🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
ME AG Opinion 94-1 January 3, 1994

Can the Maine House of Representatives remove and replace its Speaker by a simple majority vote, or does that require impeachment or some supermajority procedure?

Short answer: Majority vote. The AG concluded that Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 1, § 7 simply provides that the House 'shall choose their speaker, clerk, and other officers' and does not fix a term of office, a particular time for choosing, or any removal procedure. The Speaker therefore serves at the pleasure of the House and may be removed and replaced by a majority vote of the House at any time. The impeachment provisions of Me. Const. art. IX, § 5 do not apply: removing a legislative officer through impeachment (which involves the Senate) or address (which involves the Governor) would be historically inconsistent with British and Maine constitutional practice, in which each house controls its own officers.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Maine law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Maine Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Maine attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Representative William Lemke asked AG Michael Carpenter whether the House Speaker's office carries with it a status that would require more than a majority vote of the House to remove or replace. The AG concluded it does not. The Speaker may be removed and replaced by majority vote of the House at any time.

The textual analysis is short. Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 1, § 7 says only that "The House of Representatives shall choose their speaker, clerk, and other officers." That stands in contrast to the provisions for the Governor (four-year fixed term, Me. Const. art. V, pt. 1, § 2), the Secretary of State (biennial election, art. V, pt. 2, § 1), the Treasurer (art. V, pt. 3, § 1), and the Attorney General (art. IX, § 11), each of which specifies a fixed term and selection schedule. The absence of such language for the Speaker means the Speaker serves at the pleasure of the House. The AG also noted that if a supermajority were required to remove the Speaker, the same would have to apply to the Clerk and Assistant Clerk (also House officers under the same constitutional provision), which would be implausible.

The AG also considered whether the impeachment-and-address provisions of Me. Const. art. IX, § 5 apply. They do not. Impeachment is the House's sole power (art. IV, pt. 1, § 8), and trial is the Senate's sole power (art. IV, pt. 2, § 7). Removal by address is by the Governor on the address of both branches. Either procedure would inject the other chamber or the Governor into the House's internal organization. That would be foreign to British constitutional practice (the historical model for Maine's legislative structure), in which neither the House of Lords nor the King could be involved in removing a House of Commons officer. The Maine Constitutional Convention's debates in 1819-1820 do not reveal a contrary intent. So "civil office" and "any office" in art. IX, § 5 should be read to exclude officers of the Legislature itself.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1994. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

What does Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 1, § 7 actually say?

"The House of Representatives shall choose their speaker, clerk, and other officers." That is the full text the AG relied upon. The provision does not specify a term, a removal procedure, or anything about supermajorities.

Could the Speaker be impeached instead?

Theoretically, but the AG concluded the impeachment-and-address provisions of art. IX, § 5 do not apply to officers of the Legislature. Even if they did, impeachment requires the Senate to try the case (art. IV, pt. 2, § 7), which would be an awkward intrusion on the House's internal affairs.

Why does the AG cite Blackstone?

To establish that under the British constitutional model (the historical antecedent for Maine's bicameral structure), the two houses controlled their own officers. Impeachment was a power exercised by Parliament's houses jointly against executive officers, not by one house against another house's officer.

What about the Clerk and Assistant Clerk?

The AG used them as a parallel-construction argument. Art. IV, pt. 1, § 7 puts the Speaker, Clerk, and "other officers" in the same constitutional sentence. If supermajority impeachment were required to remove the Speaker, the same would have to be required to remove the Clerk. That would mean a Clerk who had lost the House's confidence could not be removed without a Senate trial. The AG implicitly treated that result as unworkable.

Does the House need cause to remove a Speaker?

No. The Speaker serves at the pleasure of the House. Majority vote is sufficient; no cause is required. That is the meaning of "serves at the pleasure of."

Background and statutory framework

Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 1, § 7: "The House of Representatives shall choose their speaker, clerk, and other officers."

Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 1, § 8: "The House of Representatives shall have the sole power of impeachment."

Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 2, § 7: The Senate "shall have the sole power to try all impeachments ... no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of 2/3 of the members present ...."

Me. Const. art. IX, § 5: "Every person holding any civil office under this State may be removed by impeachment for misdemeanor in office; and every person holding any office, may be removed by the Governor on the address of both branches of the Legislature."

By contrast, the constitutional provisions for the Governor (art. V, pt. 1, § 2), Secretary of State (art. V, pt. 2, § 1), Treasurer (art. V, pt. 3, § 1), and Attorney General (art. IX, § 11) all specify fixed terms and election schedules. The absence of such language for the Speaker is meaningful.

The historical comparison: in British constitutional practice, each house controlled its own officers. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, I, 149-51 (Univ. of Chicago ed. 1979). Removal by impeachment was a joint House-Senate power exercised against executive-branch officials, not a tool for one chamber to intervene in another's internal organization. The Debates and Journal of the Constitutional Convention of the State of Maine (1819-1820), at 202, 293 (1894), did not reveal a contrary intent for Maine.

