Otis Elevator Company
Settlement approved with $545 aggregate penalty
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1974, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Otis Elevator and the Secretary entered into a settlement agreement, and the company moved to withdraw its notice of contest. The judge initially dismissed the proceeding after finding that the parties had satisfied the Commission's settlement rule. The Commission set aside that dismissal and substituted an order approving the settlement, granting the withdrawal, affirming the citations, and assessing an aggregate penalty of $545. The official release does not identify the cited standards or describe the underlying conditions.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): Not identified in the official release
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, the citations were affirmed, and an aggregate penalty of $545 was assessed.
- Key point: The Commission replaced a general dismissal with an order stating the settlement's operative effect on the citations and penalties.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 8482
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
OSHRC Docket No. 8482
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
September 26, 1974
�
[*1]
�
Before MORAN, Chairman; VAN NAMEE and CLEARY, Commissioners
OPINION:
�
BY THE COMMISSION: Pursuant to the provisions of 29 U.S.C. 661(i) we hereby direct review of the order entered by Judge Ben D. Worcester in this case.
�
We set aside the Judge's order and substitute the following: The parties' settlement agreement is approved, respondent's motion to withdraw its notice of contest is granted, the citations issued to respondent are affirmed, and an aggregate penalty of $545 is assessed therefor.
�
It is so ORDERED.
[The Judge's decision referred to herein follows]
WORCESTER, JUDGE, OSAHRC: The parties have entered into a Stipulation of Settlement and have complied with all of the requirements of Commission Rule 100.
�
It is accordingly hereby ordered that this proceeding be dismissed.
�
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1974. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.