🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TN Opinion No. 16-03 February 4, 2016

Can a Tennessee driver be sent to jail for a misdemeanor traffic violation under § 55-8-197 that causes serious bodily injury or death, or is the punishment limited to fines?

Short answer: Fines only. Punishment for a Class A or Class B misdemeanor under Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-8-197 was limited to the fines specifically provided in subsection (c) ($250 for serious bodily injury; $500 for death). Imprisonment under the general misdemeanor-sentencing statute § 40-35-111(e) was not available because the specific punishment in § 55-8-197(c) controlled over the general one.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2016. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Tennessee law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2016
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Tennessee Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Tennessee attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Representative Bill Beck asked the AG's office a simple statutory-construction question with real consequences for traffic prosecutions. Tennessee Code Annotated § 55-8-197 makes certain traffic-accident misdemeanors that result in serious bodily injury or death subject to specified fines, $250 for serious bodily injury (Class B misdemeanor) and $500 for death (Class A misdemeanor). The general misdemeanor-sentencing statute, § 40-35-111(e), authorizes imprisonment of up to 11 months 29 days for a Class A misdemeanor and up to 6 months for a Class B. Could a defendant convicted under § 55-8-197 be sent to jail under the general statute?

The AG's office said no. Two doctrines drove the result. First, § 40-35-111(e) expressly says its punishments apply "unless otherwise provided by statute," and § 55-8-197(c) plainly provides otherwise. Second, even without that express override, Tennessee's specific-controls-general canon would direct the same conclusion: when two statutes in apparent conflict address the same conduct, the more specific provision governs. Section 55-8-197(c)'s injury- and fatality-specific fines were the specific provision; § 40-35-111(e)'s default misdemeanor terms were the general one.

The punishment for a § 55-8-197 conviction was therefore limited to the statutory fine, with no possibility of imprisonment. The opinion was careful to note this was a pure statutory-construction question; it did not address whether the punishment scheme was constitutionally appropriate for the underlying conduct.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2016. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Background and statutory framework

Tennessee criminal sentencing distinguishes between the general default rules in Title 40, Chapter 35 (the Criminal Sentencing Reform Act of 1989) and the specific punishment provisions that some offense statutes carry. Section 40-35-111(e) sets the default for misdemeanor terms:

  • Class A misdemeanor: up to 11 months 29 days, or fine not to exceed $2,500, or both, "unless otherwise provided by statute."
  • Class B misdemeanor: up to 6 months, or fine not to exceed $500, or both, "unless otherwise provided by statute."

The "unless otherwise provided by statute" hook is the key. It tells courts to look outside Title 40, Chapter 35 if another statute fixes a different punishment for a specific offense.

Section 55-8-197 is one of those other statutes. Subsection (c)(1) makes a violation of subsection (a) a Class B misdemeanor punishable by a $250 fine when the accident results in serious bodily injury. Subsection (c)(2) makes it a Class A misdemeanor punishable by a $500 fine when the accident results in death. Neither subsection mentions imprisonment.

Tennessee's statutory-construction canons resolve the apparent tension cleanly:

  • Plain meaning controls. Brown v. Erachem Comilog, Inc., 231 S.W.3d 918, 921 (Tenn. 2007). The text of § 55-8-197(c) lists only fines.
  • Harmonization preferred. State v. Turner, 193 S.W.3d 522, 526 (Tenn. 2006); In re Akins, 87 S.W.3d 488, 493 (Tenn. 2002). Statutes on the same subject should be read together if possible.
  • Specific over general. Turner, 193 S.W.3d at 526; Arnwine v. Union County Bd. of Educ., 120 S.W.3d 804, 809 (Tenn. 2003). Where two statutes conflict, the specific controls the general.

Applying those three canons, § 55-8-197(c)'s injury-keyed fines won out. The opinion's conclusion was that a § 55-8-197 conviction yields the fine and only the fine.

Common questions

Q: At the time of this opinion, could a court sentence a § 55-8-197 defendant to any jail time?
A: No. The opinion read the statutes together to mean the punishment was limited to the specific fine in subsection (c), and excluded the imprisonment options in § 40-35-111(e).

Q: What were the specific fines under § 55-8-197(c)?
A: $250 for a Class B misdemeanor where the accident caused serious bodily injury (subsection (c)(1)); $500 for a Class A misdemeanor where the accident caused death (subsection (c)(2)).

Q: Why did the general statute (§ 40-35-111(e)) not control?
A: Two reasons. First, its own text said its punishments apply only "unless otherwise provided by statute," and § 55-8-197(c) provided otherwise. Second, when a specific punishment statute and a general one address the same offense, Tennessee canons (e.g., State v. Turner) hold that the specific controls.

Q: Was the opinion saying these are not serious offenses?
A: No. It was a statutory-construction reading, not a policy judgment. The opinion expressly did not address whether the punishment was appropriate; that is a legislative question.

