🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX JM-370 October 25, 1985

Did a nonresident graduate student's job have to be titled 'teaching assistant' or 'research assistant' to qualify for Texas resident tuition?

Short answer: No. The Attorney General concluded that section 54.063 described academic job duties, not formal payroll titles. A half-time student employee qualified when the position involved teaching or research functions related to the student's degree program; auxiliary and other nonacademic jobs did not qualify.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1985
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority in Texas courts but are not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. The opinion dates from 1985; verify current statutes and case law before relying on it.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Texas AG Opinion JM-370: Assistant Duties Control Tuition

Plain-English summary

House Bill 1147 narrowed a nonresident-tuition waiver that had formerly covered teaching assistants, research assistants, and other student employees. The amended Education Code section 54.063 kept only teaching assistants and research assistants. The question was whether those words required universities to use those exact job titles. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

The Attorney General concluded that the terms described job functions rather than formal titles. Texas institutions used many different titles for student employees, and the legislature's purpose was to retain the waiver for academic assistants who brought scholarly value to the institution while eliminating the broader waiver for other employees. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

The waiver applied to student assistants with academic duties in any university teaching or research program when they worked at least half time in a position related to their degree program under institutional rules. It did not apply to students working in auxiliary enterprises or other nonacademic university activities. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1985. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Did the university have to call the job "teaching assistant"?

No. The opinion said substance controlled over the name of the position. Academic teaching duties could qualify even under a different institutional title. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

Could research work qualify under another title?

Yes. A student employee performing academic research duties related to the degree program could qualify if the other statutory conditions were met. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

How much did the student have to work?

Section 54.063 required employment of at least one-half time in the qualifying teaching or research assistant position. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

Did the position have to relate to the student's degree?

Yes. The statute required the position to relate to the assistant's degree program under rules established by the employing institution. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

Did ordinary campus employment qualify?

No. The opinion excluded auxiliary-enterprise jobs and other nonacademic activities. The amendment intentionally removed the former coverage for "other student employees." Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

Background and statutory framework

Former section 54.051(o) extended resident-rate tuition to a teaching assistant, research assistant, or other student employee, and to the employee's spouse and children, when the student worked at least half time in a job related to the degree program. House Bill 1147 deleted "other student employees" and moved the rule to section 54.063. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

Floor debate identified abuse of nonresident waivers by people whose only basis was wanting to work for a university, while describing the retained teaching and research categories as preserving "the academics" who brought benefit and value to Texas institutions. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

Citations and references

  • Education Code §§54.051(o), 54.063
  • House Bill No. 1147, 69th Legislature; House Floor Debate, March 19, 1985
  • Code Construction Act, V.T.C.S. art. 5429b-2, §3.03
  • Minton v. Frank, 545 S.W.2d 442, 445 (Tex. 1976)
  • Calvert v. British-American Oil Producing Co., 397 S.W.2d 839, 842 (Tex. 1965)
  • Huntsville Independent School District v. McAdams, 221 S.W.2d 546 (Tex. 1949)
  • Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Railroad Commission, 200 S.W.2d 626, 629 (Tex. 1947)
  • Wortham v. Walker, 128 S.W.2d 1138, 1150 (Tex. 1939)
  • Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co., 185 S.W. 556, 562 (Tex. 1916)

Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0370.pdf

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain. The linked PDF is authoritative.

The Attorney General of Texas

October 25, 1985

Honorable Wilhelmina Delco
Chairman
Higher Education Committee
Texas House of Representatives
P. O. Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78769

Opinion No. JM-370

Re: Interpretation of "teaching assistant" and "research assistant" in section 54.063 of the Education Code

Dear Representative Delco:

You requested an interpretation of section 54.063 of the Texas Education Code as it was renumbered and amended by House Bill No. 1147 of the Sixty-ninth Legislature. Section 54.063 waives the payment of nonresident tuition for certain persons who are not residents of Texas.

Prior to the Sixty-ninth Legislature, section 54.051(o) of the Texas Education Code waived nonresident tuition for a teaching assistant, research assistant, or other student employee of an institution of higher education, along with his spouse and children, if the student employee was employed at least one-half time in a position that related to his degree program. House Bill No. 1147 restricted that waiver to research assistants and teaching assistants, deleting from the waiver "other student employees." Section 54.063 now provides that:

A teaching assistant or research assistant of any institution of higher education and the spouse and children of such a teaching assistant or research assistant are entitled to register in a state institution of higher education by paying the tuition fees and other fees or charges required for Texas residents under Section 54.051 of this code, without regard to the length of time the assistant has resided in Texas, if the assistant is employed at least one-half time in a teaching or research assistant position which relates to the assistant's degree program under rules and regulations established by the employer institution.

