Is the medical information I submit to get disability accommodations on a Texas licensing exam kept confidential?

Plain-English summary

The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners licenses architects, landscape architects, and interior designers, and each applicant has to pass a professional exam. To comply with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, the Board offers accommodations to examinees with disabilities, but it requires each person who asks for an accommodation to document the disability on a "disability assessment form." Most of the time a physician fills out that form, describing the diagnosis, how the disability affects major life activities, and what accommodations would help. The form also carries an optional question the examinee can answer directly. The Board's executive director asked the Attorney General whether that medical information is confidential, and whether the privacy rules in title I of the ADA carry over to information the Board collects under titles II and III.

The Attorney General drew a line based on who provides the information. When a physician records diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment details on the form, that is a physician-patient communication protected by chapter 159 of the Occupations Code. The Board may not disclose it except as consistent with the purpose for which it was gathered, namely assessing disabilities to arrange exam accommodations, and it is excepted from public disclosure under the Public Information Act. The opinion noted that chapter 159 reaches records created by a "physician," meaning a person licensed to practice medicine, and that records of some other health professionals (such as mental-health providers and chiropractors) carry their own statutory confidentiality. Because the Board said the form is usually completed by a physician, the opinion confined its discussion to that situation.

Information the examinee supplies directly, such as the answer to the optional question, falls outside chapter 159. That material is shielded from the public only if a different Public Information Act exception fits the particular item, for example the privacy test Texas courts apply to medical or disability information.

On the federal question, the opinion held that title I of the ADA (the employment title) is the only part that expressly requires medical information to be kept in separate files and treated as confidential. Titles II and III, which cover public entities and licensing examinations, contain no comparable confidentiality command, and no authority extends title I's rules to them. The Attorney General concluded that whether to add federal confidentiality protection to title II and title III records is a decision for Congress or the Department of Justice, so for now the Board must rely on Texas law to protect applicants' medical information from a Public Information Act request.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2002. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later Attorney General opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

What the opinion meant for those who asked

The Board and other Texas licensing agencies (what the opinion held): The opinion told the Board that physician-completed diagnosis and evaluation entries on a disability assessment form were confidential under Occupations Code chapter 159 and excepted from public release, but that material the examinee wrote in directly was not, unless a separate Public Information Act exception covered it.

Examinees with disabilities (what the opinion held): The opinion held that medical details their physician placed on the form were protected by the physician-patient privilege, while answers they supplied themselves got no automatic confidentiality and depended on whether another exception applied.

Physicians and other health professionals completing the form (what the opinion held): The opinion treated a physician's entries as a confidential record of identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment under section 159.002, and noted that certain other providers (such as mental-health professionals and chiropractors) have their own statutory confidentiality.

Common questions

If my doctor fills out the disability form for a Texas licensing exam, can the public get those records?
Under this opinion, no. The diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment information a physician records is confidential under chapter 159 of the Occupations Code and is excepted from disclosure under the Public Information Act.

What about information I write in myself on the form?
The opinion concluded chapter 159 does not cover information the examinee provides directly. That information is shielded from the public only if some other exception to the Public Information Act applies to the specific item.

Does the ADA itself keep this medical information confidential?
Not the part that applies here. The opinion held that title I of the ADA requires confidentiality in the employment setting, but titles II and III, which govern public entities and licensing exams, have no equivalent rule. The Board has to rely on Texas law.

Does the form have to be completed by a physician?
The form calls for "an appropriate licensed health care professional," which can include non-physicians. The opinion limited its analysis to physician-completed forms because the Board said that is the usual case, and it noted that other health professionals may have their own confidentiality statutes.

Background and statutory framework

The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners administers the registration statutes for architects, landscape architects, and interior designers, and applicants must pass a licensing examination. Tex. Occ. Code Ann. chs. 1051-1053 (Vernon 2002); §§ 1051.304, 1052.153, 1053.154. The federal Americans with Disabilities Act requires accommodations for examinees with disabilities. 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2000). Title I covers employment discrimination, title II covers public entities, and title III covers public accommodations and entities offering licensing examinations. Id. §§ 12111-12117, 12131-12165, 12181-12189; § 12132; § 12189; see also 28 C.F.R. pts. 35 & 36; 28 C.F.R. § 36.309(a),(b) (2001). The Board, a public entity, falls under title II, and title III applies to licensing examinations. See Agranoff v. Law Sch. Admission Council, Inc., 97 F. Supp.2d 86 (D. Mass. 1999); Ware v. Wyoming Bd. of Law Exam'rs, 973 F. Supp. 1339, 1353 (D. Wyo. 1997), aff'd, 161 F.3d 19 (10th Cir. 1998); D'Amico v. New York State Bd. of Law Exam'rs, 813 F. Supp. 217, 221 (W.D.N.Y. 1993).

