Secretary of Labor v. Terra Excavating, LLC

Plain-English summary

Terra said it never received the proposed assessment. Its counsel contacted MSHA to ask about the assessment's status and obtained a duplicate copy. Terra promptly attempted to contest it, then moved to reopen after MSHA said the contest was late. The Commission found good cause based on Terra's good-faith prompt filing, reopened the assessment, and remanded the case.

Decision snapshot

• Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
• Outcome: The assessment was reopened and remanded.
• Key point: Promptly contesting after obtaining a duplicate of an assessment the operator said it never received established good cause.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)

                    v.

TERRA
EXCAVATING, LLC

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Docket
No. SE 2023-0048

A.C.
No. 09-01264-563564

BEFORE: Jordan,
Chair; Althen, Rajkovich, and Baker, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

        This

case arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §
801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). On November 29, 2022, the Commission received
from Terra Excavating, LLC (“Terra”) a motion to reopen a final order of the
Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

        Under

section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after
receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the
Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the
Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

        We

have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested
assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim
Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In
evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance
in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the
Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the
basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying
relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall
be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR,
15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and
that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be
reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep.
Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

        Records

of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”)
indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered to the operator on September
26, 2022, and became a final order of the Commission on October 26, 2022. On
November 29, 2022, Terra filed a motion to reopen, stating that it failed to
timely file contest because it never received the proposed assessment. The
owner of the company states that counsel contacted MSHA on November 8, 2022 to
inquire about the status of the assessment. He was provided a duplicate copy of
the assessment and promptly attempted to file to contest. On November 21, 2022,
Terra received notice from MSHA that the contest was received out of time.

Having reviewed Terra’s request and the Secretary’s response, we find that Terra
has demonstrated good cause by its good faith prompt filing after learning of
the assessment. In the interest of justice, we
hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge
for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s
Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule
28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45
days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.

/s/
Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan,
Chair

/s/ William I.
Althen

William I. Althen,
Commissioner

/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich,
Jr.

Marco M.
Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner

/s/ Timothy J.
Baker

Timothy J. Baker,
Commissioner

Distribution:

Karl
F. Kumli, Esq.

Jackson
Lewis P.C.

950
17th Street, Suite 2600

Denver,
CO 80202

[email protected]

April
Nelson, Esq.

Associate
Solicitor

Office
of the Solicitor

U.S.
Department of Labor

Division
of Mine Safety and Health

201
12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202

[email protected]

Emily
Toler Scott, Esq.

Counsel
for Appellate Litigation

Office
of the Solicitor

U.S.
Department of Labor

Division
of Mine Safety and Health

201
12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202

[email protected]

Melanie
Garris

USDOL/MSHA,
OAASEI/CPCO

201
12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202

[email protected]

Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin

Federal
Mine Safety Health Review Commission

Office
of the Chief Administrative Law Judge

1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 520N

Washington,
DC 20004-1710

[email protected]