🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX JC-0477 March 12, 2002

When you cancel a Texas prepaid funeral plan, do you get back half the earnings on your money?

Short answer: Only if the plan is trust-funded. The Attorney General concluded that the 2001 amendment to section 154.155(d) of the Finance Code, which lets a purchaser who cancels a prepaid funeral benefits contract recover the amount paid plus half of all earnings attributable to that money, applies only to trust-funded contracts. It does not apply to insurance-funded contracts, because the statutory definition of 'earnings' is tied to trust accounts, and because insurance-funded plans are refunded instead through the cash surrender value or nonforfeiture benefit of the insurance policy.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2002. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2002
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority in Texas courts but are not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Statutes can be amended; verify current law before relying on anything here. Consult a licensed attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A prepaid funeral plan lets a person pay in advance for funeral services or merchandise. In Texas, those plans come in two forms: trust-funded, where the buyer's payments go into a trust account, and insurance-funded, where the buyer takes out a life insurance policy with the funeral seller named as beneficiary. In 2001 the Legislature changed the refund rule for people who cancel these plans. The old rule gave a canceling buyer back only the actual amount paid in. The amendment to section 154.155(d) of the Finance Code added that the buyer is also entitled to "half of all earnings attributable to that money." The state Banking Commissioner asked the Attorney General whether that enhanced refund reaches insurance-funded plans, or only trust-funded ones.

The Attorney General concluded that the new half-of-earnings refund applies only to trust-funded contracts. Two reasons drove the answer. First, the Finance Code defines "earnings" (in section 154.002(4)) as the amount in an account, above what the buyer paid in, that is deposited under section 154.253, and section 154.253 sits in the subchapter governing trust-funded plans. There are no statutory "earnings" of an insurance-funded plan to split. Second, the Legislature already provided a different refund mechanism for insurance-funded plans: a canceling buyer there recovers the cash surrender value of the policy (in the first year) or a nonforfeiture benefit or cash surrender value under articles 3.44a and 3.44b of the Insurance Code (later on). The opinion also rejected two arguments for the broader reading: that section 154.155's placement in a "General Provisions" subchapter made it apply to both kinds of plans (statutory headings do not expand a statute's meaning), and that the predecessor statute's history showed the refund language once covered insurance-funded plans (a close reading showed it never did).

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2002. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later Attorney General opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here. Chapter 154 of the Finance Code and the cited Insurance Code articles have been amended and recodified since 2002, so confirm the current refund rules before relying on this opinion.

What the opinion meant for those who asked

The Texas Department of Banking, which regulates these plans (what the opinion held for it): The opinion told the Banking Commissioner that the enhanced section 154.155(d) refund (amount paid plus half of earnings) was to be administered only for trust-funded prepaid funeral contracts, not insurance-funded ones.

Sellers of prepaid funeral plans (what the opinion held for them): The opinion concluded that a buyer who cancels a trust-funded plan after the first year is entitled to payments plus half the earnings, while a buyer who cancels an insurance-funded plan is refunded through the policy's cash surrender value or a nonforfeiture benefit, not through the half-of-earnings formula.

Consumers who bought a prepaid funeral plan (what the opinion held for them): The opinion explained that the refund a canceling buyer receives depends on which kind of plan they have. Trust-funded buyers were entitled to the new half-of-earnings amount; insurance-funded buyers were entitled to the insurance policy's surrender or nonforfeiture value.

Common questions

Does the half-of-earnings refund apply to every prepaid funeral plan in Texas?
No. Under this opinion, it applied only to trust-funded plans. Insurance-funded plans were refunded through the insurance policy instead.

Why did the type of plan change the refund?
The Attorney General read the statutory definition of "earnings" in section 154.002(4) as tied to money deposited in a trust account under section 154.253, which governs trust-funded plans. An insurance-funded plan has no such statutory "earnings" to divide.

What does someone with an insurance-funded plan get if they cancel?
The opinion pointed to the cash surrender value of the policy during the first year (section 154.205), and a nonforfeiture benefit or cash surrender value afterward, under articles 3.44a and 3.44b of the Insurance Code.

Didn't the refund section sit in a "General Provisions" chapter that covers both plan types?
It did, but the opinion concluded that placement does not control. Under section 311.024 of the Code Construction Act, the heading of a subchapter does not limit or expand the meaning of a statute.

