🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
FMSHRC Commission decision Docket YORK 2022-0003, PENN 2021-0108, WEVA 2022-0260 Decided July 29, 2022 Procedural

Secretary of Labor v. County Line Stone Co., Inc., et al.

Secretary of Labor v. County Line Stone Co., Inc., et al. (FMSHRC YORK 2022-0003): Premature settlement-review petition denied

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2022, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary sought interlocutory review in three cases after the judge questioned settlement proposals that included vacating citations. The judge had asked whether each vacatur was independent of the compromise of other citations, and the Secretary instead sought certification of the legal issue for Commission review. Although the judge denied certification, he had not yet granted or denied the settlement motions themselves. The Commission found the petition premature because there was no interlocutory ruling on the settlements to review. It denied the petition without prejudice, leaving the Secretary free to raise the issue after an appropriate ruling.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 820(k); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76
  • Outcome: The petition for interlocutory review was denied without prejudice as premature.
  • Key point: The Commission would not review an anticipated settlement ruling before the judge actually issued it.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH       

ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)         

v.

COUNTY
LINE STONE CO., INC.

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH       

ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)         

v.

CONSOL
PENNSYLVANIA COAL

COMPANY
LLC

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH       

ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)         

v.

RAMACO
RESOURCES, LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket
No. YORK 2022-0003

A.C.
No. 30-00026-541944

Docket
No. PENN 2021-0108

A.C.
No. 36-07416-539405

Docket
No. WEVA 2022-0260

A.C.
No. 46-09495-549775

BEFORE: Traynor,
Chair; Althen and Rajkovich, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

These
captioned cases arise under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30
U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”), and are currently before
Administrative Law Judge Michael G. Young. The Secretary filed a Petition for
Interlocutory Review with the Commission pursuant to Commission Procedural Rule
76, 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76. The Secretary’s petition seeks review of the Judge’s apparent
intention to not grant the Secretary’s motions to approve settlement. Upon
consideration of this petition and the case records, we conclude that because
the Judge has yet to rule upon the Secretary’s motions, the Secretary’s
petition is premature. In the absence of an interlocutory ruling by the Judge,
we deny the Secretary’s Petition for Interlocutory Review.

More specifically, before the Judge, the
Secretary filed motions to approve settlement which contained a proposal to
vacate one or more citations. In response, the Judge asked if the Secretary
could certify that the decision to vacate any citation was independent from,
and not contingent upon, the compromise or settlement of other citations in
that case. Instead of providing the Judge with his requested assurance, the
Secretary filed motions for certification of interlocutory review with the
Judge, requesting that the Judge certify to the Commission the question of the
Secretary’s discretion to vacate a contested citation as part of a settlement. On
June 28, 2022, the Judge issued three separate orders, each denying the
Secretary of Labor’s respective motion for certification of an interlocutory
ruling.

As the Secretary’s petition to the
Commission recognizes, the same controlling question of law is currently on
review before the Commission in Crimson Oak Grove Resources , SE
2021-0112 et al. Specifically, in Crimson Oak , the Commission granted interlocutory
review of “ of the Judge’s orders denying the motions and the issue of whether section
110(k) of the Mine Act authorizes review of the Secretary’s decision to vacate
a citation in the context of a settlement, when the vacatur is contingent upon
the resolution of other citations.” Crimson Oak , Order at 2 (March 2,
2022) (emphasis added). Notably, in these captioned cases which are the subject
of the Secretary’s petition before us, the Judge has yet to issue an order either
granting or denying the Secretary’s motions to approve settlement.

For these reasons, the Secretary’s
petition is denied without prejudice.

/s/ Arthur R.
Traynor, III

Arthur
R. Traynor, III, Chair

/s/
William I. Althen

William
I. Althen, Commissioner

/s/
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.

Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner

Distribution
(by email):

Emily Toler-Scott, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

201 12th St. South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202-5450

[email protected]

April Nelson, Esq. Associate
Solicitor

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

201 12th St. South, Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202-5450

[email protected]

Norman C. Ridley, CLR

U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA

Thorn Hill Industrial Park

178 Thorn Hill Road, Suite
100

Warrendale, PA 15086

[email protected]

Douglas Sciotto, CLR

U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA

631 Excel Drive, Suite 100

Mt. Pleasant, PA 15666

[email protected]

Chris A. Weaver, CLR

U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA

604 Cheat Road

Morgantown, WV 26508

[email protected]

Paul T. Sharlow, Esq.

Sharlow Law Firm, P.C.

P.O. Box 641

Jamesville, NY 13078

[email protected]

Craig Aaron

CONSOL Energy Inc.

10000 CONSOL Energy Drive, Suite 100

Canonsburg, PA 15317

[email protected]

Jonathan R. Ellis, Esq.

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

Chase Tower, Seventeenth Floor

P.O. Box 1588

Charleston, WV 25326

[email protected]

Colton C. Parsons, Esq.

Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

Chase Tower, Seventeenth Floor

P.O. Box 1588

Charleston, WV 25326

[email protected]

Administrative Law Judge Michael
G. Young

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review
Commission

1331 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite
520N

Washington, DC 20004-1710

[email protected]

Chief Administrative Law Judge
Glynn Voisin

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review
Commission

1331 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite
520N

Washington, DC 20004-1710

[email protected]

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

Mine Safety and Health Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

201 12th St. South,
Suite 401

Arlington, VA 22202-5450

[email protected]

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2022. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.