🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX KP-0335 October 20, 2020

Are a Texas search warrant, its return, and the property inventory public records the district clerk must release during an open investigation?

Short answer: The AG concluded that these documents are not covered by the Public Information Act, because a district clerk holds them on behalf of the judiciary, which the Act expressly excludes. Access is instead governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure. Working through that code, the AG explained that the Legislature said an affidavit supporting a search warrant becomes public when the warrant is executed, but did not directly address the warrant itself, the return, or the inventory, the way it expressly made arrest warrants public. The decisive provision was article 18.011(d)(1): even when a magistrate temporarily seals a search warrant affidavit, that order 'may not . . . prohibit the disclosure of information relating to the contents of a search warrant, the return of a search warrant, or the inventory of property taken pursuant to a search warrant.' Reading the statute as a whole, the AG concluded a court would likely find a search warrant, its return, and the property inventory subject to public disclosure by a district clerk, and the ongoing-investigation circumstance did not change that result.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2020. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2020
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority in Texas courts but are not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Statutes can be amended; verify current law before relying on anything here. Consult a licensed attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

After the Rusk Police Department executed a search warrant on a residence as part of an ongoing investigation, a local attorney went to the district clerk's office and asked for the supporting affidavit, the warrant itself, and the return and inventory. The clerk released the affidavit, which a statute makes public once the warrant is executed, but was unsure about the rest. The Cherokee County District Attorney asked the Attorney General whether the warrant, the return, and the inventory had to be disclosed, especially with the investigation still open.

The AG started by clearing up which law applies. People often assume the Public Information Act governs any record a government office holds, but the Act expressly excludes the judiciary, and a district clerk holds court case records, including search warrant materials, on behalf of the courts. So the Act did not control. Access to judicial records is instead governed by Texas Supreme Court rules, and those rules (Rule of Judicial Administration 12.3 and 12.4) route search-warrant records to "other applicable law," which sent the AG to the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Chapter 18 of that code lays out the search warrant process. It says the sworn affidavit supporting a warrant generally becomes public information when the warrant is executed, but it does not directly spell out a public right to the warrant itself, the return, or the inventory, the way the Legislature expressly made arrest warrants public in article 15.26. The AG noted that legislative silence is usually treated as intentional. But the code did not leave the question open: article 18.011(d)(1), which lets a magistrate temporarily seal a search warrant affidavit, says such a sealing order "may not . . . prohibit the disclosure of information relating to the contents of a search warrant, the return of a search warrant, or the inventory of property taken pursuant to a search warrant." Reading the statute as a whole and giving effect to every provision, the AG concluded that this language made the point clear: a court would likely hold that a search warrant, its return, and the property inventory are subject to public disclosure by a district clerk. The fact that the underlying investigation was ongoing did not change that conclusion.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2020. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. The cited provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Government Code, and the Rules of Judicial Administration can be amended, so verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.

What the opinion meant for those who asked

The opinion answered a working question for a district attorney advising a district clerk who had a records request in hand. For the district clerk, the takeaway was that the Public Information Act and its exceptions were the wrong framework, because the clerk held these documents for the judiciary; the right framework was the Code of Criminal Procedure, and under article 18.011(d)(1) the warrant, return, and inventory were the kind of records a court would likely treat as open to the public. For prosecutors and law enforcement, the opinion signaled that an ongoing investigation alone did not shield those particular documents from disclosure, though the supporting affidavit could be temporarily sealed by a magistrate. For a member of the public or an attorney seeking the records, it meant the request belonged under the criminal-procedure rules rather than a Public Information Act request to the clerk.

Common questions

Q: Does the Public Information Act apply to search warrant records held by a district clerk?
A: No. The AG explained that the Act excludes the judiciary, and a district clerk holds search warrant records on behalf of the courts, so access is governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure and Texas Supreme Court rules instead.

Q: Are the search warrant, return, and inventory public?
A: The AG concluded a court would likely find them subject to public disclosure by a district clerk, based on the language of Code of Criminal Procedure article 18.011(d)(1).

Q: Does an ongoing criminal investigation keep these documents secret?
A: Not by itself, under this analysis. The AG concluded the documents would likely be subject to disclosure even with an investigation ongoing. A magistrate can, however, temporarily seal the supporting affidavit.

Q: What about the affidavit supporting the warrant?
A: A separate provision, article 18.01(b), makes the supporting affidavit public when the warrant is executed, though article 18.011 lets a magistrate temporarily seal it under certain conditions.

