🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
FMSHRC Commission decision Docket CENT 2025-0180 Decided March 19, 2025 Procedural

Secretary of Labor v. Cactus Canyon Quarries, Inc.

Secretary of Labor v. Cactus Canyon Quarries, Inc. (FMSHRC CENT 2025-0180): Disciplinary briefing stayed

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2025, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

An administrative law judge referred a disciplinary matter involving counsel for Cactus Canyon Quarries from the related CENT 2023-0045 cases. The Commission opened a separate disciplinary docket, CENT 2025-0180. It then stayed further briefing on the disciplinary matter until a later Commission order. This order did not decide whether discipline was warranted.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: None stated in the order
  • Outcome: Further briefing in the disciplinary proceeding was stayed.
  • Key point: The Commission paused the separate counsel-discipline matter arising from the related penalty cases.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.,
N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC
20004-1710

SECRETARY
OF LABOR

MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH     

ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)

v.

CACTUS
CANYON QUARRIES, INC

DISCIPLINARY
PROCEEDING

Docket
No. CENT 2025-0180

BEFORE:
Jordan, Chair; Baker and Marvit, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter
arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et
seq. (2018) (“Mine Act” or “Act”). A disciplinary proceeding referral was
initiated by the Commission Administrative Law Judge against counsel for Cactus
Canyon Quarries, Inc. (“Cactus Canyon”) in Docket No. CENT 2023-0045, et. al. The
disciplinary proceeding has been assigned the above-captioned docket number. Further
briefing on the disciplinary matter is stayed pending further order of the
Commission.

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Chair

/s/ Timothy J. Baker

Timothy
J. Baker, Commissioner

/s/ Moshe Z. Marvit

Moshe
Z. Marvit, Commissioner

Distribution

Andy
Carson, Esq.

Cactus Canyon Quarries

7232 CR 120

Marble Falls, TX 78654

[email protected]

Felix R. Marquez, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

525 Griffin Street, Suite 501

Dallas, TX 75202

[email protected]

Jennifer A. Ledig, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

Division of Mine Safety &
Health

201 12th Street South, Suite
401

Arlington, VA 22202

[email protected]

Thomas
A. Paige, Esq.

Deputy
Associate Solicitor

US
Department of Labor

Office
of the Solicitor

Division
of Mine Safety and Health

200
Constitution Avenue NW, Suite N4428

Washington,
DC 20210

[email protected]

Melanie
Garris

US
Department of Labor/MSHA

Office
of Assessments, Room N3454

200
Constitution Ave NW

Washington,
DC 20210

[email protected]

Administrative
Law Judge Thomas P. McCarthy

Office
of the Chief Administrative Law Judge

Federal
Mine Safety Health Review Commission

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 520N

Washington, DC 20004-1710

[email protected]

Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin

Office
of the Chief Administrative Law Judge

Federal Mine Safety Health Review Commission

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 520N

Washington, DC 20004-1710

[email protected]

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2025. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.