🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
OSHRC Commission decision Docket 13225 Decided June 16, 1977 Citations affirmed

Congoleum Industries, Inc.

Commission affirms after the Secretary withdraws review

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1977, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1977
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Commission granted the Secretary of Labor's petition to review an administrative law judge's decision involving Congoleum Industries, Inc. The United Steelworkers local representing affected employees initially joined the Secretary's request. The Secretary later withdrew the petition, the employer stated that the judge's decision should be affirmed, and the employee representative made no further submission or objection. With no party pressing an objection, the Commission affirmed the judge's decision. This brief release does not identify the underlying citations, any specific safety standard, the judge's reasoning, or a penalty amount.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): No specific OSHA standard is identified in the Commission decision.
  • Outcome: Affirmed. The Commission affirmed the judge's decision after the Secretary withdrew review and no other party objected.
  • Key point: The Commission may affirm an administrative law judge's decision when the party seeking review withdraws and no remaining party presses an objection.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 13225

CONGOLEUM INDUSTRIES, INC.

OSHRC Docket No. 13225

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

June 16, 1977


[*1]

Before BARNAKO, Chairman and CLEARY, Commissioner.

COUNSEL:

Baruch A. Fellner, Office of the Solicitor, USDOL

Marshall H. Harris Reg. Sol., USDOL

Francis J. Connell, III, for the employer

A. E. Lawson & Franklin Mont, United Steelworkers of America, for the employees

OPINION:

DECISION

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter is before us by Commissioner Cleary's September 20, 1976 order granting a petition for discretionary review filed by complainant, the Secretary of Labor.

The petition included several exceptions to a decision issued on August 19, 1976, by Administrative Law Judge Ben D. Worcester.

The authorized employee representative, Local 12698, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, which had breviously asserted party status in the case, advised the Commission on the date of the direction for review that it joined in the Secretary's request for review.

On February 25, 1977, a notice of withdrawal of its petition was filed with the Commission by the Secretary and served upon respondent, Congoleum Industries, Inc., and the authorized employee representative.

Respondent has submitted a letter in which it presumes that the Judge's decision will be affirmed on the basis of the lack of party [*2]

objection.

The authorized employee representative has filed neither a submission on review nor a response to the Secretary's notice of withdrawal.

In these circumstances, the Judge's decision is affirmed.

Koppers Co., Inc. 5 BNA OSHC 1306, 1977-78 CCH OSHD para. 21,723 (No. 3449, 1977); Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Company, No. 6661 (May 6, 1977); Abbott-Sommer, Inc., 3 BNA OSHC 2032, 1975-76 CCH OSHD para. 20,248 (No. 9507, 1976).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1977. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.