Can an Arkansas county library board use a sick-leave policy different from the quorum court's countywide policy?

Arkansas AG Opinion 2013-070: County Library Sick Leave

Plain-English summary

Opinion 2013-070 concluded that the Faulkner County Library Board could not give county library employees a sick-leave policy that conflicted with the general policy adopted by the Faulkner County Quorum Court.

"The Faulkner County Library Board lacks authority, in my opinion, to adopt a sick leave policy for county library employees that conflicts with or differs from the policy established by the Quorum Court."
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

The opinion relied on A.C.A. § 14-14-805, which authorized a quorum court to establish general vacation and sick-leave policies that applied uniformly to county employees. The statutory exception covered elected county officers, not their staffs or other county employees.

"Legislation applying to employee policy practices shall be only of a general nature and shall be uniform in application to all employees of the county."
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

"subsection 14-14-805(2) exempts from the scope of a county’s general employment policy only elected county officers, not those officers’ staffs or any other county employees."
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2013. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

What conflict prompted the opinion?

The audit materials said the library board allowed employees to accumulate up to 640 sick-leave hours, while the county personnel manual set a 480-hour maximum.

"County library employees are allowed to accumulate up to 640 hours of sick leave as approved by the County Library Board. This is in apparent conflict with the Faulkner County personnel manual which states “,,. This earned sick leave can be carried over and allowed to accumulate up to a maximum of 480 hours....”"
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

Who had authority to establish the general county sick-leave policy?

The quorum court did. The opinion said sick-leave policy for county employees plainly fell within its legislative authority under A.C.A. § 14-14-805.

"The enactment of a sick leave policy for county employees plainly falls within the legislative authority of a quorum court, pursuant to A.C.A. § 14-14-805."
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

Were library employees treated as county employees?

Yes for the question presented. The opinion assumed the quorum court's policy was general and uniform and treated the referenced county library employees as covered by it.

"I assume it is general in nature and applies uniformly to all employees of the county — including the ‘county library employees’ referenced in the Division of Legislative Audit audit report."
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

Did the elected-officer exception apply to library employees?

No. The exception applied only to elected county officers, not to staff members or other county employees.

"only elected county officers, not those officers’ staffs or any other county employees."
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

Did the opinion decide every issue involving regional-library employee benefits?

No. It noted A.C.A. § 13-2-407 but said that provision was not implicated by the question about Faulkner County library employees.

"I do not believe it is implicated under your particular question concerning Faulkner County library employees."
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

Background and statutory framework

Faulkner County Ordinance No. 78-8 had established the county library department and its administrative board. The request stated that the ordinance did not discuss sick leave and that audit staff reported no delegation of sick-leave policy authority to the board.

"You state, finally, that the Ordinance does not discuss sick leave and that according to Division of Legislative Audit staff, the authority to establish sick leave policy was not delegated to the Faulkner County Library Board."
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

The opinion treated a properly adopted general county policy as controlling over a conflicting policy adopted by a county board.

"such a policy is generally controlling in the face of a conflicting policy adopted by a county board, including a library board."
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

Holding

The library board lacked authority to depart from the quorum court's sick-leave policy for county library employees.

"the Faulkner County Library Board lacks authority to adopt a sick leave policy for county library employees that contravenes a policy established by the Quorum Court pursuant to A.C.A. § 14-14-805(2)."
Source: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

Citations and references

Statutes discussed by Opinion 2013-070:

• "A.C.A. § 14-14-712" Official opinions search
• "A.C.A. § 14-14-805" Official opinions search
• "A.C.A. § 14-14-805(2)" Official opinions search
• "A.C.A. § 13-2-407" Official opinions search

Source

• Landing page: https://arkansasag.gov/divisions/opinions-foia/attorney-general-opinions-search/

Original opinion text

STATE OF ARKANSAS

Tue ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dustin McDANIEL

Opinion No. 2013-070

September 17, 2013

The Honorable Roger Norman, JD, CPA, CFE
Legislative Auditor

Division of Legislative Audit

172 State Capitol

Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1099

Dear Mr. Norman:

You have requested my opinion on the following question concerning sick leave
for county library employees:

Does the Faulkner County Library Board have the authority to
establish a sick leave policy that conflicts with, or differs from the
sick leave policy established by the Faulkner County Quorum Court?

As background for this question, you state that an audit report concerning
Faulkner County, Arkansas, contained the following finding:

County library employees are allowed to accumulate up to 640 hours
of sick leave as approved by the County Library Board. This is in
apparent conflict with the Faulkner County personnel manual which
states “,,. This earned sick leave can be carried over and allowed to
accumulate up to a maximum of 480 hours....”