Section 159.002 of the Occupations Code makes a physician-patient communication, and a physician-created record of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient, confidential and privileged, releasable only as the chapter allows; a person who receives such information may not disclose it except as consistent with the purpose for which it was first obtained. Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 159.002 (Vernon 2002). Chapter 159 applies to records made by a "physician," a person licensed to practice medicine. Id. § 151.002(12). Because the disability assessment form can be completed by "an appropriate licensed health care professional," a category that may include non-physicians, the opinion confined its analysis to physician-completed forms. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 311.0025(d)(1) (Vernon 2001); Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 453.001(9) (Vernon 2002). It noted that other providers carry their own confidentiality statutes. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 611.002 (Vernon 1992) (mental-health records); Tex. Occ. Code Ann. §§ 201.401-.405 (Vernon 2002) (chiropractors).

Information an examinee supplies directly, such as the optional question, is outside chapter 159 and is excepted from public disclosure under the Public Information Act, chapter 552 of the Government Code, only if it fits another exception, applying the privacy test in Indus. Found. of the S. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 682 (Tex. 1976). On the federal question, only title I expressly requires medical information to be maintained in separate files and treated as confidential. 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(2)(A), (d)(3), (d)(3)(B), (d)(4)(C) (2000); 29 C.F.R. § 1630.14(b)(1), (d)(1) (2001). Titles II and III have no comparable provision, and courts have not extended title I's confidentiality requirement to them. See Doe v. Nat'l Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 199 F.3d 146, 158 (3d Cir. 1999). The opinion concluded the Board must rely on state law to protect this information from a Public Information Act request.

Citations

Statutes:

• Tex. Occ. Code Ann. chs. 1051-1053 (Vernon 2002)
• Tex. Occ. Code Ann. §§ 1051.304, 1052.153, 1053.154
• Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 159.002 (Vernon 2002)
• Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 151.002(12)
• Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 453.001(9) (Vernon 2002)
• Tex. Occ. Code Ann. §§ 201.401-.405 (Vernon 2002)
• Tex. Gov't Code ch. 552
• Tex. Hum. Res. Code Ann. §§ 121.010-.011 (Vernon 2001)
• Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 311.0025(d)(1) (Vernon 2001)
• Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 611.002 (Vernon 1992)
• 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2000)
• 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117
• 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12165
• 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189
• 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (2000)
• 42 U.S.C. § 12189 (2000)
• 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(2)(A), (d)(3), (d)(3)(B), (d)(4)(C) (2000)
• 28 C.F.R. pts. 35 & 36
• 28 C.F.R. § 36.309(a),(b) (2001)
• 29 C.F.R. pt. 1630
• 29 C.F.R. § 1630.14(b)(1), (d)(1) (2001)

Cases:

• Agranoff v. Law Sch. Admission Council, Inc., 97 F. Supp.2d 86 (D. Mass. 1999)
• Ware v. Wyoming Bd. of Law Exam'rs, 973 F. Supp. 1339, 1353 (D. Wyo. 1997), aff'd, 161 F.3d 19 (10th Cir. 1998)
• D'Amico v. New York State Bd. of Law Exam'rs, 813 F. Supp. 217, 221 (W.D.N.Y. 1993)
• Indus. Found. of the S. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 682 (Tex. 1976)
• Doe v. Nat'l Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 199 F.3d 146, 158 (3d Cir. 1999)

Prior Attorney General materials referenced: Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0050 (1999); Tex. Att'y Gen. ORD-565 (1990), ORD-641 (1996), ORD-475 (1987), ORD-470 (1987), ORD-455 (1987).

Source

• Landing page: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/john-cornyn/jc-0555
• Original PDF: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/2002/jc0555.pdf

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from the official PDF. Minor extraction artifacts were corrected; the linked PDF is authoritative.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL . STATE OF TEXAS
JOHN CORNYN

September 12, 2002

Ms. Cathy L. Hendricks Opinion No. JC-0555
Executive Director
Texas Board of Architectural Examiners Re: Confidentiality of disability information
333 Guadalupe, Suite 2-350 collected by the Texas Board of Architectural
Austin, Texas 78701-3942 Examiners, and related questions (RQ-0529-JC)

Dear Ms. Hendricks:

The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners ("the Board") asks about its duty or authority to maintain the confidentiality of medical information about disabled candidates for registration who request accommodations for the registration exam.[1] The Board recognizes that the requirements of the Texas Public Information Act, chapter 552 of the Government Code, will apply to requests for such information, even if the information is confidential by statute and ultimately must be withheld from public disclosure. It seeks this opinion to determine whether it should reconsider the information it asks such candidates to submit as evidence of their need for accommodations. See Hendricks Brief, supra note 1, at 5.