Q: Could a defendant in this situation still face other consequences?
A: The opinion did not address collateral consequences (license suspension, civil liability, restitution). Those typically flow from separate statutes and were outside the question presented.

Citations and references

Statutes:

Cases:

  • State v. Turner, 193 S.W.3d 522 (Tenn. 2006) (Tennessee Supreme Court, specific over general)
  • State v. Davis, 173 S.W.3d 411 (Tenn. 2005) (Tennessee Supreme Court)
  • Brown v. Erachem Comilog, Inc., 231 S.W.3d 918 (Tenn. 2007) (Tennessee Supreme Court, plain-meaning canon)
  • In re Akins, 87 S.W.3d 488 (Tenn. 2002) (Tennessee Supreme Court, harmonization)
  • Arnwine v. Union County Bd. of Educ., 120 S.W.3d 804 (Tenn. 2003) (Tennessee Supreme Court, specific over general)

Source

Original opinion text

STATE OF TENNESSEE
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
February 4, 2016
Opinion No. 16-03
Authorized punishments for violation of Tennessee Code Annotated § 55-8-197

Question
Is the punishment for a conviction of a Class A or B misdemeanor under Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-8-197 limited to the fines provided in Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-8-197(c), or could a person convicted of an offense under § 55-8-197 be sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-111(e)?

Opinion
Yes, punishment for a conviction of a Class A or B misdemeanor under Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-8-197 is limited to the fines provided in Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-8-197(c).

ANALYSIS

Tennessee Code Annotated § 40-35-111(e) provides generally for punishments for Class A and Class B misdemeanors:

(e) The authorized terms of imprisonment and fines for misdemeanors are:
(1) Class A misdemeanor, not greater than eleven (11) months, twenty-nine (29) days or a fine not to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or both, unless otherwise provided by statute;
(2) Class B misdemeanor, not greater than six (6) months or a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500), or both, unless otherwise provided by statute[.]

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-111(e)(1) & (2) (emphasis added). The emphasized language "unless otherwise provided by statute" plainly allows for the possibility that another statute could vary the punishments for certain Class A and Class B misdemeanors. See State v. Turner, 193 S.W.3d 522, 527 (Tenn. 2006).

Another statute does, in fact, provide "otherwise" in the context of Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-8-197, which makes certain traffic violations that result in serious bodily injury or death misdemeanors. The punishments specified for those particular misdemeanors are fines, with the class of the misdemeanor and the amount of the fine dependent on whether the accident results in bodily injury or whether it results in death:

(c)(1) A violation of subsection (a) is a class B misdemeanor punishable by a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) if the accident results in serious bodily injury of another.
(2) A violation of subsection (a) is a class A misdemeanor punishable by a fine of five hundred dollars ($500) if the accident results in the death of another.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-8-197(c)(1) & (2). Thus, these two specific misdemeanors are punishable by fines and not by imprisonment, contrary to the punishment provisions for misdemeanors in general.

A basic principle of statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to legislative intent without unduly restricting or expanding a statute's intended coverage. State v. Turner, 193 S.W.3d 522, 526 (Tenn. 2006) (citing State v. Davis, 173 S.W.3d 411, 413-14 (Tenn. 2005)). If a statute is clear and unambiguous, courts will find that intent in the plain and ordinary meaning of its language. Brown v. Erachem Comilog, Inc., 231 S.W.3d 918, 921 (Tenn. 2007). Statutes on the same subject must be construed together harmoniously, so that they do not conflict. Turner, 193 S.W.3d at 526 (citing In re Akins, 87 S.W.3d 488, 493 (Tenn. 2002)). Specific statutory language will control over a general conflicting statutory provision. Id. (citing Arnwine v. Union County Bd. of Educ., 120 S.W.3d 804, 809 (Tenn. 2003)).

The plain meaning of Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-111(e) is that the punishments for misdemeanors set forth in that statute apply unless another statute provides for different punishments. In other words, Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-111(e) provides the default for punishments for misdemeanors in general absent some different statutory provision for a specific misdemeanor. Tennessee Code Annotated § 55-8-197(c)(1) and (2) do in fact provide different punishments specifically for misdemeanor violations under that statute. Even if Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-111(e) did not expressly contemplate that a different punishment could be authorized by another statute, the two seemingly conflicting statutes, § 40-35-111(e) and § 55-8-197(c), are easily harmonized, because the specific provision controls the more general. Accordingly, the punishments specified in § 55-8-197 are the applicable punishments for violations of that statute and they are, by the plain language of the statute, limited to fines; they do not include imprisonment.

HERBERT H. SLATERY III
Attorney General and Reporter

ANDRÉE SOPHIA BLUMSTEIN
Solicitor General

KATHARINE K. DECKER
Assistant Attorney General

Requested by:
The Honorable Bill Beck
State Representative
24 Legislative Plaza
Nashville, TN 37243

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2016 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Tennessee statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.