Eastern Steel Erectors, Inc.
EAJA fee claim settled for $4,330
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1985, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Eastern Steel Erectors had an application pending for attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The parties agreed to end the fee dispute without further litigation. The Department of Labor agreed to pay $4,330 without conceding that the company was entitled to fees. In exchange, Eastern Steel withdrew its application and waived all other attorney-fee and expense claims connected with the citations and the EAJA proceeding. The Commission approved the agreement and terminated the proceeding.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None identified in this EAJA release.
- Outcome: EAJA application withdrawn in exchange for a $4,330 payment.
- Key point: The settlement fully resolved the company’s attorney-fee claims without an admission that fees were legally owed.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 83-1107
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
EASTERN STEEL ERECTORS, INC.,
Respondent.
OSHRC DOCKET NO. 83-1107 (EAJA)
ORDER
The parties' Stipulation and Settlement Agreement on the above-captioned Equal Access to
Justice Act case is approved.
FOR THE COMMISSION
RAY H. DARLING, JR.
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Dated: August 8, 1985
WILLIAM E. BROCK, SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
EASTERN STEEL ERECTORS, INC.,
Respondent.
OSHRC DOCKET NO. 83-1107 (EAJA)
JOINT NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION
FOR FEES AND EXPENSES UNDER THE EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
Complainant, by his undersigned attorney, and respondent Eastern Steel Erectors, Inc., by
its undersigned attorney, hereby notify the Occupational Safety and Health Review
Commission ("Commission") that the above-noted proceeding presently before the
Commission on review of the decision of the administrative law judge on the issue of fees
and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. �504 ("EAJA"), has
been concluded by Stipulation and Settlement with respect to the pending claim in its
entirety. A copy of the Agreement entered into by the parties is attached hereto.
Accordingly, there being no controversy remaining between the parties, Eastern Steel
Erectors, Inc. withdraws its application under the EAJA and the instant proceedings are
terminated.
FOR THE COMPLAINANT
Mary N. Revell, Esq.
FOR THE RESPONDENT
Richard I. Manas, Esq.
DATED: August 5, 1985
WILLIAM E. BROCK, SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
EASTERN STEEL ERECTORS, INC.,
Respondent.
OSHRC DOCKET
No. 83-1107 (EAJA)
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Complainant, by his undersigned attorney, and respondent, Eastern Steel Erectors, Inc., by
its undersigned attorney, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
-
The parties wish to settle the application of respondent for attorney's fees and
expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. �504 (EAJA), without the need
for further litigation. -
Without conceding that respondent has any rights whatsoever to attorney's fees and
expenses under the EAJA in the instant proceeding, complainant agrees in settlement of
respondent's application to pay to respondent by check drawn from the United States
Department of Labor, the amount of $4,330.00. The check shall be made payable to Eastern
Steel Erectors, Inc., shall he issued to the above-named within ninety days of final.
execution of this agreement, and shall constitute full and complete settlement of
respondent's application. -
In consideration for the $4,330.00 check for attorney's fees and expenses described in
paragraph (2) above, respondent hereby agrees to waive all other claims for attorney's
fees and expenses incurred in this case both on the merits of the original citations and
on its application under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
FOR THE COMPLAINANT
Mary N. Revell, Esq.
FOR THE RESPONDENT
Richard I. Manas, Esq.
DATED: August 5, 1985
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1985. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.