🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TX DM-0050 October 21, 1991

Do audiology students need a hearing-aid license to make earmold impressions in Texas?

Short answer: No. The Attorney General concluded that an audiology student at an accredited college or university, who is measuring human hearing as part of the academic curriculum, may make impressions for earmolds used in hearing aids without getting a license or temporary training permit from the Texas Board of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Aids. The exemption comes with one condition: the student (or the student's employees) must not 'sell' hearing aids. The opinion distinguished an older 1982 opinion that had required a permit, explaining it applied to a different, narrower exemption for advanced-degree audiologists, not the broad student exemption at issue here.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority in Texas courts but are not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Statutes can be amended; verify current law before relying on anything here. Consult a licensed attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Texas AG Opinion DM-0050: Audiology Students Can Make Earmold Impressions Without a Hearing-Aid Permit

Plain-English summary

The chair of the State Committee of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology asked whether an audiology student at a college or university must obtain a temporary training permit from the Texas Board of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Aids in order to make impressions for earmolds used as parts of hearing aids. The Attorney General concluded no permit or license is required, as long as the student does not sell hearing aids.

The hearing-aid act (V.T.C.S. articles 4566-1.01 through 4566-1.22) normally requires anyone who fits and dispenses hearing aids to pass a board examination and be licensed, or to obtain a temporary training permit while preparing for the exam. The act's definition of fitting and dispensing expressly includes making impressions for earmolds. But article 4566-1.19(1) carves out an exemption: nothing in the act applies to persons measuring human hearing as part of the academic curriculum of an accredited institution of higher learning, provided they and their employees do not sell hearing aids. The opinion read that exemption to cover any activity those students perform, including making earmold impressions, so they need no board license or permit.

The opinion also addressed a 1982 opinion, MW-555, that a brief had cited for the opposite view. That earlier opinion concluded advanced-degree audiologists had to be licensed to make earmold impressions, because the separate exemption they relied on, subpart (3), at that time only covered "measurement of human hearing," which the act treated as a distinct activity from making impressions. (The Legislature later amended subpart (3) in 1983 to add earmold impressions.) The Attorney General explained that MW-555's analysis of subpart (3) did not apply to subpart (1), the student exemption, which is broader and exempts the listed students from the act for any activities they perform, again subject only to the no-selling condition.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1991. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. The hearing-aid fitting and dispensing statutes (then V.T.C.S. articles 4566-1.01 et seq.) and the audiology regulation provisions have since been recodified into the Occupations Code and amended. Verify current law before relying on any specific article number or exemption mentioned here.

Common questions

Does an audiology student need a hearing-aid permit to make earmold impressions?
No, not if the student is measuring human hearing as part of the academic curriculum at an accredited institution and neither the student nor the student's employees sell hearing aids. The opinion concluded the student exemption in article 4566-1.19(1) covers that activity.

What is the one condition on the exemption?
That the student, or the student's employees, do not "sell" hearing aids. The act defines a sale broadly to include transfers of title or the right to use by lease or other contract, and a prior opinion treated selling earmolds as component parts as selling hearing aids.

Doesn't an earlier opinion say a permit is required?
A 1982 opinion (MW-555) required a permit, but it dealt with a different, narrower exemption for advanced-degree audiologists (subpart (3)), which at that time did not list earmold impressions. The opinion held that reasoning does not apply to the broader student exemption in subpart (1).

Background and statutory framework

The act regulating the fitting and dispensing of hearing aids is V.T.C.S. articles 4566-1.01 through 4566-1.22. Article 4566-1.06 requires those who fit and dispense hearing aids to pass a board examination and be licensed, and article 4566-1.01(f) defines fitting and dispensing to include "the making of impressions for earmolds to be used as a part of the hearing aid." Article 4566-1.09 provides the temporary training permit for those who have not yet taken the examination. Article 4566-1.01(e) defines "sell" or "sale" to include a transfer of title or right to use by lease, bailment, or other contract, excluding wholesale manufacturer sales to licensed persons or distributors; Attorney General Opinion M-895 (1971) treated selling earmolds as component parts as selling hearing aids.

