Can the Texas Comptroller include extra information in the Chapter 313 value-limitation report?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2008. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.
TX AG Opinion GA-0686: What can the Comptroller put in the Chapter 313 report?
Plain-English summary
The Texas Comptroller asked two questions about the biennial report her office must prepare on value-limitation agreements under the Texas Economic Development Act. That Act, codified as Tax Code chapter 313 in 2001, lets a school district cap the appraised value of a property for the maintenance and operations part of its property tax, through an agreement with the company receiving the limitation. In 2007 the Legislature directed the Comptroller to report to the Legislature on the progress of those agreements, with the required contents spelled out in Tax Code sections 313.008 and 313.032, each listing eleven nearly identical items. The Comptroller asked, first, whether the report is limited to those eleven items, and second, whether she may use information recipients marked "confidential."
On the first question, the Attorney General found nothing in the text or legislative history making the eleven-item list exclusive. The Comptroller's express duty to prepare a report assessing each agreement's progress carries implied authority to do what is reasonably necessary to fulfill it. So if the listed items do not supply what is needed to assess progress, the Comptroller may include additional information that is reasonably necessary for that purpose. The opinion stressed the one statutory limit: sections 313.008(b) and 313.032(b) bar including information that is "confidential by law."
On the second question, the opinion drew a careful line. The statutes prohibit only information that is confidential by law, not information a recipient chooses to label "confidential." So a recipient's confidential marking does not by itself keep information out of the report. The information may be used unless it is in fact confidential by law, and the statutes implicitly leave that determination to the Comptroller in the first instance.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 2008. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Chapter 313 of the Tax Code has been amended repeatedly and its reporting provisions renumbered over time, and the program itself has changed. Confirm the current statutes before relying on this analysis.
Who this opinion affected (as of 2008)
The Comptroller's office: The opinion concluded the office could include information beyond the eleven listed items when reasonably necessary to assess agreement progress, and had to decide in the first instance whether any item was confidential by law.
Recipients of value limitations: The opinion clarified that marking information "confidential" did not keep it out of the report; only information confidential by law was excluded.
The Legislature and the public: The opinion treated the report as a progress assessment the Comptroller could make complete, subject to the confidential-by-law bar.
Common questions
Is the Chapter 313 report limited to the eleven listed items?
No. The opinion found no language making the list exclusive, so the Comptroller may add information reasonably necessary to assess the agreements' progress.
Can a recipient keep information out by stamping it "confidential"?
No. The opinion explained the statutes bar only information confidential by law, not information a recipient marks confidential.
Who decides whether information is confidential by law?
The Comptroller, in the first instance, under the opinion's reading of sections 313.008(b) and 313.032(b).
Background and statutory framework
The Texas Economic Development Act, codified as Tax Code chapter 313 in 2001, authorizes a school district to limit a property's appraised value for its maintenance and operations tax through an agreement (Tex. Tax Code Ann. ch. 313 (Vernon 2008); id. § 313.027). The 2007 reporting provisions require a biennial report containing eleven specified items (id. §§ 313.008(a), 313.032(a)) and bar information confidential by law (id. §§ 313.008(b), 313.032(b)); the Comptroller adopts implementing rules and forms (id. § 313.031(a); 34 Tex. Admin. Code § 9.1057(a) (2008)). Courts ascertain legislative intent from the statutory language and may consider legislative history (State v. Shumake, 199 S.W.3d 279, 284 (Tex. 2006); Lexington Ins. Co. v. Strayhorn, 209 S.W.3d 83, 85 (Tex. 2006); Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 311.023(3) (Vernon 2005)). The Comptroller performs duties required by law (Tex. Const. art. IV, § 23), and express statutory authority carries implied authority reasonably necessary to fulfill it (Bullock v. Calvert, 480 S.W.2d 367, 372 (Tex. 1972); Tex. Mun. Power Agency v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 253 S.W.3d 184, 193 (Tex. 2007); Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0427 (2006) at 2).
