Secretary of Labor v. Champlain Stone, Ltd.
Secretary of Labor v. Champlain Stone, Ltd. (FMSHRC YORK 2021-0048): Misaddressed contest excused
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Champlain Stone timely prepared a contest of proposed penalties but mailed it to MSHA's St. Louis payment office with payment for uncontested violations. The company discovered the mistake after receiving a delinquency notice and then sought reopening. The Secretary did not oppose relief but urged better procedures for future contests. The Commission found inadvertence, reopened the assessment, and remanded it for proceedings on the merits. It directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 C.F.R. § 100.7; 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28
- Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and remanded, with a penalty petition due within 45 days.
- Key point: Mailing a timely contest to MSHA's payment office instead of the proper contest address was excusable inadvertence.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004‑1710
SECRETARY OF LABOR, :
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
:
:
v.
: Docket No. YORK 2021-0048
: A.C. No. 30-02803-529358
CHAMPLAIN STONE, LTD. :
:
BEFORE: Traynor, Chair; Althen and Rajkovich,
Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §
801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On May 20, 2021, the Commission received from Champlain
Stone, Limited (“Champlain”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment
that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of
the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under
section 105(a), an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must
notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the
proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the
proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30
U.S.C. § 815(a).
We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction
to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders
under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc ., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May
1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission
has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under
which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission
on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason
justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges
shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a
harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause
for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate
proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc ., 17
FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
The Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”)
indicates that the proposed assessment was delivered to the operator on February
11, 2021. The assessment became a final order of the Commission on March 13,
2021.
Champlain asserts that it timely submitted its contest of the
citations on February 25, 2021, but that it erroneously mailed the contest to
MSHA’s St. Louis office along with its payment for other uncontested
violations. It claims that it learned of its mistake when it received the April
30, 2021 delinquency letter from MSHA on May 4, 2021. Champlain has not filed any other motions to reopen
with the Commission in the last two years. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen but urges the
operator to take steps to ensure that future penalty contests are timely filed in accordance with MSHA’s regulations at 30 C.F.R. §
100.7 and the Commission’s procedural rules.
Having
reviewed Champlain’s request and the Secretary’s response, we find that the
operator inadvertently mailed its contest form to MSHA’s St. Louis office along
with its uncontested penalty payments. In the interest of justice, we hereby
reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for
further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural
Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary
shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of
this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/
Arthur R. Traynor, III
Arthur
R. Traynor, III, Chair
/s/ William I. Althen
William
I. Althen, Commissioner
/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.
M arco M. Rajkovich Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Heidi Williams,
Safety & Health,
Champlain Stone, Ltd.
PO Box 650
Warrensburg, NY 12885
Melanie Garris
USDOL/MSHA, OAASEI/CPCO
201 12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202
Archith Ramkumar
Counsel, Appellate Litigation
Office of the Solicitor
Division of Mine Safety and
Health
U.S. Department of Labor,
201 12th Street South, Suite
401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
John M. McCracken, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
Division of Mine Safety and
Health
U.S. Department of Labor,
201 12th Street South, Suite
401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
April Nelson, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
201 12th Street South, Suite
401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Chief Administrative Law
Judge Glynn F. Voisin
Federal Mine Safety Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 520N
Washington, DC 20004-1710
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2021. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.