🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
OSHRC Commission decision Docket 80-7355 Decided June 15, 1983 Settled

Hardaway Constructors, Inc.

Marine-construction item withdrawn

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1983, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1983
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Citation item 5 originally alleged a nonserious violation of section 1918.13(a) and was later amended to section 1926.605(a)(1), with no penalty proposed. The judge vacated the item, and the Secretary obtained discretionary review. In the settlement, the Secretary withdrew both the review petition and item 5, while the parties agreed to bear their own fees and expenses. The Commission approved the agreement.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1918.13(a), later amended to 29 C.F.R. § 1926.605(a)(1).
  • Outcome: Citation item 5 withdrawn; no penalty.
  • Key point: The Secretary ended review by withdrawing the sole remaining citation item, leaving the rest of the case resolved under the earlier partial settlement.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 80-7355

Secretary of Labor,

Complainant,

v.

Hardaway Constructors, Inc.,

Respondent

OSHRC Docket No. 80-7355

ORDER

The parties' Stipulation and Settlement Agreement is Approved.

For the Commission

Ray H. Darling, Jr.

Executive Secretary

Dated: JUN 15 1983

RAYMOND J. DONOVAN, SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v,

HARDAWAY CONSTRUCTORS, INC.,

Respondent.

OSHRC DOCKET No. 80-7355

STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

I

The parties hereby enter into this stipulation and settlement agreement as a full and
complete settlement of the instant case which is presently pending upon review before the
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

II

The parties stipulate as follows:

(A) The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (hereinafter "the
Commission) has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to section 10(c) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1590; 29 U.S.C. � 651 et seq.) (hereinafter
"the Act").

(B) Respondent, Hardaway Constructors, Inc., is a corporation with its office and
principal place of business located in Columbus, Georgia. It is engaged in the business of
construction and during the course of its business its employees are engaged in this
business. During the course of its business respondent uses equipment and material from
places located outside the State of Georgia. Respondent was and is an employer engaged in
a business affecting commerce within the meaning of sections 3(3) and 3(5) of the Act and
employed employees within the meaning of section 3(6) of the Act.

(C) As a result of an inspection conducted on October 17, 1980, at respondent's workplace
in Edgewater, Maryland, a citation item (item 5) for non-serious violation of 29 CFR
1918.13(a), later amended to allege a non-serious violation of 29 CPR 1926.605(a)(1),
among others, was issued to respondent on November 7, 1980, pursuant to section 9(a) of
the Act.

(D) On November 7, 1980, pursuant to section 10(a) of the Act, a notification of proposed
penalty recommending a no penalty for the alleged non-serious violation, among others, was
sent to respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested.

(E) By letter dated December 1, 1980, respondent timely contested the citations and the
penalties proposed therefor. Respondent's notice of contest was duly transmitted to the
Commission.

(F) On April 21, 1981, the parties submitted a partial settlement agreement for all
citation items, except item 5, and a stipulation with respect to item 5.

(G) In a decision filed on August 5, 1981, the administrative law judge vacated item 5.

(H) On June 2, 1981, the Secretary filed a petition for discretionary review and review
was directed.

III

Complainant hereby agrees to withdraw its petition for discretionary review and citation
item 5.

IV

The parties agree to bear their own expenses and attorney's fees.

V

Respondent has posted this stipulation and settlement agreement in accordance with
Commission Rule 7(g). There were no affected employees represented by an authorized
employee representative.

WHEREFORE, the parties request the Commission to approve this stipulation and settlement
agreement.

Signed this 31 day of May, 1983.

The Administrative Law Judge decision in this matter is unavailable in this format. To
obtain a copy of this document, please request one from our Public Information Office By
e-mail ( [email protected] ), telephone
(202-606-5398), fax (202-606-5050), or TTY (202-606-5386).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1983. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.