Gutknecht Construction Co.
Settlement approved as final order
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1997, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
After the case was directed for Commission review, the parties filed a stipulation and settlement agreement. The Commission found that the agreement raised no issue warranting further review and was consistent with the Occupational Safety and Health Act and Commission rules. It incorporated the settlement into its order and set aside the ALJ decision to the extent it conflicted with the agreement.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None identified in the Commission order.
- Outcome: The settlement was incorporated into the final order, and the ALJ decision was set aside where inconsistent.
- Key point: A settlement filed during Commission review can replace inconsistent portions of the ALJ decision and become the Commission's final order.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
United States of America
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor
Washington, DC 20036-3419
Office of Phone: (202) 606-5100
Executive Secretary Fax: (202) 606-5050
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR, :
:
Complainant, :
:
v. : OSHRC Docket No. 95-0956
:
GUTKNECHT CONSTRUCTION CO., :
:
Respondent. :
:
ORDER
This matter is before the Commission on a direction for review entered by Commissioner
Daniel Guttman on August 9, 1996. The parties have now filed a stipulation and settlement
agreement.
Having reviewed the record, and based upon the representations appearing in the
stipulation and settlement agreement, we conclude that this case raises no matters warranting
further review by the Commission. The terms of the stipulation and settlement agreement do not
appear to be contrary to the purposes of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and are in
compliance with the Commission's Rules of Procedure.
Accordingly, we incorporate the terms of the stipulation and settlement agreement into
this order, and we set aside the Administrative Law Judge's decision and order to the extent that
2
it is inconsistent with the stipulation and settlement agreement. This is the final order of the
Commission in this case. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 659(c), 660(a), and (b).
/s/
Stuart E. Weisberg
Chairman
Date: July 18, 1997 /s/
Daniel Guttman
Commissioner
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1997. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.