Citations
Statutes:
- Tex. Tax Code Ann. ch. 313 (Vernon 2008); §§ 313.027, 313.008(a)-(b), 313.032(a)-(b), 313.031(a)
- 34 Tex. Admin. Code § 9.1057(a) (2008)
- Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 311.023(3) (Vernon 2005)
- Tex. Const. art. IV, § 23
Cases:
- State v. Shumake, 199 S.W.3d 279, 284 (Tex. 2006)
- Lexington Ins. Co. v. Strayhorn, 209 S.W.3d 83, 85 (Tex. 2006)
- Bullock v. Calvert, 480 S.W.2d 367, 372 (Tex. 1972)
- Tex. Mun. Power Agency v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 253 S.W.3d 184, 193 (Tex. 2007)
- Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0427 (2006)
Source
- Landing page: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/greg-abbott/ga-0686
- Original PDF: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/2008/ga0686.pdf
Original opinion text
Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain — the linked PDF is authoritative.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
December 11, 2008
The Honorable Susan Combs
Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
Post Office Box 13528
Austin, Texas 78711-3528
Opinion No. GA-0686
Re: Whether the Comptroller's report required by Tax Code sections 313.008 and 313.032 must be limited to the items listed therein and exclude information that is marked as "confidential" (RQ-0727-GA)
Dear Comptroller Combs:
In 2001, the Legislature adopted the Texas Economic Development Act (the "Act"). See Act of May 24, 2001, 77th Leg., R.S., ch. 1505, § 1, 2001 Tex. Gen. Laws 5362, 5362-72 (codified as Tax Code chapter 313). The Act authorizes a school district to limit the appraised value of a property for the maintenance and operations portion of the school district property tax. See generally TEX. TAX CODE ANN. ch. 313 (Vernon 2008). The limitation is set out in an agreement between the school district and the person receiving the appraised value limitation. See id. § 313.027.
In 2007, the Legislature enacted legislation that, in relevant part, requires the Office of the Comptroller of Public Accounts (the "Comptroller") to prepare a biennial report[1] for the Legislature regarding the progress of value limitation agreements entered into pursuant to the Act. See Act of May 25, 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., ch. 1270, § 6, 2007 Tex. Gen. Laws 4249, 4252 (codified as Tax Code section 313.008); Act of May 28, 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., ch. 939, § 17, 2007 Tex. Gen. Laws 3241, 3246 (codified as Tax Code section 313.008); Act of May 25, 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., ch. 1262, § 6, 2007 Tex. Gen. Laws 4225, 4227 (codified as Tax Code section 313.032). The reporting requirements are contained in sections 313.008 and 313.032 of the Tax Code. TEX. TAX CODE ANN. §§ 313.008(a), .032(a) (Vernon 2008). Both sections provide that "[t]he report must be based on data certified to the comptroller by each recipient of a limitation on appraised value . . . and state for each [limitation] agreement" eleven specified items of information.[2] Id. The eleven items of information set out in sections 313.008 and 313.032 are almost identical. Id.
You ask the following questions about this report:
1) Whether the Comptroller's report is limited to the 11 items listed in Sections 313.008(a) and 313.032(a)?
2) Whether the Comptroller may use in the report information provided by recipients of limitation on appraised value agreements, regardless of whether the information was marked as confidential by the recipients?
Request Letter at 1.
I. Applicable Law
Your questions raise issues of statutory construction. In construing a statute, we must ascertain the Legislature's intent in enacting the statute. State v. Shumake, 199 S.W.3d 279, 284 (Tex. 2006). We look "first and foremost" to the statutory language in understanding that intent. Lexington Ins. Co. v. Strayhorn, 209 S.W.3d 83, 85 (Tex. 2006). We may also consider legislative history in construing a statute. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 311.023(3) (Vernon 2005).
