🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
MO Opinion No. 64-2019 April 1, 2019

Did the Missouri AG approve the form of the Heidi Miller initiative petition to amend Chapter 208 (2020-053)?

Short answer: Yes. The Missouri AG approved the form of Heidi Miller's initiative petition (2020-053), which proposed to amend Chapter 208, Revised Statutes of Missouri (which governs public assistance and Medicaid). Approval is procedural form review only, not a determination of substantive sufficiency. The Secretary of State retains final authority under § 116.332.4.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2019. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Missouri law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2019
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Missouri Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Missouri attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Attorney General Eric Schmitt approved the form of Heidi Miller's initiative petition (designated 2020-053), which proposed amendments to Chapter 208, Revised Statutes of Missouri. Chapter 208 is the public-assistance chapter of Missouri statutes; it covers Medicaid (MO HealthNet), Temporary Assistance, child-welfare assistance, and similar programs. The 2019-2020 initiative cycle in Missouri included a Medicaid-expansion drive that ultimately produced Amendment 2 (approved by voters in August 2020), and several Miller-filed Chapter 208 petitions were part of that picture.

Approval is form-review only. The petition cleared the structural and formatting requirements set by Chapter 116. Substantive review (whether the proposed text would survive a constitutional challenge, whether it amounted to a single subject, whether it conflicted with federal law) is not part of the AG's § 116.332 task. § 116.332 leaves final form authority with the Secretary of State, who can still reject the petition.

This approval pairs with Opinion No. 63-2019, which rejected Miller's parallel Article IV constitutional petition on form grounds. So the statutory half of the package cleared while the constitutional half did not.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2019. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

What does Chapter 208 cover?

Chapter 208 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri governs public-assistance programs, including MO HealthNet (Medicaid), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, child-welfare assistance, and program administration. Initiative drives targeting Medicaid expansion in 2019-2020 commonly proposed amendments to Chapter 208.

What does form-approval mean in this context?

It means the petition complies with the structural and layout requirements of Chapter 116 (the chapter that governs initiative-petition procedure). It does not mean the substance has been blessed.

Who has the final say on form?

§ 116.332 reserves it to the Secretary of State. The AG advises; the Secretary decides. In practice the Secretary follows the AG.

What happened next in the 2019-2020 Medicaid initiative cycle?

A separate Medicaid-expansion measure (Amendment 2) reached the August 2020 ballot and was approved by Missouri voters, adding Medicaid expansion to the state constitution as Mo. Const. art. IV, § 36(c). Whether this specific Miller petition (2020-053) made it to circulation, gathered signatures, or appeared on the ballot is not addressed by the form-review opinion.

What was different about the Article IV petition that got rejected (Opinion No. 63-2019)?

The Article IV petition failed on form. The Chapter 208 petition's form was acceptable. Form review is mechanical; substantive consistency between the two petitions was not the AG's concern.

Background and statutory framework

Missouri's initiative-petition process is in Chapter 116. § 116.332 sets out AG form review and reserves the final form decision to the Secretary of State. The initiative process for statutory measures is grounded in Mo. Const. art. III, §§ 49-53. Chapter 208 of RSMo is the public-assistance code, including MO HealthNet (Missouri Medicaid).

Citations

  • § 116.332, RSMo (AG form review of initiative petitions; Secretary of State has final authority on form)
  • Chapter 208, RSMo (the chapter the petition proposed to amend; covers MO HealthNet and public assistance)
  • Mo. Const. art. III, §§ 49 to 53 (initiative and referendum process)
  • Initiative Petition 2020-053 (Miller, Chapter 208)
  • Op. Mo. Att'y Gen. 63-2019 (Miller's parallel Article IV constitutional petition, rejected as to form)

Source

Original opinion text

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI
ERIC SCHMITT
JEFFERSON CITY
ATTORNEY GENERAL
65102
P.O. Box 899
(573) 751-3321

April 1, 2019

OPINION LETTER NO. 64-2019

The Honorable John R. Ashcroft
Missouri Secretary of State
James C. Kirkpatrick State Information Center
600 West Main Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101

Dear Secretary Ashcroft:

This opinion letter responds to your request dated March 22, 2019 for our review under § 116.332, RSMo, of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition to amend Chapter 208, Revised Statutes of Missouri, submitted by Heidi Miller (2020-053).

We approve the petition as to form, but § 116.332 gives the Secretary of State final authority to approve or reject the petition. Therefore, our approval of the form of the petition does not preclude you from rejecting the petition.

Because our review of the petition is simply for the purpose of determining sufficiency as to form, the fact that we do not reject the petition is not to be construed as a determination that the petition is sufficient as to substance. Likewise, because our review is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the petition or of the objectives of its proponents, or the expression of any view respecting the adequacy or inadequacy of the petition generally.

Very truly yours,

ERIC S. SCHMITT
Attorney General

OP-2019-0064

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2019 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Missouri statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.