🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
FL INFORMAL October 16, 2008

Can a Florida homeowners association developer assign its development rights to another developer, and what happens to developer rights when control transfers to homeowners?

Short answer: The opinion found that Chapter 720 does not address whether a developer can assign its development rights to another developer. It did note that when control of a homeowners' association transfers away from the developer under section 720.307, certain developer rights, including voting rights, control of the association, and control of association funds and property, are affected.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2008. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Florida law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2008
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Florida Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Florida attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2008. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Plain-English summary

A state senator asked the Attorney General's office several questions about homeowners' associations and developers following changes the Legislature made to Chapter 720, Florida Statutes, in 2007. The opinion addressed three questions: whether a developer could assign its development rights to another developer, what happens to developer rights when control of an association transfers to the homeowners, and whether a parcel owner had a statutory right to sue an association for violating the declaration of covenants.

On assignability, the opinion found that Chapter 720 simply did not address whether an initial developer of a subdivision community could assign its development rights to another developer. On the transfer-of-control question, the opinion noted that section 720.307 affected several developer rights once control passed to the homeowners' association, including voting rights, control of the association, control of association funds, and control of the association's tangible property. On the cause-of-action question, the opinion read section 720.3035(4) as clearly giving a parcel owner the right to recover damages, including costs and attorney's fees, when an association or its committees unreasonably, knowingly, and willfully infringed on the owner's rights under the declaration of covenants.

Background and analysis (as of 2008)

The opinion explained that a homeowners' association under Chapter 720 is a Florida nonprofit corporation responsible for operating a community, where membership is mandatory for parcel owners and the association can impose assessments that become liens if unpaid. The Legislature's stated purpose for Chapter 720 was to give statutory recognition to these associations, provide operating procedures, and protect members' rights "without unduly impairing the ability of such associations to perform their functions," while also stating it was not in associations' or members' best interest to create a state regulatory bureau over association affairs.

The senator's questions arose from Chapter 2007-173, Laws of Florida, effective July 1, 2007, which reduced the school board's representation and added non-governmental protections to association governance elsewhere in Florida law. The opinion noted it found no case law interpreting those 2007 changes and pointed to the Florida Senate's staff analysis of the bill as a resource, citing the general rule that legislative history can help determine legislative intent.

On the first question, the opinion found that Chapter 720 is limited to the statutory definition of "homeowners' association" and does not speak to whether development rights can be assigned to a different developer. On the second question, section 720.307 was described as affecting a developer's voting rights, control of the association, control of association funds, and control of tangible association property once control transferred to the homeowners. On the third question, the opinion quoted section 720.3035(4) directly: an association or committee that unreasonably, knowingly, and willfully infringes on a parcel owner's rights under the declaration of covenants exposes itself to a damages claim, including costs and reasonable attorney's fees, from the affected owner.

Citations and references

Statutes (as they stood in 2008):

  • Chapter 720, Florida Statutes, governing homeowners' associations
  • s. 720.301(1), (3), (9), Fla. Stat., defining "community" and "homeowners' association" and describing assessment liens
  • s. 720.302(1), Fla. Stat., stating the chapter's purpose
  • s. 720.302(4), Fla. Stat. (as amended by Ch. 2007-173), scope of the chapter
  • s. 720.307(2), (3)(h), (3)(j), (3)(k), Fla. Stat., developer voting, control, funds, and property rights on transfer of association control
  • s. 720.3035(4), Fla. Stat., parcel owner's right of action for infringement of declaration rights
  • s. 16, Ch. 2007-173, Laws of Fla., repealing the Department of Business and Professional Regulation's dispute-resolution role under s. 720.311

Cases:

  • Ellsworth v. Insurance Company of America, 508 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), legislative staff analysis deserves significant weight in determining legislative intent
  • Byte International Corporation v. Maurice Gusman Residuary Trust Number 1, 629 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), same principle on legislative intent

Source

Original opinion text

The Honorable Michael S. Bennett

Senator, 21st District of Florida

Wildewood Professional Park

3653 Cortez Road, West

Suite 90

Bradenton, Florida 34210

Dear Senator Bennett:

Thank you for contacting this office for assistance relating to the actions of homeowners' associations and developers under Chapter 720, Florida Statutes. Attorney General McCollum has asked me to respond to your letter. The following general comments are offered to assist you in advising your constituents.

