🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
MO Opinion No. 30-2025 February 4, 2025

Did Missouri approve the summary statement for initiative petition 2026-014?

Short answer: Yes. The attorney general approved the proposed summary statement's legal content and form; it addressed initiative protections, an 80 percent legislative threshold, election timing, and ballot-summary wording.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2025. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Missouri law, with citations.

Disclaimer: This is an official Missouri Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Missouri attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey approved the legal content and form of the proposed summary statement for initiative petition 2026-014. The statement described protections for citizens' direct lawmaking power, an 80 percent House and Senate threshold for changing citizen initiatives, general-election voting unless the same threshold approved a special election, and a requirement that ballot summaries be clear, unbiased, fair, accurate, and use ballot-measure language when possible.

The review was limited to the summary statement under § 116.334, RSMo. The opinion did not endorse the petition or express a view about its objectives.

What this means for you

Initiative petition proponents

The summary statement for petition 2026-014 passed the attorney general's legal-content-and-form review. The opinion did not decide whether the proposal itself should be adopted.

Missouri voters

The reviewed statement described changes to initiative protections, election timing, and ballot-summary wording. The opinion addressed the statement's legal content and form, not the proposal's merits.

Missouri election officials

Opinion 30-2025 completed the attorney general's summary-statement review under § 116.334, RSMo and expressly disclaimed endorsement.

Common questions

Q: What vote threshold did the statement describe for changing citizen initiatives?
A: Eighty percent of both the House and Senate.

Q: When would ballot measures be decided?
A: At a general election, unless eighty percent of both legislative chambers approved a special election.

Q: What standard did the proposal set for ballot summaries?
A: They would have to be clear, unbiased, fair, and accurate and, when possible, use only language found in the ballot measure.

Background and statutory framework

The Missouri Secretary of State requested review on January 23, 2025. The attorney general reviewed the proposed summary statement for petition 2026-014 under § 116.334, RSMo and approved its legal content and form on February 4, 2025.

The opinion identifies the petition submitter only as “Submitted By,” so this page does not assign the petition to a named proponent.

Citations and references

Statute: § 116.334, RSMo.

Source

Original opinion text

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI
ANDREW BAILEY

February 4, 2025

OPINION LETTER NO. 30-2025

The Honorable Denny Hoskins
Missouri Secretary of State
James C. Kirkpatrick State Information Center
600 West Main Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101

Dear Secretary Hoskins:

This opinion letter responds to your request dated January 23, 2025 for our review under § 116.334, RSMo of a proposed summary statement prepared for the petition submitted by Submitted By, 2026-014. The proposed summary statement is as follows:

Do you want to amend the Missouri Constitution to:

• prohibit the legislature from weakening citizens' direct lawmaking power;

• prohibit the legislature from attempting to change any citizen-initiated law or citizen-initiated amendment, except in the event that eighty percent of the House and Senate approve the change;

• require that every ballot measure be decided at a general election, except in the event that eighty percent of the House and Senate approve a special election for the measure; and

• require that every ballot summary be clear, unbiased, fair, and accurate, and, when possible, use only language found in the ballot measure??

Pursuant to § 116.334, RSMo, we approve the legal content and form of the proposed statement. Because our review of the statement is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the petition, nor as the expression of any view regarding the objectives of its proponents.

Very truly yours,

ANDREW BAILEY
Attorney General

OP-2025-030

Supreme Court Building
207 W. High Street
P.O. Box 899
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: (573) 751-3321
Fax: (573) 751-0774
www.ago.mo.gov

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2025 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Missouri statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.