Background and statutory framework

Prepaid funeral benefits contracts in Texas are governed by chapter 154 of the Finance Code, and a seller must hold a permit from the Texas Department of Banking. Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.101 (Vernon 1998). The plans are funded either by a trust created under subchapter F or by an insurance policy approved by the Texas Department of Insurance under subchapter E. Id. § 154.201 (Vernon 1998). An insurance-funded plan involves two contracts: one between the buyer and the funeral seller, and a separate insurance policy with the seller as beneficiary. Id. § 154.202 (Vernon 1998). Money received must be administered as prescribed by section 154.155 and subchapters E and F. Id. § 154.159.

Before 2001, section 154.155(d) entitled a canceling purchaser to "only the actual amount paid by the purchaser less the amount permitted to be retained as provided by Section 154.252," subject to exceptions for solicited cancellations and for the first-year provisions in sections 154.205 (insurance-funded) and 154.254 (trust-funded). Senate Bill 314 amended subsection (d) to entitle the purchaser to "the actual amount paid by the purchaser and half of all earnings attributable to that money." Act of May 24, 2001, 77th Leg., R.S., ch. 699, § 7, 2001 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 1254, 1256.

The opinion's first ground was the definition of "earnings." Section 154.002(4) defines "earnings" as the amount in an account above what the buyer paid, deposited as provided by section 154.253, including accrued interest, income, and increased value. Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.002(4) (Vernon Supp. 2002). Section 154.253(a) requires trust-funded money to be deposited in an interest-bearing account or held in trust, so the "earnings" the statute splits are earnings of trust-funded contracts. Its second ground was the surrounding regulatory scheme: insurance-funded plans are refunded through the policy, including a nonforfeiture benefit or cash surrender value under articles 3.44a and 3.44b of the Insurance Code. Tex. Ins. Code Ann. arts. 3.44a, 3.44b (Vernon 1981 & Supp. 2002). The opinion rejected a heading-based argument under section 311.024, citing In re Hosek, 136 B.R. 672, 673 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1991), and traced the predecessor statute (former article 548b, codified into the Finance Code in 1997) to confirm the refund language never reached insurance-funded contracts. Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg., R.S., ch. 1008, § 1, 1997 Tex. Gen. Laws 3091, 3392; Act of May 26, 1993, 73d Leg., R.S., ch. 808, § 1, 1993 Tex. Gen. Laws 3211.

Citations

Statutory provisions:

  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.155(d) (Vernon Supp. 2002)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.101 (Vernon 1998)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.201 (Vernon 1998)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.202 (Vernon 1998)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.159
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.252
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.205 (Vernon 1998)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.254 (Vernon 1998)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.002(4) (Vernon Supp. 2002)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.253(a)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.257 (Vernon Supp. 2002)
  • Tex. Ins. Code Ann. arts. 3.44a, 3.44b (Vernon 1981 & Supp. 2002)
  • Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 311.024 (Vernon 1998)
  • Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg., R.S., ch. 1008, § 1, sec. 154.155, 1997 Tex. Gen. Laws 3091, 3392
  • Act of May 24, 2001, 77th Leg., R.S., ch. 699, § 7, 2001 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 1254, 1256
  • Act of May 26, 1993, 73d Leg., R.S., ch. 808, § 1, 1993 Tex. Gen. Laws 3211

Cases:

  • In re Hosek, 136 B.R. 672 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1991)

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from the official scanned PDF. Minor character-level errors from the source OCR have been corrected; the linked PDF is authoritative.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL - STATE OF TEXAS

JOHN CORNYN

March 12, 2002

Mr. Randall S. James
Banking Commissioner
Texas Department of Banking
2601 North Lamar Boulevard
Austin, Texas 78705-4294

Opinion No. JC-0477

Re: Applicability of section 154.155(d) of the Finance Code to insurance-funded, prepaid funeral benefits contracts (RQ-0434-JC)

Dear Mr. James:

During the Seventy-seventh Legislative Session, the Texas Legislature amended section 154.155 of the Finance Code, which governs refunds available to consumers who cancel prepaid funeral benefits contracts. Prior to its amendment, section 154.155 provided that, except as provided therein, purchasers of prepaid funeral benefits contracts were entitled to receive only the actual amount paid by the purchaser. The amendment to section 154.155 increased the amount of such a refund to include "half of all earnings attributable to that money." See TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 154.155(d) (Vernon Supp. 2002). You ask whether the amendatory language applies to insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts as well as to trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts, or only to trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts. We conclude that the amendment applies only to trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts.

