🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
TN Opinion No. 15-41 April 24, 2015

Can the county legislative body force its uniform pay plan on employees of the County Assessor of Property's office?

Short answer: No, with one exception. The Assessor controls hiring and pay for her own staff within the budget the county appropriates. The county legislative body only sets pay for a secretary in counties too small for a deputy assessor.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2015. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Tennessee law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2015
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Tennessee Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Tennessee attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Subject

Opinion No. 15-41, Authority of a County Assessor of Property to Hire and Compensate Office Employees, April 24, 2015

Plain-English summary

A state representative asked whether a county can impose its uniform employee compensation plan on the office of an elected County Assessor of Property. The AG said no. The County Assessor is an elected constitutional county officer (Tenn. Const. art. VII, § 1) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506 gives the Assessor exclusive authority over hiring her own employees, setting their compensation, and creating positions, all within the budget that the county legislative body appropriates for the Assessor's office.

The county legislative body has only one specific role in this area, and it kicks in for small counties only. In counties where the Assessor has too few parcels to qualify for even a single deputy assessor, the Assessor may employ a secretary only with the legislative body's approval, and the body sets that secretary's compensation. Once that secretary is approved, any additional staff and their pay are still the Assessor's call, subject to the appropriated budget. The county controls the office's funding. The Assessor controls everything else about staffing.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2015. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Why does this even come up?

Counties often want to apply a uniform compensation plan across all county employees to keep pay comparable, give the county leverage in budgeting, and avoid one office paying its staff dramatically more than another. But Tennessee's elected county officers (Sheriff, Trustee, Register, County Clerk, Assessor) sit in constitutional offices, and the General Assembly has given some of them statutory authority to make hiring decisions within their appropriated budgets. The Assessor is one of those officers under Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506.

So how does the county actually control assessor staffing?

Through the budget. The county legislative body sets the appropriation for the Assessor's office. If that appropriation is tight, the Assessor cannot hire as many people, or cannot pay them as much. The county does not get to choose which positions exist or what they pay, but it controls how much money is on the table.

What's the deputy-assessor threshold?

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(a)(1) lets the Assessor appoint at least one deputy assessor for every 4,500 parcels (after the first 4,500). The state Division of Property Assessments verifies the parcel count. In small counties without enough parcels to trigger that allowance, subsection (b)(1) governs, and the Assessor can ask the legislative body to approve a secretary instead.

Where does this leave county HR offices?

The county can run general HR functions, payroll, and benefit administration for Assessor employees. It cannot dictate position classifications, pay grades, or pay-plan compliance over the Assessor's objection. The AG cites Pharris v. Looper, a federal district court decision recognizing that the Assessor has "final decision making authority regarding the employment of personnel in his office."

Does the same rule apply to other constitutional county offices?

Each office has its own enabling statute. The Sheriff, Trustee, Register, and County Clerk are each constitutional county officers under Article VII, § 1, and Tennessee courts have generally recognized broad authority for those officers over their internal staffing too, but the precise statutory mechanics differ. This opinion addresses the Assessor specifically.

Background and statutory framework

The Tennessee Constitution lists the County Assessor of Property as one of the elected county officers under Article VII, § 1. Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-1-506 governs the Assessor's authority to staff her office:

  • Subsection (a)(1) lets the Assessor appoint at least one deputy assessor for every 4,500 parcels of property beyond the first 4,500 in the assessor's jurisdiction.
  • Subsection (b)(1) governs counties too small to qualify for any deputy assessor. There the Assessor may employ a secretary only with county legislative body approval, and the body sets the secretary's compensation.
  • Subsection (b)(2) lets the Assessor employ such additional staff as she deems necessary, and establish rates of compensation, "within the appropriation established for the assessor's office by the county legislative body."

The county legislative body's role is funding (the budget). It has no statutory authority to review the Assessor's specific employment decisions. Pharris v. Looper, 6 F. Supp. 2d 720, 729 (M.D. Tenn. 1998), confirmed that the Assessor has "final decision making authority regarding the employment of personnel in his office." State ex rel. Winstead v. Moody, 596 S.W.2d 811, 813 (Tenn. 1980), confirms that officers elected under Article VII, § 1, work under county authority but pursuant to the statutory framework the General Assembly has established.

Citations

  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(a)(1) (deputy assessor entitlement)
  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(b)(1) (secretary, with legislative body approval, in small counties)
  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(b)(2) (additional staff and compensation, within appropriation)
  • Tenn. Const. Article VII, § 1 (elected county officers)
  • Pharris v. Looper, 6 F. Supp. 2d 720 (M.D. Tenn. 1998)
  • State ex rel. Winstead v. Moody, 596 S.W.2d 811 (Tenn. 1980)

Source

Original opinion text

STATE OF TENNESSEE
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
April 24, 2015
Opinion No. 15-41
Authority of a County Assessor of Property to Hire and Compensate Office Employees

Question 1

Does a county Assessor of Property have the authority to determine the number and compensation of the employees in his or her office, within the funds appropriated for that purpose by the county legislative body?

Opinion 1

Yes, except when an Assessor of Property needs approval from the county legislative body to employ and compensate a secretary in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(b)(1).

Question 2

Is the county legislative body authorized to adopt a compensation plan and make it mandatorily applicable to employees in the office of the Assessor of Property?