Background and statutory framework

The opinion sorts out a layered access question. A district clerk holds court records, including search warrant materials, for the judiciary (Government Code section 51.303(b); Code of Criminal Procedure article 2.21(a)). The Public Information Act defines a governmental body to exclude the judiciary (Government Code sections 552.002(a)(1) and 552.003(1)(B)(i)) and routes access to judicial records to Supreme Court rules (section 552.0035(a)), a point the AG had recognized in ORD-671 (2001). The Supreme Court's Rule of Judicial Administration 12.4 generally opens judicial records, but Rule 12.3(c) carves out search-warrant records and sends them to other law. That other law is chapter 18 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which defines the warrant (article 18.01(a)), makes the supporting affidavit public on execution (article 18.01(b)), requires an inventory and return (articles 18.06(b) and 18.10), and, in article 18.011(d)(1), forbids a sealing order from blocking disclosure of the warrant's contents, the return, or the inventory. The AG contrasted this with article 15.26, where the Legislature expressly made arrest warrants public, and applied standard construction principles from Shinogle v. Whitlock, TIC Energy & Chem., Inc. v. Martin, and Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Adcock to read the provisions together.

Citations and references

Statutory and rule provisions:

Cases:

  • Shinogle v. Whitlock, 596 S.W.3d 772 (Tex. 2020)
  • TIC Energy & Chem., Inc. v. Martin, 498 S.W.3d 68 (Tex. 2016)
  • Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Adcock, 412 S.W.3d 492 (Tex. 2013)

Related opinion:

  • Tex. Att'y Gen. ORD-671 (2001) (records a district clerk collects under section 51.303(b) are maintained for the judiciary and are not public information under the Act)

Source

Original opinion text

KEN PAXTON
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

October 20, 2020

The Honorable Elmer C. Beckworth, Jr.
Cherokee County District Attorney
Post Office Box 450
Rusk, Texas 75785

Opinion No. KP-0335

Re: Whether a search warrant and "warrant return" are subject to disclosure under the Public Information Act, or any other law or regulation of the State of Texas, when there is an ongoing criminal investigation (RQ-0344-KP)

Dear Mr. Beckworth:

You tell us the Rusk Police Department recently executed a search warrant on a residence in connection with an ongoing criminal investigation.1 Subsequently, a local attorney requested from the district clerk's office "a copy of the supporting affidavit for the . . . warrant as well as the search warrant itself, and a copy of the return and inventory." Request Letter at 2. The district clerk released the supporting affidavit pursuant to article 18.01(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure but asked your office to seek clarification on whether the law requires disclosure of the warrant itself, the warrant return, and the inventory under the circumstances.2 Id. Accordingly, you ask whether specific provisions of the Public Information Act or any other state law or regulation subject a search warrant and warrant return to disclosure in the face of an ongoing criminal investigation. Id. at 1.

We note at the outset that the context for your question involves search warrants and related documents in the possession of a district clerk. A district clerk holds court case records on behalf of the courts served by the clerk. See TEX. GOV'T CODE § 51.303(b) (directing the clerk, among other duties, to record "the acts and proceedings of the court" and the "executions issued and the returns on the executions"); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 2.21(a) (providing that in a criminal proceeding the clerk of the district court shall "receive and file all papers" and "issue all process" of the court, among other responsibilities). As such, the district clerk holds a search warrant, warrant return, and related inventory list on behalf of the judiciary. The Public Information Act, about which you primarily ask, expressly excludes the judiciary. See TEX. GOV'T CODE §§ 552.002(a)(1) (defining the public information to which it applies as that which is "written, produced, collected, assembled, or maintained under a law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business . . . by a governmental body" (emphasis added)), 552.003(1)(B)(i) (providing that for purposes of the Act, a governmental body "does not include . . . the judiciary"); see also Tex. Att'y Gen. ORD-671 (2001) at 2-3 (noting the information a district clerk collects pursuant to Government Code section 51.303(b) is "collected, assembled, or maintained for the judiciary and is not public information under the Act"). The Public Information Act states that "[a]ccess to information collected, assembled, or maintained by or for the judiciary is governed by rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Texas or by other applicable laws and rules." TEX. GOV'T CODE § 552.0035(a).

