🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
OSHRC Commission decision Docket 02-1140 Decided October 10, 2008 Remanded

StarTran, Inc.

Court's partial remand returned recordkeeping case for further proceedings

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2008, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2008
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Fifth Circuit reviewed the Commission's earlier decision affirming a StarTran citation under OSHA's recordkeeping-access rule. The court affirmed the Commission in part and remanded the case in part in an unpublished opinion. After receiving the court's mandate, the Commission remanded the matter for further proceedings consistent with that opinion. This short order does not describe which portion of the prior ruling required additional proceedings.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1904.40
  • Outcome: The Commission remanded the case for proceedings required by the Fifth Circuit's partial remand.
  • Key point: The Commission implemented the court's mandate without revisiting issues the court had already affirmed.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Startran, Inc., Docket No. 02-1140

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

STARTRAN, INC.,

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 02-1140

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION,
LOCAL 1091,

Authorized Employee

Representative.

APPEARANCES:

Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor; Joseph M. Woodward, Associate Solicitor; Alexander Fernández,
Deputy Associate Solicitor; Daniel J. Mick, Counsel for Regional Trial Litigation; Mark J.
Lerner, Attorney; U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC

For the Complainant

John J. Franco Jr., Esq.; Jeffrey C. Londa, Esq.; Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.,
San Antonio, TX

For the Respondent

Dr. William J. Kweder, Union Secretary; Joneth Wyatt, President; Amalgamated Transit Union,
Local 1091, Austin, TX

For Authorized Employee Representative

REMAND ORDER

Before: THOMPSON, Chairman; ROGERS, Commissioner.

BY THE COMMISSION:

This case is before the Commission on remand from the United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit. StarTran, Inc. v. Chao , 22 BNA OSHC 1283 (5th Cir. 2008) (unpublished
opinion). On appeal, the court reviewed the decision by the Commission to affirm a citation
alleging a violation of 29 C.F.R. §1904.40. StarTran, Inc. , 21 BNA OSHC 1730 (No. 02-1140,
2006). In an unpublished opinion dated August 11, 2008, the court affirmed the Commission’s
decision in part and remanded in part.

By mandate dated October 3, 2008, the court has remanded the case to the Commission.
We, in turn, remand this case for further proceedings consistent with the court’s opinion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

Horace A. Thompson III

Chairman

/s/_________

Thomasina V. Rogers

Dated:   October 10, 2008                                            Commissioner

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2008. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.