When could the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse inspect treatment facilities, and when did another inspection or national hospital accreditation replace its inspection?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.
TX AG Opinion JM-652: When could the Commission inspect alcohol-treatment facilities?
Plain-English summary
The Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse asked a series of questions about on-site inspections of alcohol-treatment facilities and hospitals.
Article 4437h required state health agencies to avoid duplicate procedures. The opinion said §3 did not broadly prohibit Commission inspections. It required the Commission to accept another agency's inspection only when that inspection substantially complied with the Commission's own requirements. Whether two inspection systems substantially complied was a fact question that the opinion process could not decide.
Section 4 created a separate rule for qualifying hospitals. The opinion read it to prohibit additional licensing inspections of specified nationally accredited hospitals licensed by the Commission, even when the accreditation standards did not specifically address alcohol or drug treatment and even when the hospital was not certified under Title XVIII. The rule applied only to hospitals, not every kind of alcohol-treatment facility.
Article 5561cc, §7 authorized the Commission to adopt inspection criteria addressing organizational structure, programs, records, physical plants, and other treatment matters necessary to protect clients. Any inspection rule had to remain within that delegated authority.
Finally, the Department of Health's coordinating authority under §4(c) extended only to hospitals governed by §4. For other facilities, each affected agency had equal authority and responsibility under §3 to coordinate inspections; no agency was preeminent.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1987 under former health-facility statutes and agency names. Licensing systems, accreditation consequences, Medicare references, and interagency responsibilities may have changed. Treat this page as historical context and verify current facility-specific requirements.
What the opinion said for affected groups in 1987
Alcohol-treatment facilities
Facilities could be inspected by the Commission unless an inspection from another agency substantially complied with the Commission's requirements or the hospital-specific §4 exception applied.
Nationally accredited hospitals
Qualifying hospitals were protected from additional Commission licensing inspections even if the accreditor did not apply alcohol- or drug-specific program standards.
The Commission
It could define inspection criteria by rule within the subjects authorized by article 5561cc, §7 and had an equal duty to coordinate nonhospital inspections with other agencies.
The Department of Health
Its special coordination authority under §4(c) was limited to hospitals covered by §4 and did not make it preeminent for other treatment facilities.
Common questions
Did any prior state inspection bar a Commission inspection?
No. The prior inspection had to substantially comply with the Commission's requirements.
Who decided whether inspections substantially complied?
That was a factual issue; the opinion did not resolve it for any particular facility.
Did the nationally accredited hospital exception require Title XVIII certification in every case?
No. The opinion read the statutory alternatives separately and concluded that qualifying Commission-licensed, nationally accredited hospitals were covered without Title XVIII certification.
Could the Commission invent any inspection criterion it considered useful?
No. Its rules had to comport with the authority conferred by article 5561cc, §7.
Background and legal framework
Article 4437h governed coordination among several health-related state agencies. Section 3 required only necessary inspections, acceptance of substantially equivalent inspections, and internal and interagency coordination.
Article 5561cc separately authorized the Commission to license alcohol-treatment facilities, required approval following an on-site inspection, defined the covered facilities, and authorized reasonable entry for necessary inspections subject to article 4437h.
Section 4 of article 4437h protected specified hospitals from additional licensing inspections while certification or accreditation remained in force. It also required memoranda of understanding concerning certification and payment programs and assigned limited coordinating duties to the Department of Health.
Board of Insurance Commissioners and Blount supplied the delegated-authority principle used to limit Commission inspection rules to the subjects authorized by the Legislature.
Citations and references
Statutory provisions:
- V.T.C.S. art. 4437h, §§1, 3, and 4, inspection coordination and hospital exception
- V.T.C.S. art. 5561cc, §§1, 4, 6, and 7, treatment-facility definition, licensing, inspections, and rules
- V.T.C.S. art. 5561c-2, §§1.13 and 1.14, Commission authority discussed by the opinion
- 42 U.S.C. §§1395 et seq., Title XVIII reference
Cases:
- Board of Insurance Commissioners v. Guardian Life Insurance Co., 180 S.W.2d 906 (Tex. 1944), delegated rulemaking authority
- Blount v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 677 S.W.2d 565 (Tex. App. - Austin 1984), rev'd on other grounds sub nom., Employees Retirement System of Texas v. Blount, 709 S.W.2d 646 (Tex. 1986), delegated rulemaking authority
Source
- Landing page: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/jim-mattox/jm-0652
- Original PDF: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1987/jm0652.pdf
Original opinion text
Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain — the linked PDF is authoritative.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF TEXAS
JIM MATTOX
ATTORNEY GENERAL
March 23, 1987
Mr. Ross Newby Opinion No. JM-652
Executive Director
Texas Commission on Alcohol Re: Whether the Texas Commission
and Drug Abuse on Alcohol and Drug Abuse may
1705 Guadalupe conduct on-site inspections of
Austin, Texas 78701 alcohol treatment facilities and
related questions
Dear Mr. Newby:
You ask a series of questions regarding the authority of the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse [hereinafter the Commission] to conduct on-site inspections of alcohol treatment facilities. We will answer each of your questions in turn.