The exemption relied on is article 4566-1.19(1), covering persons measuring human hearing as part of the academic curriculum of an accredited institution of higher learning who do not sell hearing aids. The opinion contrasted this with subpart (3), the advanced-degree audiologist exemption analyzed in Attorney General Opinion MW-555 (1982), which at that time was limited to "measurement of human hearing" (citing Acts 1981, 67th Leg., ch. 774) and was later amended in 1983 to add earmold impressions (Acts 1983, 68th Leg., ch. 125; Bill Analysis, S.B. 1100, 68th Leg. (1983)). A footnote noted that article 4512j, regulating audiologists, defines the practice of audiology to include hearing measurement.

Citations

Statutory provisions:

  • V.T.C.S. article 4566-1.01(e) (definition of "sell"/"sale") and 4566-1.01(f) (definition of "fitting and dispensing hearing aids")
  • V.T.C.S. article 4566-1.06 (examination and licensing requirement)
  • V.T.C.S. article 4566-1.09 (temporary training permit)
  • V.T.C.S. article 4566-1.19 (exemptions, including subpart (1) student exemption and subpart (3) advanced-degree audiologist exemption)
  • V.T.C.S. article 4512j (regulation of audiologists)
  • Acts 1981, 67th Leg., ch. 774; Acts 1983, 68th Leg., ch. 125; S.B. 1100, 68th Leg. (1983)

Prior Attorney General opinions referenced: M-895 (1971), MW-555 (1982).

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain — the linked PDF is authoritative.

Office of the Attorney General
State of Texas

DAN MORALES
Attorney General

October 21, 1991

Ms. Susan Gay Dorsett
Chair
State Committee of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology
1100 West 49th Street
Austin, Texas 78756-3183

Opinion No. DM-50

Re: Whether audiology students at a college or university are required to obtain a temporary permit from the Texas Board of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Aids in order to make ear impressions (RQ-100)

Dear Ms. Dorsett:

You ask whether an audiology student at a college or university is required to obtain a temporary training permit from the Texas Board of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Aids (hereinafter, "the board") in order to make impressions for earmolds to be used as parts for hearing aids.

Articles 4566-1.01 through 4566-1.22, V.T.C.S., (hereinafter, "the act") provide for the regulation of the fitting and dispensing of hearing aids. Article 4566-1.06 provides that "[e]very person desiring to engage in fitting and dispensing hearing aids in the State of Texas shall be required to pass an examination given by the Texas Board of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Aids" and that those passing the examination and meeting other qualifications under the act "shall receive from the Board a license to fit and dispense hearing aids in this state." V.T.C.S. art. 4566-1.06(a), (e). For purposes of article 4566-1.06, "fitting and dispensing hearing aids" includes inter alia "the making of impressions for earmolds to be used as a part of the hearing aid." V.T.C.S. art. 4566-1.01(f).

The temporary training permit you refer to in your question is provided for in article 4566-1.09. That provision allows a person who has not taken the examination provided for in article 4566-1.06, but who obtains a temporary permit from the board, to fit and dispense hearing aids for a stated period of time or until he has passed the examination.

Article 4566-1.19 provides, in pertinent part:

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to apply to the following:

(1) Persons engaged in the practice of measuring human hearing as part of the academic curriculum of an accredited institution of higher learning, provided such persons or their employees do not sell hearing aids.

The above-quoted provisions of article 4566-1.19 on their face permit a student at an accredited institution of higher learning, who is there "engaged in the practice of measuring human hearing as part of the academic curricula" to make impressions for earmolds without being subject to board licensure or temporary permitting or to the other requirements of the act, so long as he or his employees do not "sell" hearing aids. Thus, if audiology students at such institutions are engaged in the practice of measuring human hearing as part of their academic curricula, they may make impressions for earmolds without board licensing or permitting, so long, again, as they or their employees do not "sell" hearing aids. See V.T.C.S. art. 4566-1.01(e) (defining "[s]ell" or "sale" to include "a transfer of title or of the right to use by lease, bailment, or any other contract," but not "sales at wholesale by manufacturers to persons licensed under this Act, or to distributors for distribution and sale to persons licensed under this Act"); see also Attorney General Opinion M-895 (1971) (an individual who sells earmolds for use as component parts of hearing aids is "selling hearing aids" for purposes of the act).