Prepaid funeral benefits contracts in Texas are governed by chapter 154 of the Finance Code. Any person seeking to sell or accept money for prepaid funeral benefits or solicit an individual's designation of prepaid funeral benefits to be provided out of a fund, investment, security, or contract, including a contract or policy of insurance authorized and sold under a license issued by the Texas Department of Insurance, must hold a permit to do so issued by the Texas Department of Banking. See id. § 154.101 (Vernon 1998). Prepaid funeral benefits contracts are paid for through the purchase or creation of a "fund, investment, security, or contract, including an insurance policy," with the fund created by an insurance policy approved by the Texas Department of Insurance regulated under subchapter E of chapter 154, a trust created under and regulated by subchapter F of chapter 154, or a "fund, investment, security, or contract" approved by the Texas Department of Banking. Id. § 154.201.

Contracts paid for by the creation of a trust involve a purchaser entering into a contract with a seller of funeral services or merchandise, with the payments to the seller deposited into a trust created for that purpose. See generally id. §§ 154.251-.264 (Vernon 1998 & Supp. 2002) (chapter 154, subchapter F). Money deposited into such trusts may be invested only as provided by sections 154.258 and 154.259, of subchapter F of the Finance Code, in accordance with an approved investment plan. See id. § 154.257 (Vernon Supp. 2002). Contracts paid for by the purchase of an insurance policy, on the other hand, involve two contracts, the first between the purchaser and the seller of funeral services and merchandise that must be executed in conjunction with the application for the issuance of the second, an insurance policy typically between the same purchaser and an insurance company, with the seller of the funeral services and merchandise named as the beneficiary of the insurance contract. See id. § 154.202 (Vernon 1998). Money received for prepaid funeral benefits must be administered as prescribed by section 154.155 of the Finance Code and subchapters E and F of the Finance Code, as applicable. See id. § 154.159.

Section 154.155 of the Finance Code, which governs cancellation of contracts for prepaid funeral benefits and the section about which you inquire, provided the following prior to its amendment by the Seventy-seventh Legislature:

(a) A purchaser of a prepaid funeral benefits contract may cancel the contract before maturity by giving written notice of cancellation to the seller on forms prescribed by the department. The seller shall maintain copies of the cancellation forms for examination by the department.

(b) Not later than the 30th day after the date of the cancellation notice, the seller shall withdraw and pay to the purchaser money in the depository being held for the purchaser's use and benefit.

(c) The purchaser or seller may not make a partial cancellation or withdrawal.

(d) The purchaser is entitled to receive only the actual amount paid by the purchaser less the amount permitted to be retained as provided by Section 154.252, except as provided by Subsection (e) and by Sections 154.205 and 154.254.[1]

(e) A purchaser who cancels a contract on the solicitation of the seller is entitled to withdraw all money paid to the seller and all earnings attributable to that money. If the money is used to purchase a new prepaid funeral benefits contract under a solicitation by the seller, the new contract must protect the purchaser to an extent equal to or greater than that provided by the original contract, as determined by the department. Under the new contract, the cost to the purchaser of the same or substantially the same services or merchandise may not be greater than that provided by the canceled contract.

Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg., R.S., ch. 1008, § 1, sec. 154.155, 1997 Tex. Gen. Laws 3091, 3392 (footnote added). Section 154.155 was amended by the Seventy-seventh Legislature by amending subsection (d), which now provides:

(d) The purchaser is entitled to receive the actual amount paid by the purchaser and half of all earnings attributable to that money, less the amount permitted to be retained as provided by Section 154.252, except as provided by Subsection (e) and by Sections 154.205 and 154.254.

TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 154.155(d) (Vernon Supp. 2002) (as amended by Senate Bill 314, Act of May 24, 2001, 77th Leg., R.S., ch. 699, § 7, 2001 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 1254, 1256) (emphasis added). In your letter requesting an opinion from this office you state:

The amendment plainly applies to a trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract. I request your opinion regarding whether the enhanced refund provision also applies to an insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract.[2]

For two reasons we conclude that the amendatory language of subsection (d) properly should be construed to apply only to trust-funded contracts. First, the term "earnings" is defined at section 154.002 of the Finance Code clearly to apply only to earnings of a trust-funded contract. Section 154.002(4) provides:

"Earnings" means the amount in an account in excess of the amount paid by the purchaser of a prepaid funeral benefits contract that is deposited in the account as provided by Section 154.253, including accrued interest, accrued income, and enhanced or increased value.

TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 154.002(4) (Vernon Supp. 2002). Section 154.253, which is set forth in subchapter F governing trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits, requires money paid pursuant to a trust-funded contract to be deposited in a financial institution in an interest-bearing account or in trust with a financial institution to be invested by the financial institution as trustee. See id. § 154.253(a). Thus, half of the "earnings" to which persons are entitled are earnings of trust-funded contracts.

Second, a construction limiting the amendatory language to trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts is consistent with the regulatory scheme adopted by the legislature because the legislature has provided for a form of refund for cancelled life insurance policies or annuities elsewhere. As we noted earlier, insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts actually involve two contracts, a contract for funeral services and merchandise between a purchaser and a seller and an insurance contract between a purchaser and an insurance company with the seller named as a beneficiary. While certain aspects of the contractual relationships are governed by subchapter E of chapter 154 (and section 154.155), the insurance contract itself must be "approved by the Texas Department of Insurance and issued by an insurance company licensed by the Texas Department of Insurance." Id. § 154.201(1) (Vernon 1998). Articles 3.44a and 3.44b of the Insurance Code, which govern life insurance contracts and annuities, respectively, require that all such contracts for insurance contain, inter alia, provisions requiring the company to grant certain benefits, including under certain circumstances, the cash surrender value of the policy in event of default (or, presumably, cancellation). See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. arts. 3.44a, 3.44b (Vernon 1981 & Supp. 2002).

Taken together then, a purchaser who cancels a trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract during the contract's first year is entitled to a refund in an amount based upon the amount paid by the purchaser into the trust. See TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 154.254 (Vernon 1998). If a purchaser cancels a trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract after the contract's first year, the purchaser is entitled to a refund in an amount equal to his payments and half of the earnings generated by those payments. See id. § 154.155(d) (Vernon Supp. 2002). A purchaser who cancels an insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract during the contract's first year is entitled to a refund in an amount based upon the cash surrender value of that insurance contract. See id. § 154.205 (Vernon 1998). If a purchaser cancels an insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract after the insurance policy's or annuity's first year, the purchaser is entitled to a refund based on a "nonforfeiture benefit" or the cash surrender value of the contract as provided by articles 3.44a and 3.44b of the Insurance Code. Therefore, we conclude that the amendatory language to subsection (d) of section 154.155 of the Finance Code applies only to trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts; it does not apply to insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts.

Our conclusion comports with the Sunset Advisory Commission report prepared in anticipation of the Seventy-seventh Legislature. A careful reading of the staff report prepared by the Sunset Advisory Commission regarding the Texas Funeral Commission, several of whose recommendations were included in the "sunset bill" for the Texas Department of Banking, Senate Bill 314, supports limiting the application of the amendatory language of subsection (d) to trust-funded contracts. Both the Texas Department of Banking and the Texas Funeral Commission were subject to the "sunset review" process prior to the 2001 legislative session. The Sunset Advisory Commission for the Texas Funeral Commission addressed problems it identified with the statutes governing, inter alia, prepaid funeral benefits contracts. The staff report recognized the distinction between trust-funded and insurance-funded contracts. The staff did not expressly distinguish between the two in its text recommending statutory amendments regarding refunds of earnings, which was included in Senate Bill 314 as amendatory language to subsection (d). However, a close reading of the text clearly indicates that the staff was referring in its recommendations to trust-funded contracts only:

Problem: Consumers who cancel their prepaid funeral contracts do not receive reasonable refunds.