Your questions also involve determinations regarding the Comptroller's powers. While the Texas Constitution defines some of the Comptroller's functions and duties, much of the Comptroller's authority is specified by the Legislature. See TEX. CONST. art. IV, § 23 (requiring the Comptroller to "perform such duties as are or may be required by law"). The Comptroller's express statutory authority carries with it implied authority reasonably necessary to carry out the statute's purpose. See Bullock v. Calvert, 480 S.W.2d 367, 372 (Tex. 1972) ("every specific, permissible act of a public officer need not be expressed in a statute; we imply the authority to do those acts necessary to achieve the power or object expressly granted"); Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0427 (2006) at 2; see also Tex. Mun. Power Agency v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 253 S.W.3d 184, 193 (Tex. 2007) ("when the Legislature expressly confers a power on an agency, it also impliedly intends that the agency have whatever powers are reasonably necessary to fulfill its express functions or duties").
[Footnote 1: It appears from your request, which consistently refers to the reports required under sections 313.008 and 313.032 of the Tax Code in the singular, that the Comptroller produces one report in response to the requirements under these two statutes. See Request Letter at 1-3 (available at http://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov). We similarly refer to a single report in our discussion.]
[Footnote 2: Section 313.031 requires the Comptroller to "adopt rules and forms necessary" to implement and administer chapter 313. TEX. TAX CODE ANN. § 313.031(a) (Vernon 2008). The only rule we find relevant to the questions presented provides that "[r]ecipients of property value limitations shall promptly submit to the comptroller information that is required to complete the comptroller's biennial report assessing the progress of each agreement. The comptroller will promulgate a form on which the required information shall be submitted." 34 TEX. ADMIN. CODE § 9.1057(a) (2008) (Tex. Comptroller of Pub. Accounts, Recommendation, Evaluation, and Reports by Comptroller).]
II. Analysis
Neither section 313.008 nor 313.032, which contain the required content of the report, expressly indicate that the list of eleven items is intended to be exclusive in nature. And we find nothing in the legislative history suggesting that the list is intended to be exclusive. Insofar as the list of items in sections 313.008 and 313.032 does not provide the information necessary for the Comptroller to prepare "a report assessing the progress of each agreement," we conclude the Comptroller may include in the report additional information that is reasonably necessary to fulfill the Comptroller's statutory obligation of preparing such a report. See Bullock, 480 S.W.2d at 372.
In sum, because of the lack of any limiting language in sections 313.008 and 313.032 and the Comptroller's implied authority, we conclude that the Comptroller is not precluded from including more information in the report than is required by sections 313.008 and 313.032. This additional information must, however, be reasonably necessary to fulfill the Comptroller's statutory obligation of providing a report that assesses the progress of limitation agreements under the Act. See id. And in no instance may the report include "information that is confidential by law" as expressly prohibited by sections 313.008 and 313.032. See TEX. TAX CODE ANN. §§ 313.008(b), .032(b) (Vernon 2008).
The statutory prohibition against the inclusion of confidential information in the report brings us to your second question, "[w]hether the Comptroller may use in the report information provided by recipients of limitation on appraised value agreements" if those recipients marked the information as confidential. Request Letter at 1. Sections 313.008(b) and 313.032(b) prohibit the Comptroller from including in the report information that is confidential by law, not information that is marked as confidential by a recipient of a limitation. TEX. TAX CODE ANN. §§ 313.008(b), .032(b) (Vernon 2008). We conclude, therefore, that the express terms of the statutory provisions prohibit only the inclusion of information which is confidential by law, a determination that the statutes implicitly leave to the Comptroller in the first instance.
SUMMARY
In preparing the report on limitation agreements under the Texas Economic Development Act, the Comptroller of Public Accounts may include more information than is required by sections 313.008 and 313.032 of the Tax Code if the information is reasonably necessary to assess the progress of such agreements.
The Comptroller may use in the report information provided by recipients of limitations, regardless of whether the information is marked as confidential by the recipients, so long as the information is not confidential by law. The Comptroller must, in the first instance, determine whether information is confidential by law.
ANDREW WEBER
First Assistant Attorney General
JONATHAN K. FRELS
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee
Christy Drake-Adams
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 2008 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.