Opinion 2

No, except when the county legislative body's approval is required to employ and set compensation for a secretary in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(b)(1).

Question 3

What authority does the county have to require compliance with this compensation plan with regard to employees of the Assessor of Property?

Opinion 3

See Opinion 2. The county does not have the authority to adopt and enforce a compensation plan for employees of the Assessor of Property, except when the county legislative body's approval is required to employ and set compensation for a secretary in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(b)(1).

Question 4

If the county is authorized to adopt and enforce such a compensation plan, would creation of positions and determination of pay grades for employees in the office of the Assessor of Property be at the discretion of the Assessor of Property?

Opinion 4

See Opinions 2 and 3. The county does not have the authority to adopt and enforce a compensation plan for employees of the Assessor of Property, except when the county legislative body's approval is required to employ and set compensation for a secretary in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(b)(1). The Assessor of Property therefore has discretion to create positions and determine pay grades for employees within the limits established by Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506 and the budgetary constraints imposed by the county legislative body.

Question 5

Does the county legislative body or the county mayor, or any other county official, have approval authority over the creation of new positions and the compensation of those employees within the office of the Assessor of Property, other than budgetary authority?

Opinion 5

No, except to the extent that the county legislative body's approval is required to employ and set compensation for a secretary in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(b)(1).

ANALYSIS

The authority of a county Assessor of Property to employ staff is governed by Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506, which states in relevant part:

(a)(1) In order to assure that each county assessor of property shall have a minimum staff to assist the county assessor in carrying out the duties and responsibilities required by law, the assessor is authorized to appoint at least one (1) deputy assessor for each four thousand five hundred (4,500) parcels of property, as determined by the division of property assessments, over and above the first four thousand five hundred (4,500) parcels of property within the assessor's taxing jurisdiction.

[. . .]

(b)(1) In any county where the assessor does not qualify for a deputy assessor under this section, the assessor is authorized, with the approval of the county legislative body, to employ or appoint a secretary to assist the assessor in the operation of the assessor's office. The compensation of such secretary shall be fixed by the county legislative body and paid out of county funds.

(b)(2) The assessor shall employ such additional staff as the assessor deems necessary and establish rates of compensation for all employees within the appropriation established for the assessor's office by the county legislative body.

Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 67-1-506(a)(1), 67-1-506(b)(1)-(b)(2).

The office of Assessor of Property is a constitutional county office. "The qualified voters of each county shall elect for terms of four years a legislative body, a county executive, a Sheriff, a Trustee, a Register, a County Clerk and an Assessor of Property." Tenn. Const. Article VII, § 1 (emphasis added). Offices commissioned by Article VII, § 1, of the Tennessee Constitution are county offices. The officials elected for those offices work under county authority. State ex rel. Winstead v. Moody, 596 S.W.2d 811, 813 (Tenn. 1980). The county legislative body funds the office of the Assessor of Property by determining the office's budget in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506. In that respect, the county legislative body has the authority to regulate the funding necessary for the Assessor of Property to carry out his or her duties as required by law.

Although the office of Assessor of Property is a constitutional county office and the county legislative body is granted the authority to fund that office under Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506, no statutory provision grants "any governing body the authority to review the assessor's employment decisions." Pharris v. Looper, 6 F. Supp. 2d 720, 729 (M.D. Tenn. 1998). Likewise, no statutory provision grants any other county official such authority. Nevertheless, the budgetary constraints imposed by the county legislative body will impact the ability of an Assessor of Property to employ staff.

In counties where Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(a)(1) applies, an Assessor of Property has statutory authority to employ "a minimum staff," including deputy assessor(s), as well as to determine the level and amount of compensation for staff from the funds provided by the county legislative body as part of the overall budget of the office. Since an Assessor of Property has singular authority under this section to employ staff, the Assessor "must also be authorized to make all employment decisions concerning them." Pharris, 6 F. Supp. 2d at 729. Determining compensation for staff is an employment decision that falls within the statutory authority of an Assessor of Property.

In counties where Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(b)(1) applies, an Assessor of Property may appoint a secretary only after approval by the county legislative body. The county legislative body also sets the secretary's compensation. Id. Once an Assessor receives approval from the county legislative body to employ a secretary in accordance with subsection (b)(1), the Assessor selects the individual for employment. See Pharris, 6 F. Supp. 2d at 729 (recognizing that the Assessor has "final decision making authority regarding the employment of personnel in his office"). Under Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506(b)(2), the Assessor maintains exclusive authority to employ additional staff and establish compensation for the additional staff "within the appropriation established for the assessor's office by the county legislative body." The Assessor of Property therefore has discretion to employ and to establish compensation for additional staff under subsection (b)(2), but this discretion is limited by the budgetary constraints of the appropriation the office receives from the county legislative body. Id.

HERBERT H. SLATERY III
Attorney General and Reporter

ANDRÉE SOPHIA BLUMSTEIN
Solicitor General

RACHEL HARMON
Senior Counsel

Requested by:
The Honorable Michael J. Sparks
State Representative
207 War Memorial Building
Nashville, TN 37243

Footnote: An historical search of the text of Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-1-506 confirms that the language of the statute has not changed since the decision in Pharris v. Looper, 6 F. Supp. 2d 720, 729 (M.D. Tenn. 1998).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2015 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Tennessee statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.