🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
MO Opinion No. 55-2025 May 12, 2025

Did Missouri approve the summary statement for treating manufacturer order locations as motor vehicle dealerships?

Short answer: Yes. The attorney general approved the proposed summary statement's legal content and form; it described applying dealership franchise laws to manufacturer locations that market, process, or take orders for new vehicles.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2025. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Missouri law, with citations.

Disclaimer: This is an official Missouri Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Missouri attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey approved the legal content and form of the proposed summary statement for Bradley Ketcher's initiative petition 2026-037. The statement described treating any manufacturer-operated location that markets, processes, or takes orders for new motor vehicles as a dealership subject to franchise laws. It also stated that the proposal aimed to prevent manufacturers from circumventing dealership regulations.

The review was limited to the summary statement under § 116.334, RSMo. The opinion did not endorse the petition or express a view about its objectives.

What this means for you

Motor vehicle dealers and manufacturers

The reviewed statement described extending dealership status and franchise-law coverage to certain manufacturer-operated locations. The opinion addressed the statement's legal content and form, not the proposal's merits.

Missouri voters

The statement framed the proposal as preventing manufacturers from avoiding dealership regulations. The attorney general did not endorse that objective.

Election lawyers and ballot-measure researchers

Opinion 55-2025 records the summary-statement approval for the motor vehicle dealership proposal.

Common questions

Q: Which manufacturer locations did the statement cover?
A: Locations that market and process or take orders for new motor vehicles.

Q: What legal status would those locations have?
A: The statement described them as dealerships subject to franchise laws.

Q: Did the attorney general endorse the proposal?
A: No. The opinion approved the summary statement's legal content and form and expressly disclaimed endorsement.

Background and statutory framework

The Missouri Secretary of State requested review on May 2, 2025. The attorney general reviewed the proposed summary statement under § 116.334, RSMo and approved it on May 12, 2025.

Citations and references

Statute: § 116.334, RSMo.

Source

Original opinion text

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI
ANDREW BAILEY

May 12, 2025

OPINION LETTER NO. 55-2025

The Honorable Denny Hoskins
Missouri Secretary of State
James C. Kirkpatrick State Information Center
600 West Main Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101

Dear Secretary Hoskins:

This opinion letter responds to your request dated May 2, 2025 for our review under § 116.334, RSMo of a proposed summary statement prepared for the petition submitted by Bradley Ketcher, 2026-037. The proposed summary statement is as follows:

Do you want to amend Missouri law to:

• define any location operated by a motor vehicle manufacturer that markets and processes or takes orders for new motor vehicles as a dealership subject to franchise laws; and

• state that the intent of the law is to prevent manufacturers from circumventing dealership regulations?

Pursuant to § 116.334, RSMo, we approve the legal content and form of the proposed statement. Because our review of the statement is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the petition, nor as the expression of any view regarding the objectives of its proponents.

Very truly yours,

ANDREW BAILEY
Attorney General

OP-2025-061

Supreme Court Building
207 W. High Street
P.O. Box 899
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: (573) 751-3321
Fax: (573) 751-0774
www.ago.mo.gov

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2025 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Missouri statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.