Article 4437h, V.T.C.S., imposes upon those state agencies, specifically the Texas Department of Health, the Texas Department of Human Resources, the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, and the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, that perform surveys, inspections, and investigations of "health care facilities" as defined by the Texas Health Planning and Development Act, article 4418h, V.T.C.S., the duty to "not duplicate their procedures or subject such health care facilities to duplicitous [sic] rules and regulations." V.T.C.S. art. 4437h, §1. Section 3 of the act provides the following:
Sec. 3. State agencies shall make or cause to be made only such inspections necessary to carry out the various obligations imposed on each agency by applicable state and federal law and regulations. Any on-site inspection by a state agency or a division or unit thereof that substantially complies with the inspection requirements of any other state agency or any other division or unit of the inspecting agency charged with making similar inspections shall be accepted as an equivalent inspection in lieu of an on-site inspection by said agency or by a division or unit of the inspecting agency. A state agency shall coordinate its health care facility inspections both internally and with those required by other state agencies so as to insure that the requirements of this section are met. (Emphasis added).
V.T.C.S. art. 4437h, §3.
Article 5561cc, V.T.C.S., confers on the commission the specific authority to regulate alcohol treatment facilities and provides at section 4 that
[t]he commission shall issue a license to a person who has: (1) complied with the license application requirements in Section 3 of this Act; and (2) received approval of the facility after an on-site inspection. (Emphasis added).
See also V.T.C.S. art. 5561c-2, §1.14(a)(9). Section 1(10) of article 5561cc, V.T.C.S., specifies that
'Alcohol treatment facility' means a public or private hospital, clinic, detoxification facility, primary care facility, intermediate care facility, long-term care or outpatient care facility, community mental health center, recovery center, halfway house, ambulatory care facility, or any other facility that purports to provide alcohol or combined alcohol and drug treatment services and rehabilitation services as one of its programs. The term does not include an educational program for intoxicated drivers or the office of a private licensed health care practitioner.
Section 6 specifically authorizes the commission to conduct on-site inspections and sets forth the following:
Sec. 6. (a) The commission or its authorized representative may enter upon the premises of a facility at reasonable times to make an inspection the commission considers necessary. The inspection is subject to the limitations imposed under Chapter 387, Acts of the 65th Legislature, Regular Session, 1977 (Article 4437h, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes).
(b) If the applicant or licensee is a health care facility as defined by Chapter 387, Acts of the 65th Legislature, Regular Session, 1977, (Article 4437h, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), on-site inspections by the commission must comply with the provisions of that Act. In cases in which an applicant or licensee is not covered by that Act, the commission may enter into interagency agreements to avoid duplication of efforts and to conserve state resources in relation to its on-site inspections under this Act. (Emphasis added).
V.T.C.S. art. 5561cc, §6.
You first ask the following question:
Does article 4437h, section 3, V.T.C.S., prohibit the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse from conducting on-site inspections of alcohol treatment facilities (as defined in article 5561cc, V.T.C.S.) for compliance with programmatic licensure standards which do not duplicate any standards required by another state agency?
We answer your first question in the negative. The very terms of section 3 of article 4437h provide that one state agency must accept the on-site inspection of another state agency only if the inspection requirements of the inspecting agency comply substantially with those of the first:
Any on-site inspection by a state agency or a division or unit thereof that substantially complies with the inspection requirements of any other state agency or any other division or unit of the inspecting agency charged with making similar inspections shall be accepted as an equivalent inspection in lieu of an on-site inspection by said agency or by a division or unit of the inspecting agency.
The issue as to whether the inspection requirements of one agency "substantially comply" with that of another is an issue of fact that would be inappropriate for resolution in the opinion process; but it is clear that the commission is precluded from conducting on-site inspections by section 3 of article 4437h only in such an instance.
