Secretary of Labor v. Pedrotti Materials, LLC
Secretary of Labor v. Pedrotti Materials, LLC (FMSHRC WEST 2020-0275 M): Misaddressed assessment never became final
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Pedrotti Materials did not receive a proposed penalty assessment because MSHA mailed it to the wrong address. The Secretary confirmed the agency's addressing error. The Commission held that the assessment never became final because the operator had not received it, so Rule 60 reopening relief was unnecessary. It declared the reopening motion moot and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The reopening motion was declared moot and the case was remanded.
- Key point: A proposed assessment mailed to the wrong address did not start the 30-day contest period or become a final Commission order.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
PEDROTTI
MATERIALS, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. WEST 2020-0275-M
A.C.
No. 04-05724-505659
BEFORE: Traynor,
Chair; Althen and Rajkovich, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This proceeding arises under the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§
801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). On May 12, 2020, Pedrotti Materials, LLC filed
a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment under section 105(a) of the
Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a), that had appeared to become a final order of the
Commission.
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an
operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of
Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If
the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is
deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Pedrotti asserts that it never received
the proposed penalty assessment at issue because the Secretary mailed it to the
wrong address. The Secretary confirms that his Mine Safety and Health
Administration erroneously mailed the proposed assessment to an incorrect
address.
Having reviewed Pedrotti’s request and the
Secretary's response, we conclude that the proposed penalty assessment did not
become a final order of the Commission because the operator never received the
proposed assessment. This obviates any need to invoke Rule 60(b) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure in order to consider reopening a final order.
Accordingly, the operator's motion to
reopen is moot, and this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge
for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission's
Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ Arthur R. Traynor, III
Arthur R. Traynor, III, Chair
/s/ William I. Althen
William I. Althen, Commissioner
/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Jason Pedrotti
Pedrotti
Materials, LLC
P.O. Box 994283
Redding, CA 96099
John
M. McCracken, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
Mine
Safety and Health Division
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202-5452
Archith
Ramkumar, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202
April
Nelson, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
Mine
Safety and Health Division
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202-5452
Melanie
Garris
U.S.
Department of Labor
Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine
Safety and Health Administration
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202-5452
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glenn Voisin
Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2021. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.