🧪 TEST MODE ACTIVE Use test card: 4242 4242 4242 4242
DE 18-IB31 June 29, 2018

Is a Delaware volunteer fire company that gets state grant funding and Fire Commission oversight a public body under FOIA?

Short answer: No, according to this opinion. The AG ruled the Camden-Wyoming Fire Company, a private nonprofit corporation, is not a 'public body' subject to Delaware FOIA, even though it receives state grant-in-aid funding, some of its volunteers get certain state-employee-like benefits, and it operates under State Fire Prevention Commission oversight, because it was never created, appointed, or empowered by any government entity in the first place.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2018. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Delaware law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2018
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Delaware Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Delaware attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Official title

18-IB31 6/28/2018 FOIA Opinion Letter to Mr. Chris Dufresne re: FOIA Complaint Concerning the Camden-Wyoming Fire Company

Plain-English summary

A member of the Camden-Wyoming Fire Company asked the Fire Company for the unedited minutes and audio of an April 2018 board meeting, along with the attendance roster. The Fire Company's attorney refused, arguing the Fire Company isn't a "public body" and therefore isn't covered by FOIA at all. The member disagreed, pointing to three connections between the Fire Company and state government: it receives state grant-in-aid funding, its members get some benefits under Delaware law similar to those of state employees, and the State Fire Prevention Commission has regulatory authority over fire companies.

The AG sided with the Fire Company. Delaware's two-part test for a "public body" requires, first, that the entity be a governmental or government-created body, and second, that it be publicly funded or charged by a public official to advise or report; both parts must be met. The Fire Company, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation formed in 1917 through a merger of two earlier fire companies, fails the first part outright: it wasn't created by the legislature, wasn't appointed by any public official, and wasn't otherwise empowered by a state entity. Receiving grant funding only speaks to the second part of the test and can't fix a failure on the first part. Extending certain state-employee-style benefits to volunteer firefighters by statute doesn't convert the Fire Company itself into a government body, and the Fire Prevention Commission's regulatory authority over where new fire companies can operate is oversight, not creation. Camden and Wyoming had the legal option to run their own municipal fire departments but chose instead to rely on this private Fire Company, and that choice doesn't make the Fire Company a public body.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2018. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Does receiving state grant funding make a Delaware volunteer fire company a "public body" subject to FOIA?

No, based on this opinion. The AG found that public funding relates only to the second part of the two-part public body test, and can't cure a failure on the first part, which asks whether the entity was created, appointed, or empowered by government in the first place.

If Delaware law treats volunteer firefighters like state employees for benefits purposes, does that make their fire company a public body?

No, according to this opinion. The AG found that extending certain state-employee-type benefits, like tort claims act coverage, to volunteer firefighters by statute does not transform the fire company itself into a public body for FOIA purposes.

Does state regulatory oversight of fire companies make them public bodies?

No, per this opinion. The AG found the State Fire Prevention Commission's authority to approve new fire companies and resolve boundary disputes is regulatory oversight of an existing private entity, not the kind of creation or appointment that satisfies the first part of the public body test.

If a municipality could run its own fire department but instead relies on a private fire company, does FOIA follow the function to that company?

No, based on this opinion. The AG noted that Camden and Wyoming both had charter authority to operate their own municipal fire departments but chose not to, and that choice to rely on a private nonprofit instead does not extend FOIA's reach to the private entity providing the service.

Background and statutory framework

Delaware FOIA, 29 Del. C. §§ 10001-10007, lets a requester petition the AG under 29 Del. C. § 10005(e) for a determination that a public body violated the law. Section 10002(h) supplies the two-part "public body" test, and § 10002(k) defines "public funds." The opinion applied its established rule that both parts of that test must be satisfied, and that receipt of public funds alone never converts a private entity into a public body. It also addressed two statutes the requester cited for the proposition that fire company members are treated like state employees, 10 Del. C. § 4010 (extending County and Municipal Tort Claims Act coverage to registered volunteer fire companies) and 19 Del. C. § 2312 (treating volunteer firefighters as state employees for workers' compensation purposes), finding neither statute converts the fire company itself into a government body. The State Fire Prevention Commission's regulatory authority over fire company boundaries and operations comes from 16 Del. C. § 6607. The opinion also cited State v. Camden-Wyoming Sewer and Water Auth. for the related point that the two-part test yields to a statute that specifically designates an entity as a public body, a designation that does not exist here.

