🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
Ezel / Agency Decisions / 86-0651-commission
OSHRC Commission decision Docket 86-0651 Decided August 6, 1986 Procedural

Robert Aaron Greenberg, Esquire, and The Law Firm of Tomar, Parks, Seliger, Simonoff & Adourian

Disciplinary proceeding closed without findings

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1986, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1986
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Commission received an apology from attorney Robert Aaron Greenberg and his law firm concerning the circumstances that led to a disciplinary proceeding. They also assured the Commission that they would use their best efforts to follow Commission rules and orders in the future. Because the events were old and the Commission accepted the apology and assurances, it terminated the proceeding. The Commission made no findings on the disputed matters and directed that no inferences be drawn.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): None.
  • Outcome: Disciplinary proceeding closed without factual findings.
  • Key point: Closure based on an accepted apology and future-compliance assurances did not resolve the underlying allegations.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 86-0651-D

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

regarding

ROBERT AARON GREENBERG, ESQUIRE,

and

THE LAW FIRM OF TOMAR, PARKS,

SELIGER, SIMONOFF & ADOURIAN.

OSHRC Docket No-86-651-D

ORDER

Before:  BUCKLEY, Chairman; RADER and WALL,
Commissioners.

BY THE COMMISSION:

The Commission has received an apology from Robert
Aaron Greenberg, Esquire and the law firm of Tomar, Seliger, Simonoff, Adourian &
O'Brien regarding the circumstances surrounding this proceeding and assurances that the
parties will use their best efforts in the future to act in conformance with Commission
rules and orders.  Because the events involved in this proceeding are old and because
the Commission accepts the apology and assurances that it has received, we consider it
appropriate to terminate the proceeding on this basis alone.  We make no findings
with regard to the matters at issue nor should any inferences be drawn.  The case is
hereby CLOSED.

FOR THE COMMISSION

Ray H. Darling, Jr.

Executive Secretary

DATED:  August 6, 1986

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1986. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.