Singer Co., American Meter Division
Secretary's review petition withdrawn
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1984, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The judge affirmed several serious violations, including two that the Secretary had alleged were willful. The Secretary obtained Commission review of whether those two violations should be characterized as willful, but later concluded that the record contained insufficient evidence of willfulness. The Commission allowed the Secretary to withdraw the review petition and vacated the direction for review. Commissioner Cleary dissented from the order.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): The official release does not identify the standards involved.
- Outcome: Direction for review vacated, leaving the judge's serious-violation characterization in place.
- Key point: The Commission terminated review after the Secretary concluded that the evidence could not support willful characterization.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 79-6382
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
SINGER CO., AMERICAN METER DIVISION
Respondent.
OSHRC DOCKET NO. 79-6382
ORDER
The Commission grants the Secretary's motion to withdraw his petition for
review and further vacates the direction for review.[[1/]]
FOR THE COMMISSION
RAY H. DARLING, JR.
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Dated: MAR 2 1984
RAYMOND J. DONOVAN, SECRETARY OF LABOR
Complainant,
v.
SINGER CO., AMERICAN METER DIVISION,
Respondent.
OSHRC Docket No. 79-6382
MOTION TO WITHDRAW PETITION FOR REVIEW
The complainant, Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of
Labor moves that the Commission permit the complainant to withdraw his petition for review
which was granted by former Commissioner Bertram R. Cottine.
As grounds for this motion, the Secretary sets forth the following facts:
1. On September 2, 1980, Judge William E. Brennan affirmed serious
violations of several standards, two of which the Secretary had alleged to be willful
violations. The Secretary petitioned for review concerning the characterization of
these two violations. On October 3, 1980, former Commissioner Cottine directed
review on the issue whether the violations should have been characterized as willful.
On January 17, 1983, the Commission ordered the Secretary to file his brief on the
issue.
2. The Secretary has reviewed the transcript and record in the matter and has
determined that there is insufficient evidence in the record to support a finding of a
willful violation. As a result of the new review and determination, the Secretary
respectfully requests that the Commission permit the Secretary to withdraw the petition.
Respectfully submitted,
FRANCIS X. LILLY
Deputy Solicitor of Labor
FRANK A. WHITE
Associate Solicitor for
Occupational Safety & Health
DANIEL J. MICK
Counsel for Regional
Trial Litigation
EUGENE LOPEZ
Attorney
The Administrative Law Judge decision in this matter is unavailable in this
format. To obtain a copy of this document, please request one from our Public
Information Office by e-mail ( [email protected]
), telephone (202-606-5398), fax (202-606-5050), or TTY (202-606-5386).
FOOTNOTES:
[[1/]] Commissioner Cleary dissents to this order.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1984. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.