You next ask:
Does article 4437h, section 4, V.T.C.S., prohibit the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse from conducting any and all on-site inspections of JCAH [Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals] or American Osteopathic Association -- accredited (or accreditations by other national accreditation bodies) hospitals which are certified under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, as amended, even if the hospital programs include an alcohol or drug treatment and rehabilitation program and the accrediting body does not apply alcohol/drug abuse content -- specific program standards? Do the provisions of section 4 prohibit the commission from conducting on-site programmatic inspections and separate licensure by the commission of JCAH -- accredited hospitals which are not certified under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act?
Section 4 of article 4437h, V.T.C.S., provides the following:
Sec. 4. (a) All hospitals licensed by the Texas Department of Health which have been certified under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, as added July 30, 1965 (Public Law 89-97), by the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, or by the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse which have obtained accreditation from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, the American Osteopathic Association, or another national accreditation body for the offered services, shall not be subject to additional licensing inspections under the Texas Hospital Licensing Law (Article 4437f, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) or by the licensing agency so long as such certification or accreditation is maintained. Such hospitals shall only be required to annually remit any applicable fees and submit a copy of the most recent survey results or inspection results report from the accreditation body in order to be issued a license by the appropriate licensing agency.
(b) The Texas Department of Human Resources, the Texas Department of Health, the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, and the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse shall execute a memorandum of understanding that establishes procedures to eliminate or reduce duplication of functions in certifying or licensing hospitals, nursing homes, or other facilities under their jurisdiction for payments under the requirements of the Medical Assistance Program (Chapter 32, Human Resources Code) and federal laws and regulations relating to Titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act. Each agency by rule shall adopt the memorandum of understanding. The procedures established under this section shall provide for use by the affected agencies of information collected by those agencies in making inspections for certification purposes and in investigating complaints regarding matters that would affect the certification of a nursing home or other facilities under their jurisdiction.
(c) The Texas Department of Health shall coordinate all licensing or certification procedures conducted by the state health-related organizations covered by this section.
(d) This section does not affect the authority of the Texas Department of Health to implement and enforce the provisions of the Texas Hospital Licensing Law (Article 4437f, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) relating to the transfer of hospital patients or the means by which the department implements and enforces those provisions. (Footnotes omitted). (Emphasis added).
It is important to note at the outset that section 4 applies only to hospitals. As we noted earlier, article 5561cc, V.T.C.S., reposes in the commission the responsibility to license "alcohol treatment facilities" as defined in section 1, subsection (10) of the act. The definition comprises more than "hospitals," and to the extent that it does, it falls without the reach of section 4 of article 4437h. In effect, section 4 serves as an exception to other relevant inspection and licensing requirements. The section provides that, as long as the specified certification or accreditation is maintained, a hospital shall not be subject to additional licensing inspections under either the Texas Hospital Licensing Law (article 4437h, V.T.C.S.) or by the relevant state licensing agency in three situations: (1) if the hospital is licensed by the Texas Department of Health and has been certified under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§1395 et seq.); (2) if the hospital is licensed by the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation; or (3) if the hospital is licensed by the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse and has obtained accreditation from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals [hereinafter JCAH], the American Osteopathic Association, or another national accreditation body for the offered services.
You ask whether section 4 of article 4437h, V.T.C.S., acts to prohibit the commission from conducting on-site inspections of hospitals accredited by national organizations in the manner specified in the third situation described above even if the hospital offers a drug or alcohol treatment program and the accrediting agency does not impose accrediting standards relevant to such programs. By the very terms of section 4, the answer is clearly "yes." You also ask whether the commission is prohibited from inspecting nationally accredited hospitals that are not certified under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act. And again, by the very terms of section 4 the answer is clearly "yes." We construe the phrase of section 4 that refers to national accreditation (i.e., "which have obtained . . . for the offered services") to affect only those hospitals licensed by the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, not to affect hospitals licensed by either the Texas Department of Health or the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation.
You next ask:
By what criteria must the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse conduct inspections which are mandated by article 5561cc, sections 6 and 13, and by article 5561c-2, sections 1.13 and 1.14(6) and (9), V.T.C.S., pursuant to section 4 of article 4437h?
Section 7 of article 5561cc, V.T.C.S., confers broad rule-making authority to the commission and provides the following:
Sec. 7. The commission shall adopt rules and standards for the following:
(1) the organizational structure of an alcohol treatment facility, including the governing authority of the facility, board authority, organization, fiscal and policy responsibilities, supervisory lines of authority, and staffing;
(2) the program conducted by a facility, including services to be provided, admission criteria, client rights, and standards for medication, nutrition, and emergency situations;
(3) the clinical and fiscal records kept by a facility;
(4) the general physical plant requirements for a facility, including environmental considerations, fire protection, safety, and other conditions to ensure the health and comfort of the clients; and
(5) standards relating to other aspects of alcohol or alcohol and drug abuse treatment as necessary to protect the alcoholic or alcohol and drug dependent person.
