Secretary of Labor v. RJ Valente Gravel
Secretary of Labor v. RJ Valente Gravel (FMSHRC YORK 2018-0019): Duplicate dockets consolidated and reopened
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
RJ Valente Gravel asked the Commission to reopen default orders in four penalty dockets, and the Secretary did not oppose the motion. Two dockets covered one assessment and two covered another, so the Commission treated each pair as duplicates. It consolidated all four dockets, reopened the matters, and remanded them for further proceedings. Commissioner Althen noted that the motion had been pending for about 827 days and stated that the operator could raise any resulting prejudice before the assigned judge.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 C.F.R. § 2700.12
- Outcome: Four dockets were consolidated, reopened, and remanded.
- Key point: Duplicate dockets covering the same assessments were resolved together after the unopposed reopening motion.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : Docket No. YORK 2018-0019
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH : A.C.
No. 30-03434-448608
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) :
: Docket No. YORK 2018-0020
: A.C. No. 30-03434-448608
v. :
: Docket No. YORK 2018-0022
: A.C. No. 30-03434-450955
:
RJ VALENTE GRAVEL : Docket No. YORK 2018-0023
: A.C. No. 30-03434-450955
BEFORE: Traynor, Chair; Althen and Rajkovich, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
These matters arise under the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). 1 On August 8, 2018, the Commission received
from RJ Valente Gravel (“RJ Valente”)
a motion seeking to reopen penalty assessment proceedings and relieve it from the Default Orders entered
against it. 2 The
Secretary of Labor states that he does not
oppose the motion.
1 Two
dockets were created for assessment number 30-03434-448608 — Docket Nos. YORK 2018-0019 and YORK 2018-0020. Because these cases both deal with the
same assessment, they should be
considered duplicate dockets and resolved in tandem. Similarly, two dockets
were created for assessment number 30-03434-450955 — Docket Nos. YORK 2018- 0022 and YORK 2018-0023. These dockets should also be considered
duplicate dockets and resolved in
tandem. Moreover, all four dockets
should be consolidated. Accordingly,
we hereby consolidate docket
numbers YORK 2018-0019, YORK 2018-0020, YORK 2018-0022, and YORK 2018-0023.
29 C.F.R. § 2700.12.
2 Commissioner Althen notes the movant filed its
motion to reopen on August 8, 2018. If the movant
believes the Commissions’ failure
to respond for approximately 827 days results
in actual prejudice, the movant may bring such claim before
the assigned Judge.
Having reviewed
movant’s unopposed motion to reopen, we reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law
Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/
Arthur R. Traynor, III
Arthur
R. Traynor, III, Chair
/s/
William I. Althen
William I. Althen, Commissioner
/s/
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.
Marco M.
Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Michael T Cimino, Esq.
Jackson Kelly PLLC
500 Lee Street East
Suite 1600
Charleston, WV 25301
John M. McCracken, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
Division of Mine Safety and Health
U.S. Department of Labor
201 12th Street South,
Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
April Nelson, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
201 12th Street South,
Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Glynn Voisin
Federal Mine Safety & Health
Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Suite 520N
Washington, DC 20004-1710
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty
Compliance
Mine Safety and Health
Administration
201 12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2021. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.