The Board administers the statutes governing the registration of architects, landscape architects, and interior designers. See generally TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. chs. 1051-1053 (Vernon 2002). Applicants for registration in these areas must take a professional licensing exam. See id. §§ 1051.304, 1052.153, 1053.154. To comply with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, see 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2000) (the "ADA"), the Board arranges for accommodations for examinees with disabilities, requiring each examinee who has requested accommodation to submit evidence of disability. See generally Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0050 (1999) at 4-5 (authority of licensing board to require examinee to provide documentation of disability and need for accommodations).[2] For this purpose, the Board uses a disability assessment form consisting of questions to be answered by "an appropriate licensed health care professional."[3]

You ask whether information that the Board receives on the disability assessment form is confidential under chapter 159 of the Texas Occupations Code, which governs physician-patient communications. See Hendricks Brief, supra note 1, at 4. Information about the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient provided to the Board by a physician is confidential under chapter 159 of the Occupations Code, and the Board may not disclose it except to the extent that disclosure is consistent with the authorized purposes for which it was obtained. See TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 159.002 (Vernon 2002). A disability assessment form may also include an examinee's answer to an optional question, and such information, provided directly to the Board by the examinee, is not confidential under chapter 159 of the Occupations Code and will be excepted from public disclosure under the Public Information Act only if another exception applies to it. You also ask "[w]hether the privacy provisions in title I of the ADA apply by analogy to information regarding examinees' medical histories and medical conditions obtained by the Board under title II and title III of the ADA." See Hendricks Brief, supra note 1, at 4. The privacy provisions in title I of the ADA do not apply to medical information obtained by the Board under title II and title III of the ADA.

Attorney General Opinion JC-0050 addressed the effect of the ADA on licensing examinations administered by the Texas Board of Professional Engineers. We quote from the overview of the ADA provided by this opinion:

Title I of the ADA prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of disability, see [42 U.S.C.] §§ 12111-12117; title II prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities, see id. §§ 12131-12165; and title III prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in places of public accommodation, see id. §§ 12181-12189. The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has promulgated rules enforcing title I of the ADA, see 29 C.F.R. pt. 1630 (1998), and the United States Department of Justice . . . has promulgated rules implementing titles II and III, see 28 C.F.R. pts. 35 (implementing title II, subchapter A) & 36 (1998), and has published extensive commentary to those rules, see 28 C.F.R. pt. 35, App. A to pt. 35 (1988) (Section-by-Section Analysis) . . . pt. 36, App. B. to pt. 36 (1998) (Section-by-Section Analysis and Response to Comments).

Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0050 (1999) at 1-2.

State agencies are subject to the ADA, in particular title II and regulations promulgated under title II. See 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (2000); 28 C.F.R. pt. 35 (2001). See also Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0050 (1999) at 2. In addition, title III provides in section 12189 that any person that offers professional licensing examinations must offer such examinations "in a place and manner accessible to persons with disabilities or offer alternative accessible arrangements for such individuals." 42 U.S.C. § 12189 (2000). This provision applies to public entities that administer examinations for licensing and credential purposes and to private entities that administer examinations used by public entities. See Agranoff v. Law Sch. Admission Council, Inc., 97 F. Supp.2d 86 (D. Mass. 1999) (Law School Admissions Test [LSAT]); Ware v. Wyoming Bd. of Law Exam'rs, 973 F. Supp. 1339, 1353 (D. Wyo. 1997), aff'd, 161 F.3d 19 (10th Cir. 1998) (bar examination); D'Amico v. New York State Bd. of Law Exam'rs, 813 F. Supp. 217, 221 (W.D.N.Y. 1993) (bar examination). See also Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0050 (1999) at 2.

