🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
OSHRC Commission decision Docket 78-2499 Decided July 31, 1980 Citations affirmed

Ladish Co. Tri-Clover Division

Post-1972 installations must comply with the full electrical code

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1980, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1980
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Ladish installed electrical equipment in 1976 without enough access and working space for safe operation and maintenance. It admitted that the condition violated section 110-16(a) of the 1971 National Electrical Code but disputed whether OSHA had incorporated that provision. The Commission held that 29 C.F.R. § 1910.309(b) incorporates the entire code for installations made after March 15, 1972. It affirmed the serious violation, and the stipulated penalty and abatement terms remained in effect.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1910.309(a); 29 C.F.R. § 1910.309(b)
  • Outcome: Serious electrical citation affirmed; stipulated penalty and abatement terms upheld
  • Key point: Section 1910.309(b) incorporates the entire 1971 National Electrical Code for covered work performed after March 15, 1972

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 78-2499

1 of 202 DOCUMENTS

TURNER COMPANY

A. SCHONBEK & CO., INC.

NORANDA ALUMINUM, INC.

GENERAL MOTORS CORP., GM ASSEMBLY DIV.

ALLIED PLANT MAINTENANCE CO. OF OKLAHOMA, INC.

CLEMENT FOOD COMPANY

MILLCON CORPORATION

FWA DRILLING COMPANY, INC.

CCI, INC.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED ALUMINUM CORPORATION

THE BRONZE CRAFT CORPORATION

CARGILL, INC.

CHAPMAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

GALLO MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.

SPECIAL METALS CORPORATION

WILLAMETTE IRON AND STEEL COMPANY

NASHUA CORPORATION

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION

RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC.

ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CO.

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CO.

BUNKOFF CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, FRIGIDAIRE DIVISION

HARRIS BROTHERS ROOFING CO.

GENERAL DIVERS COMPANY

ORMET CORPORATION

R. ZOPPO CO., INC.

COEUR D'ALENE TRIBAL FARM

L. A. DREYFUS COMPANY

CMH COMPANY, INC.

BENTON FOUNDRY, INC.

MICHAEL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

BROWN & ROOT, POWER PLANT DIVISION

MARION POWER SHOVEL CO., INC.

ERSKINE-FRASER CO.

MORRISON-KNUDSEN AND ASSOCIATES

THE BOAM COMPANY

DIC-UNDERHILL, a Joint Venture

C. R. BURNETT AND SONS, INC.; HARLLEE FARMS

STRIPE-A-ZONE, INC.

FORTE BROTHERS, INC.

RAYBESTOS FRICTION MATERIALS COMPANY

TEXLAND DRILLING CORPORATION

THE ANACONDA COMPANY, WIRE AND CABLE DIVISION

SAM HALL & SONS, INC.

VAMPCO METAL PRODUCTS, INC.

LEONE INDUSTRIES, INC.

ASARCO, INC.

DURANT ELEVATOR, A DIVISION OF SCOULAR-BISHOP GRAIN COMPANY

PLUM CREEK LUMBER COMPANY

PLUM CREEK LUMBER COMPANY

STEARNS-ROGER, INC.

FERRO CORPORATION, (ELECTRO DIVISION)

AMERICAN PACKAGE COMPANY, INC.

BROWN & ROOT, INC., POWER PLANT DIVISION

FLEETWOOD HOMES OF TEXAS, INC.

DONALD HARRIS, INC.

A. PROKOSCH & SONS SHEET METAL, INC.; MID-HUDSON AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY, INC.

ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTORS OF AMERICA, INC.

DAYTON TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY (Division of the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company)

ASARCO, INC., EL PASO DIVISION; HUGHES TOOL COMPANY

NAVAJO FOREST PRODUCTS INDUSTRIES

METROPAK CONTAINERS CORPORATION

AUSTIN BUILDING COMPANY

BABCOCK AND WILCOX COMPANY

DARRAGH COMPANY

BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY

OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY

R. ZOPPO COMPANY, INC.

LUTZ, DAILY & BRAIN - CONSULTING ENGINEERS

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.

HARSCO CORPORATION, d/b/a PLANT CITY STEEL COMPANY

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC.

INDEPENDENCE FOUNDRY & MANUFACTURING CO., INC.

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, INLAND DIVISION

WELDSHIP CORPORATION

S & S DIVING COMPANY

SNIDER INDUSTRIES, INC.

NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY

MAXWELL WIREBOUND BOX CO., INC.

CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY

MISSOURI FARMER'S ASSOCIATION, INC., MFA BOONVILLE EXCHANGE; MFA, INC., d/b/a MFA GRAIN DIVISION; DESERT GOLD FEED COMPANY

CAPITAL CITY EXCAVATING CO., INC.

GAF CORPORATION

PPG INDUSTRIES (CARIBE) a Corporation

DRUTH PACKAGING CORPORATION

SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

TUNNEL ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO.

WEATHERBY ENGINEERING COMPANY

JOHNSON STEEL & WIRE CO., INC.

AUSTIN ROAD CO.

MAYHEW STEEL PRODUCTS, INC.

LADISH CO., TRI-CLOVER DIVISION, a Corporation

OSHRC Docket No. 78-2499

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

July 31, 1980


[*1]

Before: CLEARY, Chairman; BARNAKO and COTTINE, Commissioners.

COUNSEL:

Baruch A. Fellner, Counsel for Regional Litigation, Office of the Solicitor, USDOL

Herman Grant, Regional Solicitor, USDOL

Peter C. Karegeannes, for the employer

OPINION:

DECISION

BY THE COMMISSION:

A decision of Administrative Law Judge Edward V. Alfieri is before the Commission for review pursuant to section 12(j) n1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. � �

651-678 ("the Act").

                                  • -Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

n1 29 U.S.C. �

661(i).

                                • -End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judge Alfieri affirmed a citation issued by the Secretary of Labor ("the Secretary") alleging that Respondent, Ladish Co., Tri-Clover Division, committed a serious violation of section 5(a)(2) of the Act n2 by failing to provide sufficient access and working space for certain electrical equipment with the result that safe operation and maintenance could not be performed. n3

                                  • -Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

n2 29 U.S.C. �

654(a)(2).

n3 The Secretary's amended complaint alleged that Respondent failed to comply with section 110-16(a) of the National Electrical Code, NFPA 70-1971, as adopted by 29 C.F.R. �

1910.309(b).

Section 1910.309(b) provides:



1910.309 National Electrical Code.


(b) Every new electrical installation and all new utilization equipment installed after March 15, 1972, and every replacement, modification, or repair or rehabilitation, after March 15, 1972, of any part of any electrical installation or utilization equipment installed before March 15, 1972, shall be installed or made, and maintained, in accordance with the provisions of the 1971 National Electrical Code, NFPA 70-1971; ANSI C1-1971 (Rev. of C1-1968).


[*2]

                                • -End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The parties entered into a stipulation of facts and submitted briefs to the judge addressing the sole issue of whether section 110-16(a) of the 1971 National Electrical Code ("NEC") is incorporated by reference into 29 C.F.R. �

1910.309(b).

Respondent stipulated that the cited condition was "contrary" to section 110-16(a).

Respondent further stipulated that, in the event that a violation is found, the proposed penalty and the abatement date are reasonable.

The judge concluded that section 1910.309(b) incorporates by reference the entire NEC.

The judge rejected Respondent's argument that only those sections of the NEC specified in 29 C.F.R. �

1910.309(a) n4 are incorporated and that section 1910.309(b) merely specifies the effective date.

Respondent's petition for review of the judge's ruling on this issue was granted by Commissioner Cottine.

                                  • -Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

n4 29 C.F.R. �

1910.309(a) provides in pertinent part:



1910.309 National Electrical Code.

(a) The requirements contained in the following articles and sections of the National Electrical Code, NFPA 70-1971; ANSI CI-1971 (Rev. of Cl-1968) shall apply to all electrical installations and utilization equipment:


The remainder of this section consists of a list of more than 30 articles and sections of the NEC.

Section 110-16(a) is not included in this list.


[*3]

                                • -End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

After the judge issued his decision, the Commission held that 29 C.F.R. �

1910.309(b) incorporates the entire NEC with respect to equipment installed, replaced, modified, repaired, or rehabilitated after March 15, 1972.

Delaware & Hudson Railway, 80 OSAHRC    , 8 BNA OSHC 1252, 1980 CCH OSHD P24,422 (No. 76-787, 1980).

The stipulation of the parties indicates that the electrical equipment at issue was installed during 1976.

Accordingly, the judge correctly interpreted and applied section 1910.309(b) and his finding of a violation based upon the applicability of section 110-16(a) of the NEC to the cited condition is affirmed.

SO ORDERED.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1980. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.