Secretary of Labor v. Delhur Industries, Inc.
Secretary of Labor v. Delhur Industries, Inc. (FMSHRC CENT 2020-0099): Claimed nonreceipt supported reopening
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2020, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Delhur Industries said it never received the proposed penalty assessment and first learned of it from an MSHA delinquency notice. The operator contacted MSHA and followed the agency's direction to seek relief from the Commission. The Secretary did not oppose reopening. The Commission found inadvertence or mistake amounting to good cause, reopened the assessment, and remanded it for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 30 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b), 2700.28
- Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and the matter was remanded.
- Key point: Claimed nonreceipt supported relief where the operator acted after the delinquency notice and followed MSHA's instructions.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
DELHUR
INDUSTRIES, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. CENT 2020-0099-M
A.C.
No. 45-03093-504693
BEFORE: Rajkovich,
Chairman; Althen and Traynor, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE
COMMISSION:
This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §
801 et seq. (2018) (“Mine Act”). On March 16, 2020, the Commission received
from DelHur Industries, Inc. (“DelHur”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty
assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section
105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under
section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after
receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the
Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the
Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested
assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim
Walter Res., Inc. , 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“ JWR ”). In
evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance
in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the
Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the
basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying
relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall
be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR ,
15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and
that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be
reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep.
Servs., Inc. , 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Records
of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”)
indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered on December 11, 2019, and
became a final order of the Commission on January 10, 2020. DelHur contends
that it never received the proposed penalty assessment and was not aware of the
assessment until it received MSHA’s delinquency notice, which was sent on
February 25, 2020. Upon receipt of MSHA’s delinquency notice, DelHur contacted
MSHA, which directed the operator to contact the Commission. DelHur then filed this
motion to reopen the final penalty assessment. The Secretary does not oppose
the request to reopen, but urges the operator to take steps to ensure that
future penalty contests are timely filed.
Having
reviewed DelHur’s request and the Secretary’s
response, we find that DelHur failed to timely contest penalties through
inadvertence or mistake, and that such inadvertence or mistake constitutes good
cause to reopen the penalty proceeding. In the
interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief
Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and
the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent
with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of
penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. §
2700.28.
/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.
Marco
M. Rajkovich, Jr., Chairman
/s/ William I. Althen
William
I. Althen, Commissioner
/s/ Arthur R. Traynor, III
Arthur R. Traynor, III, Commissioner
Distribution:
Eddee
Smay
DelHur
Industries, Inc.
Emily
Scott, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glynn Voisin
Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Melanie
Garris
Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine
Safety and Health Administration
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2020. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.