The Board itself administers the examination for licensing as a landscape architect and contracts with other entities to administer the examinations for licensing as an architect or interior designer. See Hendricks Brief, supra note 1, at 1. You state that the Board, as required by law, provides reasonable accommodations for disabled individuals taking these exams and requires the applicant to provide reasonable proof of disability. See id. See also 42 U.S.C. § 12189 (2000); 28 C.F.R. § 36.309(a),(b) (2001); Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0050 (1999). The Board's disability assessment form requires an appropriate licensed health care professional to describe the "specific diagnosis of the examinee's disability, its effect on major life activities, and the anticipated duration of the impairment"[;] to describe specific limitations on the examinee's ability to evaluate written material, to complete graphic sections of the examination, and to complete computerized sections of the examination; to provide information on whether the examinee's disability limits the amount of time the examinee can spend on specific examination tasks; and to describe how the disability can best be accommodated. See Disability Assessment Form, supra note 3. An optional question allows the health care professional and the examinee to provide additional information, and the form is signed by both persons. See id. at 2.

You ask whether the information recorded on the disability assessment form is confidential under section 159.002(b) of the Texas Occupations Code. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 4. Section 159.002 of the Occupations Code provides as follows:

(a) A communication between a physician and a patient, relative to or in connection with any professional services as a physician to the patient, is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter.

(b) A record of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that is created or maintained by a physician is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter.

(c) A person who receives information from a confidential communication or record as described by this chapter, other than a person listed in Section 159.004 who is acting on the patient's behalf, may not disclose the information except to the extent that disclosure is consistent with the authorized purposes for which the information was first obtained.

(e) The privilege of confidentiality may be claimed by the patient or by the physician. . . .

TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 159.002 (Vernon 2002) (emphasis added).

Chapter 159 of the Occupations Code applies to patient records created or maintained by a physician, that is, a person licensed to practice medicine in Texas. See id. § 151.002(12). The Board's disability assessment form, however, is to be completed by "an appropriate licensed health care professional," a category that may include nonphysicians. See, e.g., TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 311.0025(d)(1) (Vernon 2001) (concerning audits of hospital billing and defining health care professional); TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 453.001(9) (Vernon 2002) (defining health care professionals who may refer a person for health care services). Because your brief indicates that the disability assessment form is generally completed by a physician, see Hendricks Brief, supra note 1, at 3, we limit our discussion accordingly. We note, however, that the patient communications and records of certain other health care professionals are confidential by statute. See, e.g., TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 611.002 (Vernon 1992) (mental health records within Health and Safety Code); TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. §§ 201.401-.405 (Vernon 2002) (chapter 201 subchapter I, chiropractors-patient confidentiality). The form also includes an optional question that the examinee may answer, and we will deal separately with information that the examinee provides to the Board in answering it.

If the Board receives "information from a confidential communication or record" as described by chapter 159 of the Occupations Code, it may not disclose the information "except to the extent that disclosure is consistent with the authorized purposes for which the information was first obtained." TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 159.002(c) (Vernon 2002). See also Tex. Att'y Gen. ORD-565 (1990) at 7 (overruled in part on issue unrelated to this opinion). The disability assessment form asks the physician to state the diagnosis of the examinee's disability and to evaluate its effects on the examinee from various perspectives. It is a record of "the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment" of the patient created by the physician. TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 159.002(b) (Vernon 2002). Such information is excepted from disclosure to the public under the Public Information Act, chapter 552 of the Government Code, and is subject to release only in accordance with chapter 159 of the Occupations Code. See id.; see generally Tex. Att'y Gen. ORD-565 (1990) at 7 (overruled in part on issue unrelated to this opinion). When the physician has completed a disability assessment form by answering the questions, the form will contain information that is confidential pursuant to section 159.002 of the Occupations Code, and the Board will not be authorized to disclose the information except as necessary to assess disabilities for purposes of providing accommodations at the examinations. See TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 159.002(c) (Vernon 2002).

The optional question allows the examinee as well as the physician to provide information concerning the examinee's disability and the accommodations he or she needs for the examination. Chapter 159 of the Occupations Code does not apply to information that the examinee provides directly to the Board in answering the optional question. Information provided by the examinee will be excepted from public disclosure under the Public Information Act only if it is within an exception to the Act, which will depend on the specific item of information. See generally Indus. Found. of the S. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 682 (Tex. 1976) (stating test for information that is private under Act). See also Tex. Att'y Gen. ORD-475 (1987), ORD-470 (1987) (overruled in part on issue unrelated to this opinion), ORD-455 (1987) (considering whether medical information about an individual or information indicating specific disabilities is protected from public disclosure by a constitutional or common-law right of privacy).