(b) The commission may not adopt rules restricting competitive bidding or advertising by a facility regulated by the commission except to prohibit false, misleading, or deceptive practices by the facility. The commission may not include in its rules to prohibit false, misleading, or deceptive practices by a facility regulated by the commission a rule that:
(1) restricts the facility's use of any medium for advertising;
(2) restricts in an advertisement the personal appearance of a person representing the facility or the use of that person's voice;
(3) relates to the size or duration of an advertisement by the facility; or
(4) restricts the facility's advertisement under a trade name.
The legislature has delegated to the commission the implied authority to formulate criteria to conduct on-site inspections prior to granting licenses, criteria that may not exceed the authority conferred by section 7 of article 5561cc, V.T.C.S. Board of Insurance Commissioners v. Guardian Life Insurance Co., 180 S.W.2d 906 (Tex. 1944); Blount v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 677 S.W.2d 565 (Tex. App. - Austin 1984), rev'd on other grounds sub nom., Employees Retirement System of Texas v. Blount, 709 S.W.2d 646 (Tex. 1986). You have included with your request a copy of rules promulgated by the commission pursuant to section 7 that govern licensing procedures and the denial, non-renewal or revocation of a license. You do not ask about, nor accordingly do we address, any specific rule or portion of a rule. We note only that any rule promulgated by the commission must comport with section 7.
Finally, you ask:
Does article 4437h, section 4(c), give the Texas Department of Health authority to coordinate licensing or certification procedures or Memoranda of Agreements between the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse and the Texas Department of Human Services with respect to Commission-licensed programs which provide alcohol and drug treatment and rehabilitation services (as defined in article 5561cc, V.T.C.S.) to juveniles?
The answer is clearly "no," at least with regard to facilities that are not hospitals which fall under section 4. Subsection (c) of section 4 of article 4437h, V.T.C.S., provides that
[t]he Texas Department of Health shall coordinate all licensing or certification procedures conducted by the state health-related organizations covered by this section. (Emphasis added).
This section, as noted above, serves as an exception to the other relevant inspection and licensing requirements set forth in articles 4437h, 5561cc, and 5561c-2, V.T.C.S. The coordinating authority of the Texas Department of Health extends only to those situations in which a section 4 "hospital" is involved. In all remaining instances, the last sentence of section 3 of article 4437h, V.T.C.S., controls:
A state agency shall coordinate its health care facility inspections both internally and with those required by other state agencies so as to insure that the requirements of this section are met.
It is clear that, with the exception of section 4 "hospitals," each agency affected by section 3 of article 4437h has both equal authority and equal responsibility to coordinate its health care facility inspections with other affected agencies; no agency's authority to coordinate inspections in this matter is preeminent over any other.
SUMMARY
Section 3 of article 4437h, V.T.C.S., does not prohibit the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse from conducting on-site inspections of alcohol-treatment facilities for compliance with licensure requirements except in an instance in which another licensing agency has already conducted such an inspection that substantially complies with that conducted by the commission. The issue as to whether the inspection requirements of one agency substantially comply with those of the commission is an issue of fact that would be inapposite for resolution in the opinion process. Section 4 of article 4437h, V.T.C.S., acts to prohibit the commission from conducting on-site inspections of hospitals accredited by national organizations in the manner specified in section 4, regardless of whether such hospitals are certified under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, even if the section 4 "hospital" offers a drug or alcohol treatment program and the accrediting agency does not impose accrediting standards relevant to such programs. The legislature has conferred authority to the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse to promulgate criteria by means of which the commission will conduct on-site licensure inspections; any such criteria promulgated by the commission must comport with the powers conferred by section 7 of article 5561cc, V.T.C.S. Subsection (c) of section 4 of article 4437h, V.T.C.S., confers authority to the Texas Department of Health to coordinate all licensing and certification procedures conducted by state health-related organizations only with regard to hospitals governed by section 4 of article 4437h. In all remaining instances, each agency affected by section 3 of article 4437h, V.T.C.S., has both equal authority and equal responsibility to coordinate its health care facility inspections with other affected agencies; no agency's authority to coordinate inspections is preeminent over any other.
Very truly yours,
JIM MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
JACK HIGHTOWER
First Assistant Attorney General
MARY KELLER
Executive Assistant Attorney General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Jim Moellinger
Assistant Attorney General
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1987 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.