As further background, you note that Faulkner County Ordinance No. 78-8
(“Ordinance”) established the Faulkner County Library Department and _ its
administrative board pursuant to section 107 of Act 742 of 1977 (now codified at
A.C.A. § 14-14-712 (Repl. 1998)).! You also report that the Ordinance grants the

' Act 742 of 1977 is the enabling legislation to Ark. Const. amend. 55, which reorganized county
government. Section 107 of Act 742 made county library boards subject to reorganization by county
ordinance.

323 CENTER STREET, SUITE 200 * LITTLE Rock, ARKANSAS 72201
TELEPHONE (501) 682-2007 * Fax (501) 682-8084
INTERNET WEBSITE ¢ http://www.ag.state.ar.us/

The Honorable Roger Norman
Legislative Auditor

Opinion No. 2013-070

Page 2

administrative board “all powers enumerated in Section 103 of Act 742 of 1977, as
well as ... all powers normally incidental to the administration” of a library.2 You
state, finally, that the Ordinance does not discuss sick leave and that according to
Division of Legislative Audit staff, the authority to establish sick leave policy was
not delegated to the Faulkner County Library Board.

After seeking legal advice regarding its authority, the Board has expressed
disagreement with the audit finding.

RESPONSE

Given that a sick leave policy established by the Faulkner County Quorum Court
must be general in nature and apply uniformly to all employees of the county, it is
my opinion that the answer to your question is “no.” The Faulkner County
Library Board lacks authority, in my opinion, to adopt a sick leave policy for
county library employees that conflicts with or differs from the policy established
by the Quorum Court.

The enactment of a sick leave policy for county employees plainly falls within the
legislative authority of a quorum court, pursuant to A.C.A. § 14-14-805, which
provides in relevant part:

[A] quorum court may exercise any legislative authority with regard
to employee policy and practices of a general nature, including, but
not limited to, establishment of general vacation and sick leave
policies.... Legislation promulgated by a quorum court dealing with
matters of employee policy and practices shall be applicable only to
employees of the county and shall not apply to the elected county
officers of the county. Legislation applying to employee policy
practices shall be only of a general nature and shall be uniform in
application to all employees of the county.”

The background information accompanying your request for my opinion indicates
that the Faulkner County Quorum Court has exercised its authority under this
statute and established a sick leave policy. I have not been provided with the
actual policy, but I assume it is general in nature and applies uniformly to all

• Section 103 of Act 742 (A.C.A, § 14-14-705 (Repl. 1998), provides general authority for the creation of
  advisory or administrative boards by counties.

7 A.C.A, § 14-14-805(2) (Repl. 1998) (emphasis added).

The Honorable Roger Norman
Legislative Auditor

Opinion No. 2013-070

Page 3

employees of the county — including the “county library employees” referenced in
the Division of Legislative Audit audit report.

As you can see from the above excerpt, subsection 14-14-805(2) exempts from the
scope of a county’s general employment policy only elected county officers, not
those officers’ staffs or any other county employees. In my opinion, such a policy
is generally controlling in the face of a conflicting policy adopted by a county
board, including a library board.’

In response to your particular question, therefore, it is my opinion that the
Faulkner County Library Board lacks authority to adopt a sick leave policy for
county library employees that contravenes a policy established by the Quorum
Court pursuant to A.C.A. § 14-14-805(2).°

Deputy Attorney General Elisabeth A. Walker prepared the foregoing opinion,
which I hereby approve.

Sincerely,
Attorney General
DM/EAW:cyh

‘ This office has previously opined that a county library board may have recourse to the courts if it feels its
core functions have been compromised by inadequate quorum court appropriations. See Op. Atty Gen.
2001-012. As a general proposition, I belicve a library board might similarly challenge the adequacy of a
county general leave policy. The resolution of any such issue is a matter for the courts, however, and not a
library board in contravention of quorum court determinations, Additionally, it is difficult to envision facts
that would render library employees unique in a sense entitling the Board to depart from an employment
policy that is constitutionally adequate as to other county employees.

° According to material attached to your request, the Faulkner County Library Board is a constituent
member of the Faulkner-Van Buren Regional Library System (“System”). I note that A.C.A. § 13-2-407
(Repl. 2003) provides for the creation of such a “regional public library system,” and that subsection (d)
thereof addresses “fringe benefit coverage” for “eligible employees of a ... regional public library system.”
The precise scope and operation of this subsection are not entirely clear. The statute addresses “benefits”
for system employees but does not further define or identify those employees. I mention this statute only
because it appears to address benefits for some category of employees working under a library system. I do
not believe it is implicated under your particular question concerning Faulkner County library employees.
As stated above, those employees are in my opinion subject to the sick leave policy established by the
Faulkner County Quorum Court.