The Texas Supreme Court adopted Rule of Judicial Administration 12.4, which generally makes judicial records open to the public for inspection and copying. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 12.4(a), reprinted in TEX. GOV'T CODE, tit. 2, subtit. F app. However, this general right does not apply to judicial records "covered by Rule[] 12.3," which includes "records or information relating to [a] . . . search warrant." Id. 12.4(a), 12.3(c). Instead, "access to [such records or information] is controlled by . . . state or federal court rule, including a rule of civil or criminal procedure, appellate procedure or evidence[,] or . . . common law, court order, judicial decision, or another provision of law." Id. 12.3(c). Accordingly, we consider your question in the context of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Chapter 18 of that code governs the search warrant process. See generally TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. arts. 18.01-.24. "A 'search warrant' is a written order, issued by a magistrate and directed to a peace officer, commanding him to search for any property or thing and to seize the same and bring it before such magistrate . . . ." Id. art. 18.01(a); see also id. art. 18.04 (listing the requisites for a sufficient warrant). An applicant for a search warrant must file a sworn affidavit setting forth substantial facts establishing probable cause to the magistrate's satisfaction before the warrant may issue. Id. art. 18.01(b). "On searching the place . . . the officer executing the warrant shall present a copy of the warrant to the owner" or the person in possession of the place, if they are present. Id. art. 18.06(b). Before taking any property, the officer must "prepare a written inventory" of it, endorse it with his name, and give it to the owner or possessor. Id. If neither the owner nor the possessor is present when the warrant is executed, the officer must "leave a copy of the warrant and the inventory at the place." Id. When the officer returns the search warrant to the magistrate, the officer must "state on the back of the same, or on some paper attached to it, the manner in which the warrant" was executed and "also deliver to the magistrate a copy of the inventory of the property taken." Id. art. 18.10. Other than the entitlement of the owner or possessor of the place searched to a copy of the warrant and written inventory, the Legislature did not directly address what right anyone else might have to those particular documents, or to the warrant return the officer delivers to the magistrate. Instead, chapter 18 provides only that the sworn affidavit supporting a search warrant generally becomes "public information when the search warrant for which the affidavit was presented is executed." Id. art. 18.01(b).

A court's "primary goal in construing a statute is to give effect to the Legislature's intent." Shinogle v. Whitlock, 596 S.W.3d 772, 776 (Tex. 2020). A court "must always consider the statute as a whole rather than its isolated provisions" and "not give one provision a meaning out of harmony or inconsistent with other provisions, although it might be susceptible to such a construction standing alone." Id. at 776-77. But in considering the statute as a whole, a court must also give "effect to each provision so that none is rendered meaningless or mere surplusage." TIC Energy & Chem., Inc. v. Martin, 498 S.W.3d 68, 74 (Tex. 2016). In article 18.01(b), the Legislature addressed the public nature of an affidavit supporting a search warrant but not the warrant itself, the return, or the inventory. By contrast, in the related context of arrest warrants, the Legislature expressly included the warrants themselves in its declaration of the "public information" to which a magistrate must provide access when the arrest warrant is executed. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 15.26 ("The arrest warrant, and any affidavit presented to the magistrate in support . . . is public information . . . ." (emphasis added)). Ordinarily, "[w]hen the Legislature expresses its intent regarding a subject in one setting, but . . . remains silent on that subject in another, [a court] generally abide[s] by the rule that such silence is intentional." Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Adcock, 412 S.W.3d 492, 497 (Tex. 2013). However, the Legislature provided a mechanism for a magistrate to temporarily seal a search warrant affidavit, in which it stated that an order to block disclosure of the affidavit to the public "may not . . . prohibit the disclosure of information relating to the contents of a search warrant, the return of a search warrant, or the inventory of property taken pursuant to a search warrant." TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 18.011(d)(1). Thus, while not expressing its intent regarding the status of a search warrant in the same way as for an arrest warrant, the Legislature could not have been more clear that the contents of the search warrant, warrant return, or inventory may not be blocked. Id. Given this express language in article 18.011(d)(1), a court would likely conclude that a search warrant, warrant return, and property inventory are subject to public disclosure by a district clerk.


1 See Letter from Honorable Elmer C. Beckworth, Jr., Cherokee Cty. Dist. Att'y, to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen. at 2 (Apr. 1, 2020), https://www2.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/opinions/51paxton/rq/2020/pdf/RQ0344KP.pdf ("Request Letter").

2 Article 18.01(b) directs a magistrate's clerk to make a copy of the supporting affidavit available for public inspection "when the search warrant for which the affidavit was presented is executed." TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 18.01(b).

S U M M A R Y

The Public Information Act does not apply to a district clerk holding a search warrant, warrant return, and property inventory on behalf of the judiciary. Instead, the Code of Criminal Procedure governs public access to such documents.

Based on language in Code of Criminal Procedure article 18.011(d)(1) that a court order temporarily sealing a search warrant affidavit "may not . . . prohibit the disclosure of information relating to the contents of a search warrant, the return of a search warrant, or the inventory of property taken pursuant to a search warrant," a court would likely conclude that such documents are subject to public disclosure by a district clerk.

Very truly yours,

KEN PAXTON
Attorney General of Texas

BRENT E. WEBSTER
First Assistant Attorney General

RYAN L. BANGERT
Deputy First Assistant Attorney General

RYAN M. VASSAR
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
Chair, Opinion Committee

BECKY P. CASARES
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2020 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.