🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
OSHRC Commission decision Docket 79-6382 Decided March 2, 1984 Citations affirmed

Singer Co., American Meter Division

Secretary's review petition withdrawn

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1984, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1984
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The judge affirmed several serious violations, including two that the Secretary had alleged were willful. The Secretary obtained Commission review of whether those two violations should be characterized as willful, but later concluded that the record contained insufficient evidence of willfulness. The Commission allowed the Secretary to withdraw the review petition and vacated the direction for review. Commissioner Cleary dissented from the order.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): The official release does not identify the standards involved.
  • Outcome: Direction for review vacated, leaving the judge's serious-violation characterization in place.
  • Key point: The Commission terminated review after the Secretary concluded that the evidence could not support willful characterization.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 79-6382

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

SINGER CO., AMERICAN METER DIVISION

Respondent.

OSHRC DOCKET NO. 79-6382

ORDER

The Commission grants the Secretary's motion to withdraw his petition for
review and further vacates the direction for review.[[1/]]

FOR THE COMMISSION

RAY H. DARLING, JR.

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Dated:  MAR 2 1984

RAYMOND J. DONOVAN, SECRETARY OF LABOR

Complainant,

v.

SINGER CO., AMERICAN METER DIVISION,

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 79-6382

MOTION TO WITHDRAW PETITION FOR REVIEW

The complainant, Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of
Labor moves that the Commission permit the complainant to withdraw his petition for review
which was granted by former Commissioner Bertram R. Cottine.

As grounds for this motion, the Secretary sets forth the following facts:

1.  On September 2, 1980, Judge William E. Brennan affirmed serious
violations of several standards, two of which the Secretary had alleged to be willful
violations.  The Secretary petitioned for review concerning the characterization of
these two violations.  On October 3, 1980, former Commissioner Cottine directed
review on the issue whether the violations should have been characterized as willful.
  On January 17, 1983, the Commission ordered the Secretary to file his brief on the
issue.

2.  The Secretary has reviewed the transcript and record in the matter and has
determined that there is insufficient evidence in the record to support a finding of a
willful violation.  As a result of the new review and determination, the Secretary
respectfully requests that the Commission permit the Secretary to withdraw the petition.

Respectfully submitted,

FRANCIS X. LILLY

Deputy Solicitor of Labor

FRANK A. WHITE

Associate Solicitor for

Occupational Safety & Health

DANIEL J. MICK

Counsel for Regional

Trial Litigation

EUGENE LOPEZ

Attorney

The Administrative Law Judge decision in this matter is unavailable in this
format.  To obtain a copy of this document, please request one from our Public
Information Office by e-mail ( [email protected]
), telephone (202-606-5398), fax (202-606-5050), or TTY (202-606-5386).

FOOTNOTES:

[[1/]] Commissioner Cleary dissents to this order.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1984. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.