We note also that a brief received in connection with this request cites Attorney General Opinion MW-555 (1982) for the proposition that audiology students making impressions for earmolds must have a license or temporary permit from the board. That opinion concluded, based on the provisions of subpart (3) of article 4566-1.19 then in effect, that individuals with master's or doctorate degrees in audiology were nevertheless subject to the licensure and other provisions of the act if they made impressions for earmolds to be used as parts of hearing aids.[1] At the time Attorney General Opinion MW-555 dealt with it, subpart (3) read:

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to apply to the following:

. . . .

(3) An individual with a master's or doctorate degree in audiology from an accredited college or university may engage in the measurement of human hearing by the use of an audiometer or by any means for the purpose of making selections and adaptations of or recommendations for a hearing aid, provided such persons do not sell hearing aids.

See Acts 1981, 67th Leg., ch. 774, at 2910.

Attorney General Opinion MW-555 pointed out that article 4566-1.06 required persons engaged in "fitting and dispensing hearing aids" to be licensed or temporarily permitted by the board, and that article 4566-1.01(f) provided:

"Fitting and Dispensing hearing aids" means the measurement of human hearing by the use of an audiometer or by any means for the purpose of making selections, adaptations and/or sales of hearing aids. The term also includes the sale of hearing aids, and the making of impressions for earmolds to be used as a part of the hearing aid.

The opinion reasoned that the provisions of subpart (3) then in effect only permitted the advanced degreed individuals described there to "engage in the measurement of human hearing," and that the above-quoted article 4566-1.01(f) definition of "fitting and dispensing hearing aids" indicated that "making impressions for earmolds" was a distinct activity from the "measurement of human hearing," and was not covered by the subpart (3) exemption.

In response to Attorney General Opinion MW-555, the legislature amended subpart (3) of article 4566-1.19 to its present form in 1983 by adding the language "and the making of impressions for earmolds to be used as part of a hearing aid." Acts 1983, 68th Leg., ch. 125, at 598; see also Bill Analysis, S.B. 1100, 68th Leg. (1983).

Subpart (3) of article 4566-1.19 both as originally adopted and as amended in 1983 is grammatically problematical when considered with the first sentence of the article. ("Nothing in this Act shall be construed to apply to the following: . . . An individual with a master's or doctorate degree in audiology . . . may engage in the measurement of human hearing . . . and the making of impressions for earmolds . . . .") Nevertheless, we think subpart (3), despite the grammar problem, clearly operates as express permission for the audiologists described there to engage in only such activities as are enumerated there without being subject to the licensing, permitting, or other requirements of the act. Attorney General Opinion MW-555 concluded that making impressions for earmolds was not, at that time, one of those enumerated activities. Subpart (1), in contrast, exempts students engaged in the study of human hearing at certain institutions from the requirements of the act for any activities they engage in, so long as they do not sell hearing aids. Therefore, we do not think the analysis of subpart (3) of article 4566-1.19 in Attorney General Opinion MW-555, which concluded that making earmolds was not one of the permitted activities under subpart (3), is applicable to subpart (1), which again permits the individuals described there to engage in any activities without being subject to the act, so long as they do not "sell" hearing aids.

Accordingly, we conclude in response to your question that pursuant to the exemption in article 4566-1.19(1), audiology students engaged in the practice of measuring human hearing as a part of the academic curriculum of an accredited institution of higher learning may make impressions for earmolds to be used as parts in hearing aids without having obtained a license or temporary permit from the Board of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Aids, so long as the students or their employees do not "sell" hearing aids.

SUMMARY

Pursuant to the exemption in V.T.C.S. article 4566-1.19(1), audiology students engaged in the practice of measuring human hearing as a part of the academic curriculum of an accredited institution of higher learning may make impressions for earmolds to be used as parts in hearing aids without having obtained a license or temporary permit from the Board of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Aids, so long as the students or their employees do not "sell" hearing aids.

DAN MORALES
Attorney General of Texas

WILL PRYOR
First Assistant Attorney General

MARY KELLER
Executive Assistant Attorney General

JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY (Ret.)
Special Assistant Attorney General

RENEA HICKS
Special Assistant Attorney General

MADELEINE B. JOHNSON
Chair, Opinion Committee

Prepared by William Walker
Assistant Attorney General


[1] We note that article 4512j, which provides for regulation of audiologists, in section 2, subsection (8), defines "[t]he practice of audiology" to include hearing measurement.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1991 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.