D'Ambra Construction Company, Inc.

Plain-English summary

D'Ambra Construction was cited for beginning excavation work without first determining the location of an underground gas line. The judge issued a bench decision after an E-Z Trial hearing. The serious violation was affirmed. The proposed $4,000 penalty was reduced to $1,000.

Decision snapshot

• Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1926.651(b)(1)
• Outcome: The serious utility-location violation was affirmed, and the penalty was reduced from $4,000 to $1,000.
• Key point: An employer must determine the estimated location of underground utilities before opening an excavation.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

                                        :

SECRETARY OF LABOR, :
Complainant, :
:
v. : OSHRC
: Docket No. 97-0150
D’AMBRA CONSTRUCTION :
COMPANY, INC., :
Respondent. :
:
:

Appearances:
Kevin E. Sullivan, Esq. Christopher J. Maxwell, Vice President
Office of the Solicitor D’Ambra Construction Company, Inc.
U.S. Department of Labor Warwick, Rhode Island
For Complainant For Respondent
Before: Administrative Law Judge Robert A. Yetman
DECISION AND ORDER
This proceeding arises under § 10(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29
U.S.C. § 651, et seq (“the Act”) to review a citation issued by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to §
9(a) of the Act and a proposed assessment of penalty thereon issued pursuant to § 10(a) of the Act.
On January 13, 1997, Respondent D’Ambra Construction Company was issued one serious
citation alleging a single violation of the standard set forth at 29 CFR 1926.65(b)(1). The citation
reads as follows:
29 CFR 1926.651(b)(1): The estimated location of underground utility
installations, such as sewer, telephone, fuel, electric, water lines, or
any other underground installations that reasonably may be expected
to be encountered during excavation work, was not determined prior
to opening an excavation:

            (a) Jobsite: The location of an underground gas line was not
            determined prior to excavation operations.

A penalty in the amount of $4,000 was proposed by the Secretary.
 Respondent filed a timely notice of contest and this matter was assigned for E-Z Trial
proceedings pursuant to commission Rules 29 CFR 2200.200 et seq. A hearing was conducted on
April 25, 1997 and in accordance with Commission Rule 209(f), a decision was issued from the bench
affirming the citation as a serious violation and assessing a penalty in the amount of $1,000. Findings
of fact and conclusions of law as required by commission Rule 90(a) are set forth at transcript pages
118 to 125 attached hereto.
All findings of fact relevant and necessary to a determination of the contested issues have been
made as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a). All proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law
inconsistent with this decision are denied.
ORDER
Serious Citation No. 1, Item No. 1 alleging a violation of 29 CFR 1926.651(b)(1) is affirmed
and a penalty in the amount of $1,000 is assessed.

                                    ROBERT A. YETMAN
                                    Judge, OSHRC

Dated:
Boston, MA

                                                2