Citations

  • Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 1, § 7 (House chooses speaker, clerk, and other officers)
  • Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 1, § 8 (House has sole power of impeachment)
  • Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 2, § 7 (Senate trial of impeachment, 2/3 conviction)
  • Me. Const. art. V, pt. 1, § 2 (Governor's four-year fixed term)
  • Me. Const. art. V, pt. 2, § 1 (Secretary of State biennial election)
  • Me. Const. art. V, pt. 3, § 1 (Treasurer)
  • Me. Const. art. IX, § 5 (removal by impeachment or address)
  • Me. Const. art. IX, § 11 (Attorney General)
  • Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, I, 149-51 (Univ. of Chicago ed. 1979)
  • Debates and Journal of the Constitutional Convention of the State of Maine (1819-1820), at 202, 293 (1894)

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain, the linked PDF is authoritative.

94-1

MICHAEL E. CARPENTER
ATTORNEY GENERAL

STATE OF MAINE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE HOUSE STATION 6
AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333

January 3, 1994

Hon. William Lemke
House of Representatives
State House Station 2
Augusta, ME 04333

Dear Representative Lemke:

You have inquired of this office whether the position of Speaker of the House of Representatives carries with it a status such that removal of a Speaker or election of a replacement Speaker would require more than a majority vote of the membership of the House. For the reasons which follow, it is the opinion of this Department that the Speaker may be removed and replaced by majority vote of the House.

Article IV, Part First, Section 7 of the Maine Constitution provides simply that "The House of Representatives shall choose their speaker, clerk, and other officers." The provision does not specify a fixed term of office such as, for example, is provided for the Office of Governor ("the Governor ... shall hold the office for four years ...", Me. Const. art. V, pt. 1, § 2), nor does it specify that the election of the Speaker shall occur at any particular time, such as is the case for the so-called "constitutional officers" ("The Secretary of State shall be chosen biennially ...," Me. Const. art. V, pt. 2, § 1; see also art. V, pt. 3, § 1 (Treasurer); art. IX, § 11 (Attorney General)). It thus appears that, on its face, the provision of the Maine Constitution providing for the choosing of the Speaker neither specifies a fixed term during which the holder of that position may hold office, nor does it specify a particular time at which the Speaker is to be chosen. In consequence, the Constitution does not fix the tenure of the Speakers's office, and the Speaker must be viewed as serving at the pleasure of the House of Representatives, and therefore may be removed and replaced at any time by a majority of the House of Representatives. If this were not the case, it would mean that the Clerk and the Assistant Clerk of the House also could not be removed except by impeachment.

This conclusion is not altered by the terms of the Maine Constitution relating to the procedure for impeachment or address by the Legislature. Article IX, Section 5 of the Constitution provides:

Removal by impeachment or address. Every person holding any civil office under this State may be removed by impeachment for misdemeanor in office; and every person holding any office, may be removed by the Governor on the address of both branches of the Legislature. But before such address shall pass either House, the causes of removal shall be stated and entered on the journal the House in which it originated and a copy thereof served on the person in office, that the person may be admitted to a hearing, and that person's own defense.

With regard to impeachment, the Constitution further provides that the "House of Representatives shall have the sole power of impeachment," Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 1, § 8, and that the Senate

... shall have the sole power to try all impeachments, and when sitting for that purpose shall be on oath or affirmation, and no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of 2/3 of the members present ....

Me. Const. art. IV, pt. 2, § 7.

The issue presented by these provisions is whether the office of Speaker of the House may be considered a "civil office" for purposes of Article IX, Section 5, thus according the incumbent the protection of the impeachment process, or may be considered "any office" for purposes of the address procedure. There are no judicial decisions that speak to this issue. Moreover, review by this Department of the history of the enactment of these provisions at the Maine Constitutional Convention in 1819 does not reveal the intention of the framers on this point. Debates and Journal of the Constitutional Convention of the State of Maine (1819-1820), at 202, 293 (1894). Nor does research disclose that the issue has ever arisen in any other jurisdiction, most of which have similar provisions in their constitutions. Upon review of the applicable provisions, this Department does not believe that Article IX, Section 5 of the Maine Constitution can be read to apply to the office of Speaker of the House.

The reason for this is that it would have been historically inconsistent for the framers of the Maine Constitution to have involved other constitutional institutions of the State, such as the Senate and the Governor, in the removal of the officers of the House. The form of government of the State of Maine, like that of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts from which it was severed in 1820, derives from prior British practice, in which legislative power was wielded by two co-equal bodies, the House of Commons and the House of Lords, one of which was chosen by election and the other by heredity, and the King or Queen, also chosen by heredity. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, I, 149 (U. Chi. 1979). Each of these constitutional institutions enjoyed certain checks upon the powers of the others, one of which was the power of impeachment and punishment, which was exercised by the two houses jointly against the executive power. Id. at I, 150-51. Impeachment was not, however, a power exercised by one house against the other, or by one house and the King or Queen against the other. Thus, it would have been wholly foreign to British practice for the House of Lords or the King to have been formally involved in the removal of an officer of the House of Commons.

For the same reason, we see no basis for concluding that the framers of the Maine Constitution desired to involve either the Senate or the Governor in the process of removing or replacing the Speaker of the House. Thus, this Department would not interpret the terms "civil office" or "any office" in Article IX, Section 5 of the Maine Constitution to include officers of the Legislature. Consequently, the House may remove the Speaker at any time by majority vote.

I hope the foregoing answers your question. Please feel free to inquire further if clarification is necessary.

MICHAEL E. CARPENTER
Attorney General

MEC/bls

cc: Hon. John L. Martin
Hon. Dennis L. Dutremble

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1994 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Maine statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.