A homeowners' association created pursuant to Chapter 720, Florida Statutes, is a Florida corporation responsible for the operation of a community[1] in which the voting members are parcel owners or their agents, or a combination of both, and in which membership is a mandatory condition of parcel ownership. A homeowners' association is authorized to impose assessments that may become a lien on the parcel if they remain unpaid.[2] The term "homeowners' association" does not include a community development district or any other similar, statutorily created special taxing district.[3]

The expressed purpose for Chapter 720, Florida Statutes, relating to homeowners' associations, is "to give statutory recognition to corporations not for profit that operate residential communities in this state, to provide procedures for operating homeowners' associations, and to protect the rights of association members without unduly impairing the ability of such associations to perform their functions."[4] The Legislature has specifically determined that "it is not in the best interest of homeowners' associations or the individual association members thereof to create or impose a bureau or other agency of state government to regulate the affairs of homeowners' associations." Thus, involvement in these matters by state agencies and officials has been discouraged by the Legislature.[5]

You have asked several questions involving changes made to Chapter 720, Florida Statutes, by Chapter 2007-173, Laws of Florida. My review of legal resources does not indicate any case law that has developed since those changes became effective on July 1, 2007, which would assist in answering your questions. I am enclosing a copy of the final staff analysis of the Florida Legislature for your consideration as that will give you some idea whether these matters were considered and addressed by Chapter 2007-173. It is a rule of statutory construction that the legislative intent is the guiding force in statutory construction, and legislative history may be helpful in determining legislative intent.[6]

You have asked whether Chapter 720, Florida Statutes, would allow the initial developer of a subdivision community to assign its development rights to another developer. I would caution that Chapter 720, Florida Statutes, is specifically limited to homeowners' associations within the definition of that term.[7] Corporations operating residential homeowners' associations in Florida are governed by and subject to Chapters 607 or 617, Florida Statutes, as well as the provisions of Chapter 720. Chapter 720, Florida Statutes, does not appear to address the assignability of development rights in a "subdivision community" or in other "homeowners' associations" or "associations" within the scope of the statute.

You also ask whether the transfer of control of a homeowners' association under section 720.307, Florida Statutes, results in the relinquishment of any developer rights. A reading of section 720.307, Florida Statutes, indicates that certain rights of developers are affected by the transition of association control in a community. Among those rights are voting rights;[8] rights to control the association;[9] the control of association funds;[10] and control of tangible property of the association.[11]

Finally, you have asked whether section 720.3035, Florida Statutes, provides a statutory cause of action in favor of a parcel owner against a homeowners' association for unreasonably infringing upon or impairing the rights of a parcel owner under the declaration of covenants. Section 720.3035(4), Florida Statutes, provides that:

"If the association or any architectural, construction improvement, or other such similar committee of the association should unreasonably, knowingly, and willfully infringe upon or impair the rights and privileges set forth in the declaration of covenants or other published guidelines and standards authorized by the declaration of covenants, the adversely affected parcel owner shall be entitled to recover damages caused by such infringement or impairment, including any costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred in preserving or restoring the rights and privileges of the parcel owner set forth in the declaration of covenants or other published guidelines and standards authorized by the declaration of covenants."

This section clearly recognizes the right of a parcel owner to bring an action for damages caused by unreasonable, knowing, and willful violations of the declaration of covenants or other published guidelines and standards by the association or others.

I trust that these informal comments will be helpful to you.

Sincerely,

Gerry Hammond

Senior Assistant Attorney General

GH/tsh

Enclosure: The Florida Senate Professional Staff Analysis

    and Economic Impact Statement, April 18, 2007

[1] See 720.301(3), Fla. Stat., defining "[c]ommunity" to mean "the real property that is or will be subject to a declaration of covenants which is recorded in the county where the property is located. The term 'community' includes all real property, including undeveloped phases, that is or was the subject of a development-of-regional-impact development order, together with any approved modification thereto."

[2] Section 720.301(1), Fla. Stat.

[3] Section 720.301(9), Fla. Stat.

[4] Section 720.302(1), Fla. Stat.

[5] And see s. 16, Ch. 2007-173, Laws of Fla., repealing provisions relating to the authority of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation to assist with dispute resolution pursuant to section 720.311, Fla. Stat.

[6] See Ellsworth v. Insurance Company of America, 508 So. 2d 395, 401 n. 3 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (staff analysis of legislation should be accorded significant respect in determining legislative intent); Byte International Corporation v. Maurice Gusman Residuary Trust Number 1, 629 So. 2d 191, 192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 00-07 (2000).

[7] See s. 720.302(4), Fla. Stat., as amended by s. 8, Ch. 2007-173, Laws of Fla., stating that this chapter does not apply to any association that is subject to regulation under Ch. 718, Ch. 719, or Ch. 721 or to any non-mandatory association formed under Ch. 723, Fla. Stat.; and see the definition of a "[h]omeowners' association" in s. 720.301(9), Fla. Stat.

[8] Section 720.307(2), Fla. Stat.

[9] Section 720.307(3)(h), Fla. Stat

[10] Section 720.307(3)(j), Fla. Stat.

[11] Section 720.307(3)(k), Fla. Stat.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2008 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Florida statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.