Secretary of Labor v. Teck Alaska, Inc.

Plain-English summary

Teck Alaska sought to reopen a penalty assessment that became final before it reached the mine site. With the employee who normally routed assessments on leave, a summer intern placed the unopened envelope in a cargo basket. Regional weather and limited flights delayed delivery to the remote mine for more than 30 days. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but urged Teck to improve its procedures. The Commission found inadvertence or mistake, reopened the assessment, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Decision snapshot

• Cited authority: None
• Outcome: The final penalty assessment was reopened and remanded for further proceedings.
• Key point: An internal routing error combined with weather-delayed delivery to a remote mine supported reopening.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH    

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)           

v.

TECK
ALASKA, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket
No. WEST 2019-0446-M

A.C.
No. 50-01545-491155

BEFORE:  Rajkovich,
Chairman; Althen and Traynor, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE
COMMISSION: 

This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §
801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”).  On July 1, 2019, the Commission received from
Teck Alaska, Inc. (“Teck”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that
had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the
Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

Under
section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after
receiving the proposed penalty assessment.  If the operator fails to notify the
Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the
Commission.  30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested
assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim
Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“ JWR ”).  In
evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance
in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the
Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the
basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying
relief.  See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall
be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR ,
15 FMSHRC at 787.  We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and
that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be
reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted.  See Coal
Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

Records
of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”)
indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered on May 20, 2019, and became
a final order of the Commission on June 19, 2019.  Teck states that the
proposed penalty assessment was received in its corporate office in Anchorage,
Alaska on May 18, 2019.  The person who typically opens the proposed
assessments and e-mails them to the safety department was on leave that day. 
Instead, a summer intern placed the unopened envelope in a basket to be shipped
to the mine site via cargo services.  Shipment was delayed by more than 30 days
due to regional weather and limited delivery flights to the mine.  The
assessment was received by the mine on June 21, 2019, after it had become a
final order of the Commission.  The Secretary does not oppose the request to
reopen, but urges the operator to take steps to ensure that future penalty
contests are timely filed. 

Having
reviewed Teck’s request and the Secretary’s
response, we find that Teck failed to timely contest the penalties
through inadvertence or mistake, and that such inadvertence or mistake
constitutes good cause to reopen the penalty proceeding.  In the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this
matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further
proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29
C.F.R. Part 2700.  Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary
shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of
this order.  See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.

/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.

Marco
M. Rajkovich, Jr., Chairman

/s/ William I. Althen

William
I. Althen, Commissioner

/s/ Arthur R. Traynor, III

Arthur R. Traynor, III, Commissioner

Distribution:

Laura
E. Beverage

Jackson
Kelly PLLC

[email protected]

Emily
Scott, Esq.

Office
of the Solicitor

[email protected]

Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glynn Voisin

Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

[email protected]

Melanie
Garris

Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance

Mine
Safety and Health Administration

[email protected]