🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
OSHRC Commission decision Docket 17-0196 Decided December 20, 2018 Remanded

Ovation Plumbing, Inc.

Case remanded for settlement review

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2018, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2018
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

An administrative law judge had affirmed a fall-protection violation and assessed a $1,000 penalty, and that decision became a final Commission order. Ovation Plumbing petitioned the Tenth Circuit for review. The court granted the parties’ joint request for a limited remand so their settlement could be considered. The Commission returned the case to the judge to review the settlement agreement and any objections under Commission Rule 100.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1926.501(b)(1)
  • Outcome: Case remanded to the administrative law judge for review of the parties’ settlement.
  • Key point: A court-ordered limited remand allows the Commission’s judge to consider a settlement reached after the original final order.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Bailey, Ronald G.
Normal
OChair
7
14
2018-12-21T15:22:00Z
2018-12-21T15:23:00Z
2018-12-21T15:35:00Z
2
191
1091
9
2
1280
16.00

Print
Clean
Clean
false

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

United
States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION

1120
20 th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington,
DC � 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF
LABOR

����������������������������������������������� Complainant

����������������������������������� v.

OVATION PLUMBING,
INC.

����������������������������������������������� Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 17-0196

REMAND
ORDER

Before: �
MacDOUGALL ,
Chairman; ATTWOOD and SULLIVAN, Commissioners.

BY THE COMMISSION:

In an April 17, 2018
Decision and Order, Administrative Law Judge Brian A. Duncan affirmed a
violation of 29 C.F.R. � 1926.501(b)(1) and assessed a penalty of $1,000. � The decision became a final order of the
Commission on May 18, 2018. � Respondent subsequently
filed a petition for review with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth
Circuit. � On November 20, 2018, the court
issued an order granting the parties� Joint Motion for a Remand and remanding the
matter to the Commission �for the limited purpose of considering the parties�
settlement.� �

The Commission now remands
the matter to Administrative Law Judge Brian A. Duncan to review the settlement
agreement and consider any objections pursuant to Commission Rule 100, 29
C.F.R. � 2200.100.

SO
ORDERED.

/s/ ��������������������������������������������������������

Heather
L. MacDougall

Chairman ��������������������

/s/ ��������������������������������������������������������

Cynthia
L. Attwood

Commissioner

/s/ ��������������������������������������������������������

James
J. Sullivan, Jr.

Dated: December 20, 2018 ���������������������������������������� Commissioner

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2018. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.