You also ask "[w]hether the privacy provisions in title I of the ADA apply by analogy to information regarding examinees' medical histories and medical conditions obtained by the Board under title II and title III of the ADA, thus requiring the Board to maintain this information in separate files and to treat such information as confidential medical records." Hendricks Brief, supra note 1, at 4. Title I prohibits discrimination in employment and limits the extent to which an employer subject to the ADA may require applicants and employees to provide information concerning disabilities. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12117 (2000). See also Tex. Att'y Gen. ORD-641 (1996) at 3. During the job application phase, an employer generally is prohibited from requiring an applicant to undergo a medical examination or to answer medical inquiries. See 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(2)(A) (2000); 29 C.F.R. pt. 1630 App. B, at 367 (2001). See also Tex. Att'y Gen. ORD-641 (1996) at 3. After a job offer is made, an employer may require an applicant to have a medical examination and may condition the job offer on the results of the examination. See 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(3) (2000). The employer may also collect from applicants information about medical condition or history after a job offer has been made. Id. "[M]edical condition or history" information collected on applicants after an employment offer is made and accepted must be "collected and maintained on separate forms and in separate medical files and . . . treated as a confidential medical record." Id. § 12112(d)(3)(B). See also 29 C.F.R. § 1630.14(b)(1) (2001) (providing that this information "shall be collected and maintained on separate forms and in separate medical files and be treated as a confidential medical record"). Information "regarding the medical condition or history of any employee" obtained as part of a work-site based health program also must be maintained on separate forms, in separate files, and be kept confidential. 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(4)(C) (2000). See also 29 C.F.R. § 1630.14(d)(1) (2001) (providing that this information "shall be collected and maintained on separate forms and in separate medical files and be treated as a confidential medical record").

Title I and the rules promulgated thereunder expressly provide that medical information collected on applicants and employees shall be maintained in separate medical files and shall be treated as confidential medical records. There are no comparable provisions in title II, title III, or the rules promulgated thereunder. See Doe v. Nat'l Bd. of Med. Exam'rs, 199 F.3d 146, 158 (3d Cir. 1999) (no provision of title III of the ADA explicitly requires confidentiality from providers of public accommodation, in contrast to title I, which requires employers to protect the confidentiality of employees with disabilities, with certain specific exceptions). We find no authority applying the confidentiality requirements of title I to title II or III of the ADA. It is a matter for the United States Congress or for the Department of Justice acting under rule-making authority to decide whether medical records obtained under titles II and III should be subject to federal confidentiality provisions. Information you collect pursuant to title II or title III is not subject to the confidentiality requirements of title I. Accordingly, the Board must rely on state law as discussed in this opinion to protect applicants' medical information from disclosure to the public pursuant to a request under the Public Information Act.

SUMMARY

Pursuant to the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, the Texas Board of Architectural Examiners considers prospective examinees' requests for special accommodations in the exams the Board requires for licensure as an architect, landscape architect, or interior designer. The Board uses a disability assessment form to determine whether an examinee who requests accommodations has a disability and the nature of accommodations needed as a result of disability.

Information about "the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment" of an applicant placed on a disability assessment form by his or her physician is confidential under chapter 159 of the Occupations Code and subject to release only under its provisions. See TEX. OCC. CODE ANN. § 159.002 (Vernon 2002). Such information is excepted from disclosure to the public under the Public Information Act, chapter 552 of the Government Code.

A disability assessment form may also include an examinee's or a non-physician's answer to an optional question, and such information, provided directly to the Board by the examinee, may be excepted from public disclosure under the Public Information Act if it is within an exception to that Act.

The privacy provisions in title I of the ADA do not apply to medical information obtained by the Board under title II and title III of the ADA. The Board must rely on state law to protect applicants' medical information from disclosure to the public pursuant to a request under the Public Information Act.

Very truly yours,

JOHN CORNYN
Attorney General of Texas

HOWARD G. BALDWIN, JR.
First Assistant Attorney General

NANCY FULLER
Deputy Attorney General - General Counsel

SUSAN DENMON GUSKY
Chair, Opinion Committee

Susan L. Garrison
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee

[1] Letter Brief from Cathy L. Hendricks, Executive Director, Texas Board of Architectural Examiners, to Honorable John Cornyn, Texas Attorney General (Apr. 3, 2002) (on file with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter Hendricks Brief].

[2] You do not ask whether Human Resources Code sections 121.010 and 121.011, which relate to testing individuals with disabilities, apply to the Board. See TEX. HUM. RES. CODE ANN. §§ 121.010-.011 (Vernon 2001).

[3] See TEX. BD. OF ARCHITECTURAL EXAM'RS, DISABILITY ASSESSMENT FORM, attached to Hendricks Brief, supra note 1, also available at http://www.tbae.state.tx.us/HOME/testaccommodations.pdf (last visited July 29, 2002) [hereinafter Disability Assessment Form].