🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
OSHRC Commission decision Docket 91-2537 Decided July 26, 1994 Settled

Harris Masonry, Inc.

EAJA fee award reduced by settlement

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1994, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1994
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Harris Masonry had received an attorney-fee award after prevailing in its OSHA case. The Secretary petitioned for review of the hourly rate used in that award, and the parties then settled the Equal Access to Justice Act dispute. The Secretary withdrew the petition, and Harris agreed that its attorney fees would be calculated at the statutory rate of $75 per hour. The agreement reduced the fee component from $7,185 to $5,388.75 for 71.85 hours, with costs still included. The Commission incorporated the agreement, set aside inconsistent portions of the judge's order, and made the settlement its final order.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): None. This order resolves an attorney-fee award under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
  • Outcome: Settled. Attorney fees were reduced to $5,388.75, plus costs, and the Secretary withdrew the petition for review.
  • Key point: An EAJA settlement may replace the judge's fee award and become the Commission's final order.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

                                                .
                                                .

SECRETARY OF LABOR, ..
..
Complainant ..
..
v. .. Docket No. 91-2537

HARRIS MASONRY, INC.,

            Respondent.



                                        ORDER

   This matter is before the Commission on a direction for review entered by Stuart E.

Weisberg, Chairman, on June 14, 1994. The parties have now filed a stipulation and
settlement agreement.

    Having reviewed the record, and based upon the representations appearing in the

stipulation and settlement agreement, we conclude that this case raises no matters
warranting further review by the Commission. The terms of the stipulation and settlement
agreement do not appear to be contrary to the purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act,
5 U.S.C. 8 504, and are in compliance with the Commission’s Rules of Procedure.
\ . 4$
Accordingly, we incorporate the terms of the stipulation and settlement agreement
into this order, and we set aside the Administrative Law Judge’s decision and order to the
extent that it is inconsistent with the stipulation and settlement agreement. This is the final
order of the Commission in this case.

                                                BY DIRECTION OFTHE COMMISSION

Dated July 26, 1994

                                                Executive Secretary


                      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
          OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEAfrTHREVIEw COMMISSION c,  '3
                                                      ,-
                                                      \.-> -   7 !,
                                                       I.
                                                        -
                                                       _-  L-2   ">
                                                       I.
                                                       I-.        .+
                                                          .                -
                                        .                                  -                  i   .
                                                                                          I
                                                                           fv                 ,
                                                                   .        CL
                                                                                        - .a.
                                                              ---                      . --9
                                                              ci d.” >                i i t
                                                                  .i
                                            :
                                                                       *

ROBERT 8. REICH, SECRETARY OF LABOR, :
:
Complainant0 1
@
0
V. : OSHRC Docket No.
6
l 91-2533
:
HARRIS MASONRY, iNC, :
:
Respondent. :
:

                WPIPULATIOBI AND 8ETTtEMENI) AGReZ!MENT




  The parties have reached agreement on a full and complete

settlement and disposition of the issues in this proceeding which
.
are currently panding before the Commission. It is hereby

stipulated and agrcdd between tha Complainant, Srcrrtary of rS
Labor, and the.Respondent, Harris Masonry, Inc., that:

  1   l   The.Secretary hereby withdraws tho Petition for

DiscretionaryRevirw regarding the judge’s award of attcxnoy fees
above the statutory limit under the Equal Access.to Justice Act
(EAJA)@ 5 U.&C. $504.

  2   l   In recognition of the statutory limit of $75.00 per

hour, respondent agrees to a reduction in the amount awarded by
+ Judge Schoenfcld, from $7,185.00 to $5,X38.75 (71.85 hours @

$75.00 per hour) -in attorney fees, plus costs.
3 Respondent certifies that a copy 9f this Stipulation and /
.r**
l

                                              l   .

Settlement Agreement was posted at the workplace m ‘)

1994, in accordancewith Rules 7 and 100 of the Cosmissi
9 n's
Rules of Procedure%, and will xemain posted for a pwiod of ten
days.
4. There is no authorized employee rsprerentative, and no
affected rmployee elected party status in this cue.

                                          Resprctfullysubmitted,
                                   "MOMAS S. WILLIAMSON, Jr.
                                   Solicitor of Labor
                                   JOSEPH M, WOODWARD.
                                   Associate Solicitor for
                                     OccupationalSafety and Health
                                   DONALD G. SHALHOUB
                                   Deputy Amociata Solicitor for
                                     Occupational
                                       .          Safety and Health
                                   DANIEL J. MICK
                                   Counsel            for Regional
                                      Trial           Litigation

/*t&my f6r.the Aerney for the
-/ Reepondwtt Secretary of Labor

                 CERTIFICATE   OF SERVICE


I:certify that a copy of the fully executed Stipulation and

Settlement agreement was mailed postage prepaid on July 20, 1994:
Henry G. Beamer, Esq.
1330 Grant Building
Pittsburgh, PA 19104

                                kttorney for the
                                  Secretary of Labor

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1994. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.