Did Missouri approve the form of Jamie Howard's initiative petition 2026-105?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2025. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Missouri law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey approved Jamie Howard's initiative petition 2026-105 as sufficient as to form. The official letter identified the proposal as an amendment to Article III.
The approval was limited. Under § 116.332, RSMo, the secretary of state retained final authority to approve or reject the petition. The opinion also said that form approval did not decide substantive sufficiency or endorse the petition's objectives.
What this means for you
Initiative petition proponents
Petition 2026-105 passed the attorney general's form review under § 116.332, RSMo. The opinion did not decide whether the proposal was substantively sufficient.
Missouri election officials
The attorney general's form approval did not remove the secretary of state's final authority to approve or reject the petition.
Election lawyers and ballot-measure researchers
Opinion 164-2025 records a form-sufficiency approval for petition 2026-105 and expressly limits the effect of that approval.
Common questions
Q: Was Jamie Howard's petition 2026-105 approved as to form?
A: Yes. The attorney general approved it as sufficient as to form.
Q: Could the secretary of state still reject the petition?
A: Yes. The opinion said § 116.332 gave the secretary of state final authority to approve or reject it.
Q: Did the opinion decide whether the proposal was substantively sufficient?
A: No. The attorney general expressly declined to treat form approval as a substantive determination.
Background and statutory framework
The Missouri Secretary of State requested review on July 21, 2025. The official letter identified the proposal as an Article III amendment and as petition 2026-105.
The attorney general reviewed sufficiency as to form under § 116.332, RSMo and issued the approval on July 31, 2025. The opinion preserved the secretary of state's final approval authority.
Citations and references
Statute: § 116.332, RSMo.
Source
- Landing page: https://ago.mo.gov/other-resources/ag-opinions/
- Original PDF: https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/164-2025.pdf
Original opinion text
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI
ANDREW BAILEY
July 31, 2025
OPINION LETTER NO. 164-2025
The Honorable Denny Hoskins
Missouri Secretary of State
James C. Kirkpatrick State Information Center
600 West Main Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Dear Secretary Hoskins:
This opinion letter responds to your request dated July 21, 2025 for our review under § 116.332, RSMo of the sufficiency as to form of an initiative petition to amend Article III, Revised Statutes of Missouri, submitted by Jamie Howard, 2026-105.
We approve the petition as to form, but § 116.332 gives the Secretary of State final authority to approve or reject the petition. Therefore, our approval of the form of the petition does not preclude you from rejecting the petition.
Because our review of the petition is simply for the purpose of determining sufficiency as to form, the fact that we do not reject the petition is not to be construed as a determination that the petition is sufficient as to substance. Likewise, because our review is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the petition or of the objectives of its proponents, or the expression of any view respecting the adequacy or inadequacy of the petition generally.
Very truly yours,
ANDREW BAILEY
Attorney General
OP-2025-176
Supreme Court Building
207 W. High Street
P.O. Box 899
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: (573) 751-3321
Fax: (573) 751-0774
www.ago.mo.gov
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 2025 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Missouri statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.