Secretary of Labor v. County Line Stone Co., Inc., et al.
Secretary of Labor v. County Line Stone Co., Inc., et al. (FMSHRC YORK 2022-0003): Premature settlement-review petition denied
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2022, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary sought interlocutory review in three cases after the judge questioned settlement proposals that included vacating citations. The judge had asked whether each vacatur was independent of the compromise of other citations, and the Secretary instead sought certification of the legal issue for Commission review. Although the judge denied certification, he had not yet granted or denied the settlement motions themselves. The Commission found the petition premature because there was no interlocutory ruling on the settlements to review. It denied the petition without prejudice, leaving the Secretary free to raise the issue after an appropriate ruling.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 820(k); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76
- Outcome: The petition for interlocutory review was denied without prejudice as premature.
- Key point: The Commission would not review an anticipated settlement ruling before the judge actually issued it.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
COUNTY
LINE STONE CO., INC.
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
CONSOL
PENNSYLVANIA COAL
COMPANY
LLC
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
RAMACO
RESOURCES, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. YORK 2022-0003
A.C.
No. 30-00026-541944
Docket
No. PENN 2021-0108
A.C.
No. 36-07416-539405
Docket
No. WEVA 2022-0260
A.C.
No. 46-09495-549775
BEFORE: Traynor,
Chair; Althen and Rajkovich, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
These
captioned cases arise under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30
U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”), and are currently before
Administrative Law Judge Michael G. Young. The Secretary filed a Petition for
Interlocutory Review with the Commission pursuant to Commission Procedural Rule
76, 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76. The Secretary’s petition seeks review of the Judge’s apparent
intention to not grant the Secretary’s motions to approve settlement. Upon
consideration of this petition and the case records, we conclude that because
the Judge has yet to rule upon the Secretary’s motions, the Secretary’s
petition is premature. In the absence of an interlocutory ruling by the Judge,
we deny the Secretary’s Petition for Interlocutory Review.
More specifically, before the Judge, the
Secretary filed motions to approve settlement which contained a proposal to
vacate one or more citations. In response, the Judge asked if the Secretary
could certify that the decision to vacate any citation was independent from,
and not contingent upon, the compromise or settlement of other citations in
that case. Instead of providing the Judge with his requested assurance, the
Secretary filed motions for certification of interlocutory review with the
Judge, requesting that the Judge certify to the Commission the question of the
Secretary’s discretion to vacate a contested citation as part of a settlement. On
June 28, 2022, the Judge issued three separate orders, each denying the
Secretary of Labor’s respective motion for certification of an interlocutory
ruling.
As the Secretary’s petition to the
Commission recognizes, the same controlling question of law is currently on
review before the Commission in Crimson Oak Grove Resources , SE
2021-0112 et al. Specifically, in Crimson Oak , the Commission granted interlocutory
review of “ of the Judge’s orders denying the motions and the issue of whether section
110(k) of the Mine Act authorizes review of the Secretary’s decision to vacate
a citation in the context of a settlement, when the vacatur is contingent upon
the resolution of other citations.” Crimson Oak , Order at 2 (March 2,
2022) (emphasis added). Notably, in these captioned cases which are the subject
of the Secretary’s petition before us, the Judge has yet to issue an order either
granting or denying the Secretary’s motions to approve settlement.
For these reasons, the Secretary’s
petition is denied without prejudice.
/s/ Arthur R.
Traynor, III
Arthur
R. Traynor, III, Chair
/s/
William I. Althen
William
I. Althen, Commissioner
/s/
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution
(by email):
Emily Toler-Scott, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
201 12th St. South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5450
April Nelson, Esq. Associate
Solicitor
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
201 12th St. South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5450
Norman C. Ridley, CLR
U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA
Thorn Hill Industrial Park
178 Thorn Hill Road, Suite
100
Warrendale, PA 15086
Douglas Sciotto, CLR
U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA
631 Excel Drive, Suite 100
Mt. Pleasant, PA 15666
Chris A. Weaver, CLR
U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA
604 Cheat Road
Morgantown, WV 26508
Paul T. Sharlow, Esq.
Sharlow Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 641
Jamesville, NY 13078
Craig Aaron
CONSOL Energy Inc.
10000 CONSOL Energy Drive, Suite 100
Canonsburg, PA 15317
Jonathan R. Ellis, Esq.
Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Chase Tower, Seventeenth Floor
P.O. Box 1588
Charleston, WV 25326
Colton C. Parsons, Esq.
Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Chase Tower, Seventeenth Floor
P.O. Box 1588
Charleston, WV 25326
Administrative Law Judge Michael
G. Young
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review
Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite
520N
Washington, DC 20004-1710
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Glynn Voisin
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review
Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite
520N
Washington, DC 20004-1710
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine Safety and Health Administration
U.S. Department of Labor
201 12th St. South,
Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5450
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2022. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.