- Texas statute authorizes contract sellers to take 10 percent of the consumer's principal to cover selling expenses, service costs, and general overhead. Consumers who cancel their prepaid funeral contract receive 90 percent of their original payment. In addition, consumers who cancel their contracts are not entitled by law to receive the interest that their funds have earned. That money remains with the contract seller.

SUNSET ADVISORY COMM'N, STAFF REPORT: TEX. FUNERAL SERVICES COMM'N, at 65 (2000). The statutory provisions referred to apply only to trust-funded contracts; they do not apply to insurance-funded contracts. See TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. §§ 154.205, .254 (Vernon 1998). The staff report describes the income tax consequences of Texas law in this area:

The IRS requires trust-funded contract holders to declare their interest income on their Income Tax Return. Consequently, funeral contract purchasers are held liable for all interest and capital gains accrued by trust-funded investments. Recently the IRS has begun to allow funeral homes to declare trust fund interest on their tax returns. The IRS provision does not require this, however.

SUNSET ADVISORY COMM'N, STAFF REPORT: TEX. FUNERAL SERVICES COMM'N, at 66 (2000). See also SUNSET ADVISORY COMM'N DECISIONS: TEX. FUNERAL SERVICES COMM'N, at 21-23 (2001).

You offer, though do not necessarily endorse, two arguments in support of a construction that the amendatory language of subsection (d) reaches insurance-funded funeral benefits contracts, in addition to trust-funded contracts. We will address each argument in turn.

First, it is suggested that, by inclusion of section 154.155 in the subchapter titled "General Provisions for Sales Contracts," the legislature intended that section to apply to both trust-funded and insurance-funded contracts. See Request Letter, supra note 2, at 2. We find this suggestion unpersuasive. Section 311.024 of the Government Code (the "Code Construction Act") provides that "[t]he heading of a title, subtitle, chapter, subchapter, or section does not limit or expand the meaning of a statute." TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 311.024 (Vernon 1998). Thus, for example,

while the headings and divisions of the Insurance Code might prove useful to the researcher seeking a particular statute, any inferences about the substantive limitations of the statute must be founded upon more than the mere placement or labeling of the provision within the Code.

In re Hosek, 136 B.R. 672, 673 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1991). Similarly, we believe that the mere fact that the legislature placed the text of section 154.155 of the Finance Code in the subchapter containing general provisions for sales contracts does not, by itself, necessarily make every clause of every section of that subchapter equally applicable to both trust-funded and insurance-funded contracts, at least if the clear meaning of the language at issue, as it is here, can apply only to one sort of contract.

Second, it is suggested that the legislative history of section 154.155 prior to the 2001 statutory amendment supports a construction applying the 2001 amendatory language to insurance-funded contracts. Specifically, it is argued that, because the predecessor statute of chapter 154, article 548b of the Revised Civil Statutes, provided in section 1A(e) that refunds due a purchaser upon cancellation of an insurance-funded contract "shall be handled as provided by Section 5(b) of this Act," and because section 5(b) of article 548b provided, inter alia, that a purchaser who cancelled a trust-funded contract after the first year was entitled to receive as a refund only the actual amounts paid in by the purchaser less an amount permitted to be retained by the seller, a purchaser of an insurance-funded contract who cancelled the contract after the first year also was entitled to a refund of the actual amounts paid. See Act of May 26, 1993, 73d Leg., R.S., ch. 808, § 1, 1993 Tex. Gen. Laws 3211, 3214, 3221 (predecessor to chapter 154). Again, we find this suggested argument unpersuasive. The argument presupposes that the refund language of subsection (d), prior to the 2001 amendment, applied to both trust-funded and insurance-funded contracts; it assumes that the inclusion of the language "except as provided by . . . Sections 154.205 [which applies to insurance-funded contracts] and 154.254 [which applies to trust-funded contracts]" in section 154.155(d) necessarily requires such a construction. See TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 154.155(d) (Vernon Supp. 2002). A brief discussion of relevant legislative history of the predecessor statute to section 154.155 of the Finance Code supports the proposition that the refund language of subsection (d), prior to the 2001 amendment, never applied to insurance-funded contracts; therefore, the amendatory language at issue could not either.