The issue before us is the meaning of "teaching assistants or research assistants" and whether those terms, as used by the legislature in section 54.063, include only students whose jobs have the specific title of "teaching assistant" or "research assistant." We conclude that those terms are not intended to indicate titles of positions but are descriptive of the functions of certain university employees who are entitled to the waiver.

The dominant consideration in construing a statute is the legislative intent. Where the intent is apparent from the words of the statute, it is not necessary to analyze the extrinsic evidence of legislative intent. See Minton v. Frank, 545 S.W.2d 442, 445 (Tex. 1976); Calvert v. British-American Oil Producing Co., 397 S.W.2d 839, 842 (Tex. 1965). Where the language of the statute is ambiguous, the legislative intent may be ascertained by looking beyond the statute. See Huntsville Independent School District v. McAdams, 221 S.W.2d 546 (Tex. 1949). Statutes should be construed in light of the circumstances existing at the time of their enactment, the evil sought to be corrected, and the purpose to be accomplished. See Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Railroad Commission, 200 S.W.2d 626, 629 (Tex. 1947); Wortham v. Walker, 128 S.W.2d 1138, 1150 (Tex. 1939). The Code Construction Act, V.T.C.S. art. 5429b-2, §3.03, provides that, in construing a statute, a court may consider, among other matters, the object sought to be attained, the circumstances under which the statute was enacted, and legislative history.

House Bill No. 1147 is a comprehensive bill relating to tuition and fees at institutions of higher education. It sets forth the state's policy on tuition and constitutes the first major revision of tuition for students in many years. The bill was amended on the house floor to limit several waivers of nonresident tuition which had been granted to persons who are not residents of this state. Discussion on the floor amendment in question indicates:

  1. that the amendment dealt with three areas where waivers were being abused, one being that the mere fact that a person from out-of-state wants to work for a university should not exempt the person from nonresident tuition;

  2. that the amendment to House Bill No. 1147 eliminated only "other employees," leaving a waiver for teaching assistants, research assistants, and their spouses and children; and

  3. that "by keeping the academics," out-of-state residents who bring something of benefit and value to our institutions would be protected.

See House Floor Debate, March 19, 1985, Second Reading of House Bill No. 1147, 69th Legislature.

The institutions of higher education in this state use numerous and different names as job titles for the positions held by student employees. Normally, in determining the character or nature of an entity, a court is guided by substance and not by a name. See Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co., 185 S.W. 556, 562 (Tex. 1916); 526 S.W.2d 288, 291 (Tex. Civ. App. - Tyler 1975, no writ).

We find no indication that the legislature intended the waiver of nonresident tuition to apply to a student assistant only if the title of the student's job is "teaching assistant" or "research assistant." It is our opinion that the legislature used the terms teaching assistant and research assistant in section 54.063 as descriptive terms identifying the duties and responsibilities of the student jobs that entitle out-of-state students to register at Texas universities on the payment of resident tuition.

It also is our opinion that the legislature's purpose in granting such tuition incentives to nonresident students is the enhancement of the quality of the academic assistants who perform important scholarly roles in the academic programs of institutions of higher education. We conclude that the waiver of nonresident tuition in section 54.063 is intended to apply to student assistants with academic duties in all academic programs of a university, whether the programs are teaching or research, if the assistant is employed at least one-half time in a position that relates to the assistant's degree program under rules and regulations established by the employer institution. The waiver in section 54.063 is not intended to apply to student employees who assist in auxiliary enterprises or are employed in nonacademic activities at a university.

SUMMARY

The terms "teaching assistant" and "research assistant," as used in section 54.063 of the Texas Education Code, are not intended as titles of positions that determine the entitlement of nonresident student employees to a waiver of nonresident tuition at institutions of higher education but are intended to describe the academic positions of the student employees who are entitled to such a waiver under that section.

Very truly yours,

JIM MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas

TOM GREEN
First Assistant Attorney General

DAVID R. RICHARDS
Executive Assistant Attorney General

ROBERT GRAY
Special Assistant Attorney General

RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee

Prepared by Nancy Sutton
Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE

Rick Gilpin, Chairman
Colin Carl
Susan Garrison
Jim Moellinger
Jennifer Riggs
Nancy Sutton
Sarah Woelk
Bruce Youngblood

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1985 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.