Cleveland Marble Mosaic Company

Plain-English summary

OSHA issued three serious items and one nonserious item, initially proposing $1,800 in penalties. The Secretary later withdrew one serious item and its $540 penalty. Cleveland Marble did not answer the complaint or oppose the Secretary's default motion, and the judge mistakenly affirmed all items and assessed the original $1,800. The Commission corrected the order by dismissing the contest, affirming the three remaining items, and assessing $1,260.

Decision snapshot

• Cited standard(s): Not stated in the decision.
• Outcome: Default order modified; one item withdrawn, three items affirmed, and total penalties reduced from $1,800 to $1,260.
• Key point: A default order must reflect citation items and penalties the Secretary withdrew in the complaint.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 88-1777

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

CLEVELAND MARBLE MOSAIC COMPANY,

Respondent.

OSHRC DOCKET NO. 88-1777

Before: BUCKLEY, Chairman, and AREY, Commissioner.

BY THE COMMISSION:

JOINT DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND COMMISSION ORDER

The Respondent has filed a Petition for Discretionary Review.
Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. � 661(j) and 29 C.F.R. � 2200.92(a), the report of the
Administrative Law Judge is directed for review, but only for the limited purpose of
correcting an error in the judge's Order Entered Upon Secretary's Motion for Entry of
Default.

On June 27, 1988, the Secretary issued two citations to the
Respondent. Citation 1 alleged three serious violations of the Act and proposed penalties
totaling $1800. Specifically, the Secretary proposed a penalty of $540 for the violation
alleged in item 1 and penalties of $630 each for the violations alleged in items 2 and 3.
No penalty was proposed for the single, nonserious violation alleged in Citation 2.

The Respondent contested all of the alleged violations and proposed penalties. Several
months later, the Secretary filed her complaint. Paragraph IV of the complaint included
the following statement:

Complainant hereby withdraws Citation No. 1, Item 1, and the
proposed penalty therefore (sic).

With this exception, the complaint made no changes in the
allegations of the two citations. Accordingly, the total penalty proposed in the complaint
was $1260--that is, $630 each for the violations alleged in items 2 and 3 of Citation 1.

The Respondent failed to answer the Secretary's complaint and
also failed to respond to the Secretary's motion for a default judgment under 29 C.F.R. �
2200.41(a). The judge therefore entered his order granting the Secretary's unopposed
motion. Specifically, the judge ordered "that the notice of contest is dismissed, the
citations are affirmed, and penalties in the total amount of $1800 are assessed."

We hereby modify that order as follows. We treat the
Secretary's notice of withdrawal as a motion to withdraw item 1 of Citation 1 and the
corresponding proposed penalty of $540, and we grant the motion. We dismiss the notice of
contest, affirm the three remaining citation items, and assess penalties in the total
amount of $1260, as proposed in the Secretary's complaint.

FOR THE COMMISSION

RAY H.DARLING, JR.

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

DATED: March 2, 1989

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant

v.

CLEVELAND MARBLE MOSAIC COMPANY

Respondent

OSHRC Docket No. 88-1777

ORDER ENTERED UPON SECRETARY'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Respondent, Cleveland Marble Mosaic Company, was cited on June
24, 1988, for alleged serious (citation number 1) and nonserious (citation number 2)
violations of three construction safety standards, and a recording requirement. The
Secretary proposed that penalties be assessed for citation number 1 in the total amount of
$1,800. Respondent contested the matters.

The Secretary served and filed a complaint on October 24, 1988.
Under Commission procedural Rules 4(b) and 34(d)(1), 29 C.F.R. �� 2200.4(b) and
34(d)(1), respondent was required to file an answer by November 27, 1988. To date, the
answer has yet to be filed.

On November 8, 1988, the Secretary moved to dismiss the notice
of contest for failure to answer the complaint. Respondent has not responded to the
Secretary's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, pursuant to Commission Rule 41(a), 29 C.F.R.
� 2200.41(a), it is ORDERED that the Secretary's unopposed motion to dismiss the notice
of contest is granted. It is further ORDERED that the notice of contest is dismissed, the
citations are affirmed, and penalties in the total amount of $1,800 are assessed.

RICHARD DeBENEDETTO

Judge, OSHRC

Dated: January 26, 1989

Boston, Massachusetts