Citations

  • 29 Del. C. §§ 10001-10007 (Delaware FOIA)
  • 29 Del. C. § 10005(e) (petition procedure for AG determination)
  • 29 Del. C. § 10002(h) (two-part definition of "public body")
  • 29 Del. C. § 10002(k) (definition of "public funds")
  • 10 Del. C. § 4010 (County and Municipal Tort Claims Act coverage for registered volunteer fire companies)
  • 19 Del. C. § 2312 (volunteer firefighters treated as state employees for workers' compensation)
  • 16 Del. C. § 6607 (State Fire Prevention Commission's regulatory authority)
  • State v. Camden-Wyoming Sewer and Water Auth., 2012 WL 5431035 (Del. Super. Nov. 7, 2012) (Delaware Superior Court; two-part test inapplicable where a statute specifically designates an entity as a public body)

Source

Original opinion text

PRINT VERSION: Attorney General Opinion No. 18-IB31

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Attorney General Opinion No. 18-IB31

June 28, 2018

VIA US MAIL AND EMAIL

Mr. Chris Dufresne

282 Chanticleer Cr.

Camden, Delaware 19934

[email protected]

RE: FOIA Petition Regarding the Camden-Wyoming Fire Company

Dear Mr. Dufresne:

We write in response to your correspondence, received on June 1, 2018, alleging that the Camden-Wyoming Fire Company ("Fire Company") violated the Delaware Freedom of Information Act, 29 Del. C. §§ 10001-10007 ("FOIA"). We treat your correspondence as a petition ("Petition") for a determination pursuant to 29 Del. C. § 10005(e) regarding whether a violation of FOIA has occurred or is about to occur. Since you have alleged a violation of FOIA against an entity that has not been previously determined to be a "public body" under FOIA, the first and ultimately controlling issue in this case is whether the Fire Company is a "public body" within the meaning of FOIA. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the Fire Company is not a public body and therefore is not subject to FOIA.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On June 1, 2018, you sent a FOIA records request to the Fire Company for the following items: 1) the un-edited minutes of the Board of Directors meeting on April 23, 2018 in written and audio forms; and 2) the attendance roster for the April 23, 2018 meeting. Your request went unanswered, and you sent a Petition to this Office on June 1, 2018. In a letter dated June 18, 2018, Fire Company's legal advisor asserted that the Fire Company is not a "public body" as that term is defined in FOIA ("Response Letter"). On the same day, you sent a reply to this Office ("Reply") contesting the Fire Company's position that it is not a public body for three reasons: 1) its receipt of State grant-in-aid funding; 2) fire company members "fall under state of Delaware employees" in the performance of their duties; and 3) its grant of authority by the State Fire Commission. Further, your Reply indicated that the Fire Company had since provided you a copy of the shorthand meeting minutes in written form, but you still wished to receive the meeting audio in its entirety.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The Camden-Wyoming Fire Company is a 501(c)(3) Delaware corporation that was incorporated in 1926. [1] Historical records indicate that various entities provided fire protection services to the Camden and Wyoming areas since the late 1800's. [2] The current corporation was formed by a reorganization of two former companies, the Wyoming Fire Company and the Rescue Hook and Ladder Company in Camden in 1917. [3] The Fire Company's membership is comprised of both volunteer and paid employees. [4]

DISCUSSION

To determine if an entity is a "public body," and thus subject to FOIA, a two-part analysis is required. First, we must determine whether the entity is a "regulatory, administrative, advisory, executive, appointive or legislative body of the State, or of any political subdivision of the State" as further defined by the statute. [5] If so, we must next determine whether the entity is supported in whole or in part by any public funds, expends or disburses any public funds, or is impliedly or specifically charged to advise or to make reports, investigations, or recommendations. "Public funds," are defined as "those funds derived from the State or any political subdivision of the State." [6] Both parts of this test must be satisfied in order for an entity to be considered a "public body" under FOIA. [7]

The Fire Company is not a municipality or a political subdivision of the State. As a non-profit corporation, the Fire Company is separate and distinct from the municipalities of Camden and Wyoming. It was not established by an act of the General Assembly or a body established by the General Assembly. The Fire Company was not appointed by any body or public official of the State, or otherwise empowered by any state governmental entity. It is not a municipal fire department, but instead, it is a nonprofit corporation which has been authorized to serve both the Camden and Wyoming areas. [8] As such, the first element of a "public body" is not met and the Fire Company is not a public body. [9]

