🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
FMSHRC Commission decision Docket CENT 2023-0057 Decided September 13, 2023 Remanded

Secretary of Labor v. Cooper Stone

Secretary of Labor v. Cooper Stone (FMSHRC CENT 2023-0057): Pandemic staff illnesses supported reopening

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Cooper Stone said its normal practice was to contest proposed penalties immediately after receiving them. Staff illnesses during the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted that process and caused it to miss the deadline. The Commission found good cause, reopened the assessment, and remanded the case. It also directed the Secretary to issue a new penalty petition because an earlier petition had been issued through an administrative mistake.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
  • Outcome: The assessment was reopened and remanded.
  • Key point: Pandemic-related staff illnesses that disrupted the operator's normal contest process established good cause.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)

                    v.

COOPER
STONE

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Docket
No. CENT 2023-0057

A.C.
No. 41-03401-552869

BEFORE: Jordan,
Chair; Althen, Rajkovich, and Baker, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

        This

case arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §
801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). On December 13, 2022, the Commission received
from Cooper Stone (“Cooper”) a motion to reopen a final order of the Commission
pursuant to section 105(a) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

        Under

section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after
receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the
Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the
Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

        We

have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested
assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim
Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In
evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance
in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the
Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the
basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying
relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall
be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR,
15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and
that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened
and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs.,
Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

        Records

of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”)
indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered to the operator on April 18,
2022, and became a final order of the Commission on May 18, 2022. On December
13, 2022, Cooper filed a motion to reopen, stating that its failure to timely
file was the result of mistake or inadvertence. Cooper asserts that its
standard practice is to file to contest proposed penalties immediately upon
receipt, however, staff illnesses during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted its ability
to meet the filing deadline.

Having reviewed Cooper’s request and the Secretary’s response, we find that Cooper
has demonstrated good cause for its failure to timely file to contest. In the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this
matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further
proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29
C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary
shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of
this order.[1]
See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.

/s/
Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan,
Chair

/s/ William I.
Althen

William I. Althen,
Commissioner

/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich,
Jr.

Marco M.
Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner

/s/ Timothy J.
Baker

Timothy J. Baker,
Commissioner

Distribution:

Micah
Flippen

Owner,
Cooper Stone

1003
Hemingway Drive

College
Station, TX 77845

[email protected]

April
Nelson, Esq.

Associate
Solicitor

Office
of the Solicitor

U.S.
Department of Labor

Division
of Mine Safety and Health

201
12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202

[email protected]

Emily
Toler Scott, Esq.

Counsel
for Appellate Litigation

Office
of the Solicitor

U.S.
Department of Labor

Division
of Mine Safety and Health

201
12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202

[email protected]

Melanie
Garris

USDOL/MSHA,
OAASEI/CPCO

201
12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202

[email protected]

Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin

Federal
Mine Safety Health Review Commission

1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 520N

Washington,
DC 20004-1710

[email protected]

[1] On April 3, 2023,
the Secretary filed a petition for assessment of penalty for the captioned
matter. The issuance of the April 3, 2023 petition must have been due to an
administrative mistake on the part of the Secretary, as the uncontested
assessment become a final order of the Commission on May 18, 2022. Accordingly,
the Secretary shall issue a new penalty petition pursuant to the terms of this
order.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2023. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.