper half of the blade was covered, but up to six inches of the lower blade remained exposed while operators stood in front of the blade and held tubing about six inches away. The Commission held that the normal…
K & T Steel Corporation
Machine-guarding citation affirmed for three unguarded machines
K & T Steel fabricated structural steel, reinforcing bar, and tanks. OSHA cited the company because an ironworker, hydraulic press brake, and plate rolling machine lacked point-of-operation guards. K & T admitted the ironworker violation but contested the other two machines. The Commission held…
Gate City Steel Corporation
Press-brake guarding case remanded for a merits hearing
Gate City Steel operated a metal-fabrication shop in Boise, Idaho. OSHA issued a serious citation alleging that two press brakes lacked point-of-operation guards and proposed a $600 penalty. Before taking evidence, the judge held that the general machine-guarding standard did not apply to press…
Acme Metal, Inc.
Penalty-only contests leave citations final
Acme Metal operated two steel-fabricating plants in Portland, Oregon. OSHA cited machine-guarding and posting violations after inspecting both plants. The Commission held that Acme's notices of contest placed only the penalties at issue for the table saw in docket 1811 and the metal saw and posting…
Diebold, Inc.
Press brakes required point-of-operation guarding
Diebold operated unguarded press brakes and mechanical punch presses at three Ohio plants. The Commission held that press brakes, although excluded from the specific mechanical-power-press rule, remained subject to the general machine-guarding requirements. It rejected Diebold's vagueness and…
Buckeye Industries, Inc.
Garment-machine guarding violations affirmed
Buckeye Industries manufactured men's slacks using about 101 sewing machines, four electric knives, and 11 steam pressers without point-of-operation guards. Its records showed repeated finger, hand, and eye injuries involving the cited equipment. The Commission held that OSHA proved the violations…
Clark Equipment Co.
Press-brake guarding citation affirmed
Clark Equipment manufactured heavy construction equipment using five press brakes whose points of operation were unguarded. Operators placed metal within inches of the dies, and a descending die could amputate a hand or finger. The Commission held that the general machine-guarding standard applied…
Penn Central Transportation Co.
Rail-shop safety violations and $625 penalty affirmed
OSHA cited Penn Central's railway maintenance and repair shop for 15 nonserious conditions involving fall protection, fire and chemical safety, compressed air, machine and electrical guarding, and failure to post the OSHA notice. The Commission agreed that railroad status did not remove OSHA…
Central Steel & Tank Co.
Press-brake guarding affirmed, shear item vacated
Central Steel custom-fabricated steel using two hydraulic press brakes, three mechanical power presses, and a mechanical shear cited for inadequate point-of-operation guarding. Operators held and aligned metal by hand close to the press-brake dies, which descended slowly but with enough force to…
Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing, Inc.
Punch-press citation vacation affirmed
OSHA cited Queen City because its mechanical punch presses lacked point-of-operation guards under the general machine-guarding standard at 29 C.F.R. § 1910.212(a)(3)(ii). The judge vacated the citation, reasoning that the more specific mechanical-power-press standard governed and relying on…
A & M Sheet Metal, Inc.
Ironworker guarding citation vacation affirmed
A & M operated a multipurpose Ironworker that cut and punched metal through three sets of dies activated by a foot treadle. The machine lacked a point-of-operation guard, but the operator stood about 18 inches away, held material with one hand on each side of the danger area, and the record did not…
Grand Union Company
Retail-butcher mesh-glove citations vacated
Grand Union operated retail grocery stores where butchers trimmed and deboned meat with sharp knives but did not wear steel mesh gloves. OSHA cited two stores under the general personal-protective-equipment rule, and the administrative law judges found that hand protection was required. The…
Trojan Steel Company
Oxygen-storage and punch-press items vacated by divided Commission
Trojan Steel contested two nonserious citation items, each carrying a proposed $50 penalty. One item alleged that a bulk oxygen tank was too close to a fire-resistant building wall under a 25-foot separation rule. The judge held that rule ineffective because its private consensus source had been…
Laminating Services
Failure-to-abate penalties reduced to $400
Laminating Services manufactured wood and vinyl wall covering at a Kentucky plant. It did not timely correct final citation items involving unguarded machine points of operation and unguarded sprocket wheels and chains. The company sought an extension only after the abatement deadline, and the…
Sheet Metal Specialty Co.