The other arguments asserted in your Petition do not alter this analysis. First, you mention that the Fire Company receives State grant-in-aid funding, but this point pertains to the second component of the analysis and does not affect the reasoning of the first element set forth above. Second, you allege that the Fire Company members "fall under" State of Delaware employees in the performance of their duties. However, even if members of the Fire Company have accepted some of the benefits offered to the Fire Company employees in the State Code, that is insufficient to transform the Fire Company into a "public body" for purposes of FOIA. [10] Finally, your Petition states that the Fire Company has been granted authority by the State of Delaware Fire Prevention Commission ("FPC"). The FPC has the authority to determine whether new fire companies or substations shall be authorized in any part of the State, to enter into agreements resolving boundary disputes, to require audits, and other related powers. [11] In essence, the FPC has some regulatory oversight of the fire companies in the State as specified by statute, but the FPC does not have any authority to establish a fire company. [12] The FPC's regulation of the Fire Company or any other private corporation is not germane to whether that corporation is a "public body" for purposes of FOIA.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons discussed above, it is our determination that the Fire Company is not a public body and, therefore, the Fire Company is not subject to FOIA. [13]

Very truly yours,

/s/ Dorey L. Cole


Dorey L. Cole

Deputy Attorney General

APPROVED BY:

/s/ Allison E. Reardon


Allison E. Reardon

State Solicitor

cc:

Aaron R. Goldstein, Chief Deputy Attorney General (via email)

Craig T. Eliassen, Esq. (via email)

[1] See Response Letter; "History, Camden-Wyoming Fire Company" http://www.cwfc41.com/page/history (last visited June 18, 2018); State of Delaware Division of Corporations," https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/ecorp/entitysearch/NameSearch.aspx (last visited on June 27, 2018).

[2] See "History, Camden-Wyoming Fire Company" http://www.cwfc41.com/page/history (last visited June 18, 2018).

[3] Id.

[4] "Camden-Wyoming Fire Company," http://www.cwfc41.com/ (last visited June 27, 2018).

[5] 29 Del. C. § 10002(h)

[6] 29 Del. C. § 10002(k).

[7] See Del. Op. Att'y Gen. 12-IIB05, 2012 WL 1244481, at 2 (Mar. 27, 2012) (noting that an entity is not a public body unless both parts of the two-part test are met); but cf. State v. Camden-Wyoming Sewer and Water Auth., 2012 WL 5431035, at 3-4 (Del. Super. Nov. 7, 2012) (two-part test not applicable if statute specifically designates an entity as a public body for purposes of FOIA).

[8] Pursuant to their respective charters, both Wyoming and Camden have the power, but not the obligation, to create and operate a municipal fire department and/or enact measures for fire protection. See Wyoming, Del., C. (Charter) §28; Camden, Del., C. (Charter) §25(a)(25). Importantly, those entities chose not to provide fire protection services as a directly-administered municipal service, but instead chose to rely on the Fire Company to provide fire protection services.

[9] It is not necessary to address the second component of the two-part test, since the first part of the test was not met. However, as this issue was specifically raised in your Petition, it bears repetition of the settled principle that the receipt of public funds alone is not sufficient to create a public body. Del. Op. Att'y Gen. 17-IB23, 2017 WL 2345247, at *8 (July 14, 2017) ("However, an entity's receipt of public funds does not automatically transform that entity into a "public body.").

[10] See e.g., 10 Del. C. § 4010 (extending provisions under the County and Municipal Tort Claims Act to "registered volunteer fire companies" by definition); 19 Del. C. § 2312 ("For purposes of this chapter, volunteer firefighters shall be treated as State employees so long as the State elects to be covered by the application of this chapter.").

[11] 16 Del. C. § 6607.

[12] See id.

[13] Several recent opinions support this conclusion. See e.g., Del. Op. Att'y Gen. 17-IIB23, 2017 WL 3426263, at 7-8 (July 14, 2017) (finding that Brandywine Valley SPCA is not a "public body" as it is a "private, non-profit entity that contracts with the state for sheltering services"); Del. Op. Att'y Gen. 15-IIB05, 2015 WL 4850416, at 2 (July 31, 2015) (finding that the Cape Henlopen Senior Center is not a "public body" since it is not a "regulatory, administrative, advisory, executive, appointive or legislative body").

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2018 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Delaware statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.