The language providing that "[t]he cancellation of an insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract shall be handled as provided by Section 5(b) of this Act" was added to then article 548b in 1993. See Act of May 26, 1993, 73d Leg., R.S., ch. 808, § 1, 1993 Tex. Gen. Laws 3211, 3214. The same bill, in addition to adding a section title and renumbering the provisions to indicate that Section 5 of then article 548b of the Revised Civil Statutes applied to trust-funded contracts, added the following relevant language to subsection (b):

(b)(1) In the event a purchaser under a trust-funded contract should desire to cancel the contract prior to maturity, such cancellation may be accomplished by the purchaser giving to the seller written notice of cancellation on forms prescribed by the Department, and thereafter, the seller within 30 days after the date of the cancellation notice shall withdraw and pay to the purchaser the funds in such depository being held for the purchaser's use and benefit; provided however, such purchaser shall be entitled to receive only the actual amounts paid in by him less the amounts permitted to be retained as provided in Subsection (a)(1) hereof. The seller shall maintain copies of the cancellation forms for examination by the Department. Purchaser or seller may make no partial cancellations for withdrawals.

(2) A purchaser of a trust-funded contract who elects to cancel the contract during the first year of the contract when payments required under the contract are current is entitled to receive 90 percent of the actual amounts paid in by the purchaser or the amounts deposited in trust with respect to the purchaser's contract, whichever is greater, regardless of the amount held in trust. A purchaser of an insurance-funded contract who elects to cancel the contract during the first year of the contract when payments required under the contract are current is entitled to receive the cash surrender value of the policy.

Id. 1993 Tex. Gen. Laws at 3221 (added language is italicized). Thus the only language in section 5 of then article 548b governing cancellation of insurance-funded contracts was set forth in subdivision (2) and applied to cancellation of contracts during the first year. The two sentences of subdivision (2) were codified as Sections 154.205 and 154.254, respectively, in the nonsubstantive codification of the Finance Code in 1997. See Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg., R.S., ch. 1008, §§ 1, 7, 1997 Tex. Gen. Laws 3091, 3394, 3395, 3603. The language in subdivision (1) of section 5 of then article 548b that permitted a refund of amounts paid when a contract was cancelled after the first year and applied only, by its express terms, to trust-funded contracts was codified at what is now section 154.155 of the Finance Code. See id. 1997 Tex. Gen. Laws at 3392; TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 154.155 (Vernon Supp. 2002). Therefore, prior to its nonsubstantive codification, the refund language of section 5 that was codified as part of the new Finance Code at section 154.155 clearly applied only to trust-funded contracts. The inclusion of the "except for" language in subsection (d) that includes a reference to section 154.205 does not have the effect of making the language of the principal clause of the subsection applicable to insurance-funded contracts.

Therefore, we conclude that the amendatory language to section 154.155(d), Finance Code, enacted by the Seventy-seventh Legislature applies only to trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts; it does not apply to insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts.

SUMMARY

The amendatory language of section 154.155(d) of the Finance Code, which entitles a purchaser who cancels a prepaid funeral benefits contract to a refund that includes half of the earnings attributable to the payments made by the purchaser, applies only to trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts; it does not apply to cancellations of insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts.

JOHN CORNYN
Attorney General of Texas

HOWARD G. BALDWIN, JR.
First Assistant Attorney General

NANCY FULLER
Deputy Attorney General - General Counsel

SUSAN DENMON GUSKY
Chair, Opinion Committee

Jim Moellinger
Assistant Attorney General


[1] Section 154.205 of the Finance Code governs cancellation of insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts during the first year of the contract and provides: "A purchaser of an insurance-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract who cancels the contract during the first year of the contract when payments required under the contract are current is entitled to receive the cash surrender value of the policy." TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 154.205 (Vernon 1998). Section 154.254 of the Finance Code governs cancellation of trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contracts during the first year of the contract and provides: "A purchaser of a trust-funded prepaid funeral benefits contract who cancels the contract during the first year of the contract when payments required under the contract are current is entitled to receive, regardless of the amount held in trust, the greater of: (1) 90 percent of the actual amount paid by the purchaser; or (2) the amount deposited in trust with respect to the purchaser's contract." Id. § 154.254.

[2] Letter from Randall S. James, Banking Commissioner of Texas, to Honorable John Cornyn, Texas Attorney General, at 1 (Sept. 13, 2001) (on file with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter Request Letter].

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2002 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.