Press-brake guarding citation affirmed
Sheet Metal Specialty used a press brake to form metal ductwork in its Virginia fabrication shop. The operator and helper held sheets by hand with one hand as close as six to twelve inches from the unguarded point of operation. The Commission held that the general point-of-operation guarding…
Garrison & Associates, Inc.
Press-brake guarding citation restored
Garrison custom-fabricated sheet metal with two press brakes whose points of operation were unguarded. An employee was observed forming a small piece with his hands close to the operating point, although holding tools were available for small pieces. The judge vacated the guarding item after…
Irvington Moore, Division of U.S. Natural Resources, Inc.
Press-brake guarding violation reinstated
Irvington Moore manufactured sawmill machinery and used a press brake, an ironworker, and two saws at its Oregon plant. The Commission held that the general point-of-operation guarding standard applied to the press brake even though the specific mechanical power-press standard excluded press brakes…
Gem-Top MFG., Inc.
Press-brake and saw-guarding citations affirmed with reduced penalties
Gem-Top manufactured metal canopy tops for pickup trucks at its Clackamas, Oregon, plant. OSHA cited the company for operating a radial saw and swing cutoff saw without required guards and for operating two press brakes without point-of-operation guards. The Commission adopted the judge's ruling…
Champion International Corp.
Machine-guarding item vacated after employee notice
Champion International contested only item 8 of a 13-item nonserious citation. The Secretary moved to dismiss that item because the facts did not establish a violation of the point-of-operation guarding standard, and the judge vacated it. The Commission reviewed whether affected employees had…
J. R. Simplot Co.
Swing-saw guarding violation affirmed
J. R. Simplot used a 20-inch metal-cutting swing saw equipped with an adjustable blade guard. The guard could comply when allowed to float on the material, but the judge found that employees normally secured it in a raised position that left the point of operation exposed. The raised guard left…
Pyropak Manufacturing, Inc.
One abatement extension approved and three dismissed as late
Pyropak Manufacturing sought additional time to correct four nonserious citation items involving machinery and electrical conditions. The judge found the petition timely only for item 5 and extended that item's deadline to January 6, 1975. He dismissed the extension requests for items 6, 7, and 8…
James Tice, d/b/a Tice Industries
Swing-saw citation split, penalty cut to $50
Tice Industries used a metal swing saw that could extend beyond the workbench and had a blade guarded only on its upper half. The employer's informal answer timely challenged the allegation that the saw's overtravel exposed the operator's body, and the Commission found OSHA had not proved that…
Gelhaar Uniform Co.
Needle-guard violation affirmed, exit item vacated
Gelhaar manufactured uniforms using dozens of powered sewing machines without point-of-operation needle guards. The Commission affirmed that violation and its $30 penalty because the exposed needles could puncture operators and employee resistance did not excuse missing guards. It vacated a…
Colorado Fuel & Iron Steel Corp.
Serious hot-roll-line guarding violation affirmed
Colorado Fuel & Iron operated a steel mill in Pueblo, Colorado. Employees worked beside a roll table carrying steel bars heated above 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit at speeds of 15 to 20 miles per hour. The citation alleged that a recorder lacked protection from bars leaving the table and that a crop…
Sinaiko Brothers Company
Shear-guarding settlement approved with $50 penalty
OSHA cited Sinaiko Brothers for failing to provide a point-of-operation guard on a Milwaukee alligator shear. The company contested that item, then entered a settlement extending the abatement date to April 1, 1974 and agreeing to withdraw its contest and pay the proposed $50 penalty. The judge…
Muriel Manufacturing Company
Penalties for garment-shop violations affirmed
Muriel Manufacturing Company operated a contract garment-sewing shop where OSHA cited housekeeping, stairway, exit, fire-extinguisher, machine-guarding, electrical, posting, and recordkeeping conditions. The employer admitted 12 nonserious violations, while two abrasive-wheel items were vacated by…
What these documents are
- Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
- ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
- Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
- Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.