Secretary of Labor v. Arnold Hoskins
Secretary of Labor v. Arnold Hoskins (FMSHRC KENT 2015-0644): Reopening motion denied as moot
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Arnold Hoskins asked the Commission to reopen a $4,800 penalty matter after MSHA sent him a delinquency notice. The Chief Administrative Law Judge had previously ordered the Secretary to file a penalty petition and explain the delay. When the Secretary did not comply, the case was dismissed on December 22, 2017. The Commission held that no penalty had been assessed or remained collectible, so it denied the reopening motion as moot.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
- Outcome: The motion to reopen was denied as moot, and no $4,800 penalty was owed or collectible.
- Key point: A dismissed penalty case left no final assessment for the respondent to reopen.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
ARNOLD
HOSKINS
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. KENT 2015-0644
A.C.
No. 15-18870-387869A
BEFORE: Traynor , Chair; Althen
and Rajkovich, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §
801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). On July 3, 2018, the Commission received from Arnold
Hoskins a motion to reopen the above-captioned civil penalty proceeding. In the
motion, Hoskins explains that he had filed a timely contest of a proposed
penalty assessment in the amount of $4,800 for an alleged violation related to
Citation No. 8400829-00019613A. He states that, although he was never afforded
an opportunity for a hearing on the contest, he received a notice from the
Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration informing him that
he was delinquent in paying the $4,800 penalty.
On November 21, 2017, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge issued an Order to Show Cause and Dismissal Order. In the order, the
Judge directed the Secretary of Labor to submit a penalty petition and an
explanation stating why he failed to initially submit the penalty petition in a
timely fashion. The order further stated that if the Secretary failed to do so,
on the thirty-first day after the November 21 order, the case would be
dismissed. The Secretary failed to submit a petition, and the case was
dismissed on December 22, 2017.
This case has been dismissed; the proposed
penalty of $4,800 has not been assessed and no penalty is owed or collectible. Therefore,
we deny Hoskins’ motion to reopen as moot.
/s/ Arthur R. Traynor, III
Arthur
R. Traynor, III, Chair
/s/
William I. Althen
William
I. Althen, Commissioner
/s/
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Arnold
Hoskins
5881
Mt. Zion Road
East
Bernstadt, KY 40729
Archith
Ramkumar, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202
April
Nelson, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202-5452
Melanie
Garris
Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine
Safety and Health Administration
201
12th Street South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202-5452
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glynn Voisin
Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Office
of the Chief Administrative Law Judge
1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2021. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.